Influence of exercise intensity and hypoxic exposure on physiological, perceptual and biomechanical responses to treadmill running

IF 3
Chris Chow Li Tee, Mee Chee Chong, Viswanath Sundar, Chuen Leang Chok, Mohd Rizal Md Razali, Wee Kian Yeo, Olivier Girard
{"title":"Influence of exercise intensity and hypoxic exposure on physiological, perceptual and biomechanical responses to treadmill running","authors":"Chris Chow Li Tee,&nbsp;Mee Chee Chong,&nbsp;Viswanath Sundar,&nbsp;Chuen Leang Chok,&nbsp;Mohd Rizal Md Razali,&nbsp;Wee Kian Yeo,&nbsp;Olivier Girard","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2022.2109066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Acute physiological, perceptual and biomechanical consequences of manipulating both exercise intensity and hypoxic exposure during treadmill running were determined. On separate days, eleven trained individuals ran for 45 s (separated by 135 s of rest) on an instrumented treadmill at seven running speeds (8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 km.h<sup>−1</sup>) in normoxia (NM, FiO<sub>2</sub> = 20.9%), moderate hypoxia (MH, FiO<sub>2</sub> = 16.1%), high hypoxia (HH, FiO<sub>2</sub> = 14.1%) and severe hypoxia (SH, FiO<sub>2</sub> = 13.0%). Running mechanics were collected over 20 consecutive steps (i.e. after running ∼25 s), with concurrent assessment of physiological (heart rate and arterial oxygen saturation) and perceptual (overall perceived discomfort, difficulty breathing and leg discomfort) responses. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (seven speeds × four conditions) were used. There was a speed × condition interaction for heart rate (<i>p</i> = 0.045, ηp<sup>2 </sup>=<sup> </sup>0.22), with lower values in NM, MH and HH compared to SH at 8 km.h<sup>−1</sup> (125 ± 12, 125 ± 11, 128 ± 12 vs 132 ± 10 b.min<sup>−1</sup>). Overall perceived discomfort (8 and 16 km.h<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.019 and <i>p</i> = 0.007, ηp<sup>2  </sup>= 0.21, respectively) and perceived difficulty breathing (all speeds; <i>p</i> = 0.023, ηp<sup>2  </sup>= 0.37) were greater in SH compared to MH, whereas leg discomfort was not influenced by hypoxic exposure. Minimal difference was observed in the twelve kinetics/kinematics variables with hypoxia (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.122; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2 </sup>= 0.19). Running at slower speeds in combination with severe hypoxia elevates physiological and perceptual responses without a corresponding increase in ground reaction forces.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"23 8","pages":"1581-1590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/17461391.2022.2109066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/17461391.2022.2109066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute physiological, perceptual and biomechanical consequences of manipulating both exercise intensity and hypoxic exposure during treadmill running were determined. On separate days, eleven trained individuals ran for 45 s (separated by 135 s of rest) on an instrumented treadmill at seven running speeds (8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 km.h−1) in normoxia (NM, FiO2 = 20.9%), moderate hypoxia (MH, FiO2 = 16.1%), high hypoxia (HH, FiO2 = 14.1%) and severe hypoxia (SH, FiO2 = 13.0%). Running mechanics were collected over 20 consecutive steps (i.e. after running ∼25 s), with concurrent assessment of physiological (heart rate and arterial oxygen saturation) and perceptual (overall perceived discomfort, difficulty breathing and leg discomfort) responses. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (seven speeds × four conditions) were used. There was a speed × condition interaction for heart rate (p = 0.045, ηp2 =0.22), with lower values in NM, MH and HH compared to SH at 8 km.h−1 (125 ± 12, 125 ± 11, 128 ± 12 vs 132 ± 10 b.min−1). Overall perceived discomfort (8 and 16 km.h−1; p = 0.019 and p = 0.007, ηp2  = 0.21, respectively) and perceived difficulty breathing (all speeds; p = 0.023, ηp2  = 0.37) were greater in SH compared to MH, whereas leg discomfort was not influenced by hypoxic exposure. Minimal difference was observed in the twelve kinetics/kinematics variables with hypoxia (p > 0.122; ηp2 = 0.19). Running at slower speeds in combination with severe hypoxia elevates physiological and perceptual responses without a corresponding increase in ground reaction forces.

Abstract Image

运动强度和低氧暴露对跑步机跑步的生理、知觉和生物力学反应的影响
在跑步机上操控运动强度和低氧暴露的急性生理、知觉和生物力学后果被确定。在不同的天,11名被训练者在仪器跑步机上以7种跑步速度(8、10、12、14、16、18和20 km.h−1)在常氧(NM, FiO2 = 20.9%)、中度缺氧(MH, FiO2 = 16.1%)、高氧(HH, FiO2 = 14.1%)和重度缺氧(SH, FiO2 = 13.0%)下跑步45 s(中间休息135 s)。在连续20步(即跑步后~ 25秒)中收集跑步力学,同时评估生理(心率和动脉血氧饱和度)和知觉(总体感知不适、呼吸困难和腿部不适)反应。采用双向重复测量方差分析(7速× 4工况)。心率存在速度与条件的交互作用(p = 0.045, ηp2 = 0.22), 8 km.h−1时,NM、MH和HH值低于SH(125±12,125±11,128±12 vs 132±10 b.m min−1)。总体感觉不适(8和16 km.h−1;P = 0.019和P = 0.007, η P = 0.21)和感知呼吸困难(所有速度;p = 0.023, ηp = 0.37),而腿部不适不受缺氧暴露的影响。缺氧时12个动力学/运动学变量的差异极小(p > 0.122;ηp2 = 0.19)。以较慢的速度跑步与严重缺氧相结合会提高生理和感知反应,而不会相应增加地面反作用力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信