Impaired Decision-Making and Skin Conductance Responses Are Associated with Reward and Punishment Sensitivity in Individuals with Severe Alcohol Use Disorder.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Warren B Logge, Kirsten C Morley, Paul S Haber, Andrew J Baillie
{"title":"Impaired Decision-Making and Skin Conductance Responses Are Associated with Reward and Punishment Sensitivity in Individuals with Severe Alcohol Use Disorder.","authors":"Warren B Logge,&nbsp;Kirsten C Morley,&nbsp;Paul S Haber,&nbsp;Andrew J Baillie","doi":"10.1159/000529156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) have difficulties regulating alcohol consumption, despite adverse drinking-related consequences. This may be due to incapacity incorporating previous negative feedback from drinking, resulting in impaired decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed whether decision-making is impaired in participants with AUD related to severity of AUD, indexed by severe negative drinking consequences using the Drinkers Inventory of Consequences (DrInC) and reward and punishment sensitivity with the Behavioural Inhibition System Behavioural Activation System (BIS BAS) scales. 36 treatment-seeking alcohol-dependent participants completed the Iowa gambling task (IGT) with skin conductance responses (SCRs) measured continuously as an index of somatic autonomic arousal to evaluate impaired expectancy of negative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-thirds of the sample showed behavioural impairment during the IGT, with greater AUD severity related to worse performance. BIS moderated IGT performance according to severity of AUD, with increased anticipatory SCRs for those with fewer reported DrInC severe consequences. Participants with more DrInC severe consequences showed IGT deficits and reduced SCRs regardless of BIS scores. BAS-Reward was associated with increased anticipatory SCRs to disadvantageous deck choices among those with lower AUD severity, while SCRs did not differ related to AUD severity for reward outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Effective decision-making in the IGT and adaptive somatic responses were moderated by punishment sensitivity contingent on severity of AUD in these drinkers, with impairments in expectancy to negative outcomes from risky choices, including reduced somatic responses, resulting in poor decision-making processes that may help explain impaired drinking and worse drinking-related consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":19239,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychobiology","volume":"82 2","pages":"117-129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233679/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychobiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) have difficulties regulating alcohol consumption, despite adverse drinking-related consequences. This may be due to incapacity incorporating previous negative feedback from drinking, resulting in impaired decision-making.

Methods: We assessed whether decision-making is impaired in participants with AUD related to severity of AUD, indexed by severe negative drinking consequences using the Drinkers Inventory of Consequences (DrInC) and reward and punishment sensitivity with the Behavioural Inhibition System Behavioural Activation System (BIS BAS) scales. 36 treatment-seeking alcohol-dependent participants completed the Iowa gambling task (IGT) with skin conductance responses (SCRs) measured continuously as an index of somatic autonomic arousal to evaluate impaired expectancy of negative outcomes.

Results: Two-thirds of the sample showed behavioural impairment during the IGT, with greater AUD severity related to worse performance. BIS moderated IGT performance according to severity of AUD, with increased anticipatory SCRs for those with fewer reported DrInC severe consequences. Participants with more DrInC severe consequences showed IGT deficits and reduced SCRs regardless of BIS scores. BAS-Reward was associated with increased anticipatory SCRs to disadvantageous deck choices among those with lower AUD severity, while SCRs did not differ related to AUD severity for reward outcomes.

Discussion: Effective decision-making in the IGT and adaptive somatic responses were moderated by punishment sensitivity contingent on severity of AUD in these drinkers, with impairments in expectancy to negative outcomes from risky choices, including reduced somatic responses, resulting in poor decision-making processes that may help explain impaired drinking and worse drinking-related consequences.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

严重酒精使用障碍患者的决策和皮肤电导反应受损与奖罚敏感性相关
导言:酒精使用障碍(AUD)的个体难以调节酒精消费,尽管不利的饮酒相关后果。这可能是由于没有能力吸收以前饮酒的负面反馈,导致决策受损。方法:我们使用饮酒者后果清单(DrInC)和行为抑制系统行为激活系统(BIS BAS)量表评估AUD参与者的决策能力是否受损与AUD的严重程度有关,并以严重的负面饮酒后果为指标。36名寻求治疗的酒精依赖参与者完成了爱荷华赌博任务(IGT),并连续测量皮肤电导反应(SCRs)作为躯体自主觉醒的指标,以评估对负面结果的受损预期。结果:三分之二的样本在IGT期间表现出行为障碍,AUD严重程度越高,表现越差。BIS根据AUD的严重程度调节了IGT的表现,对于那些报告的DrInC严重后果较少的患者,预期scr增加。与BIS评分无关,有更多DrInC严重后果的参与者表现出IGT缺陷和scr降低。在AUD严重程度较低的人群中,bas奖励与不利牌组选择的预期scr增加有关,而scr与奖励结果的AUD严重程度无关。讨论:在这些饮酒者中,基于AUD严重程度的惩罚敏感性调节了IGT中的有效决策和适应性躯体反应,对风险选择的负面结果的预期受损,包括躯体反应减少,导致决策过程不佳,这可能有助于解释饮酒受损和更糟糕的饮酒相关后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychobiology
Neuropsychobiology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The biological approach to mental disorders continues to yield innovative findings of clinical importance, particularly if methodologies are combined. This journal collects high quality empirical studies from various experimental and clinical approaches in the fields of Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology. It features original, clinical and basic research in the fields of neurophysiology and functional imaging, neuropharmacology and neurochemistry, neuroendocrinology and neuroimmunology, genetics and their relationships with normal psychology and psychopathology. In addition, the reader will find studies on animal models of mental disorders and therapeutic interventions, and pharmacoelectroencephalographic studies. Regular reviews report new methodologic approaches, and selected case reports provide hints for future research. ''Neuropsychobiology'' is a complete record of strategies and methodologies employed to study the biological basis of mental functions including their interactions with psychological and social factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信