Frameworks for Integrating Learning Analytics With the Electronic Health Record.

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Martin V Pusic, Robert J Birnbaum, Brent Thoma, Stanley J Hamstra, Rodrigo B Cavalcanti, Eric J Warm, Anna Janssen, Tim Shaw
{"title":"Frameworks for Integrating Learning Analytics With the Electronic Health Record.","authors":"Martin V Pusic,&nbsp;Robert J Birnbaum,&nbsp;Brent Thoma,&nbsp;Stanley J Hamstra,&nbsp;Rodrigo B Cavalcanti,&nbsp;Eric J Warm,&nbsp;Anna Janssen,&nbsp;Tim Shaw","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The information systems designed to support clinical care have evolved separately from those that support health professions education. This has resulted in a considerable digital divide between patient care and education, one that poorly serves practitioners and organizations, even as learning becomes ever more important to both. In this perspective, we advocate for the enhancement of existing health information systems so that they intentionally facilitate learning. We describe three well-regarded frameworks for learning that can point toward how health care information systems can best evolve to support learning. The Master Adaptive Learner model suggests ways that the individual practitioner can best organize their activities to ensure continual self-improvement. The PDSA cycle similarly proposes actions for improvement but at a health care organization's workflow level. Senge's Five Disciplines of the Learning Organization, a more general framework from the business literature, serves to further inform how disparate information and knowledge flows can be managed for continual improvement. Our main thesis holds that these types of learning frameworks should inform the design and integration of information systems serving the health professions. An underutilized mediator of educational improvement is the ubiquitous electronic health record. The authors list learning analytic opportunities, including potential modifications of learning management systems and the electronic health record, that would enhance health professions education and support the shared goal of delivering high-quality evidence-based health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":"43 1","pages":"52-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f0/6c/ceh-43-52.PMC9973448.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract: The information systems designed to support clinical care have evolved separately from those that support health professions education. This has resulted in a considerable digital divide between patient care and education, one that poorly serves practitioners and organizations, even as learning becomes ever more important to both. In this perspective, we advocate for the enhancement of existing health information systems so that they intentionally facilitate learning. We describe three well-regarded frameworks for learning that can point toward how health care information systems can best evolve to support learning. The Master Adaptive Learner model suggests ways that the individual practitioner can best organize their activities to ensure continual self-improvement. The PDSA cycle similarly proposes actions for improvement but at a health care organization's workflow level. Senge's Five Disciplines of the Learning Organization, a more general framework from the business literature, serves to further inform how disparate information and knowledge flows can be managed for continual improvement. Our main thesis holds that these types of learning frameworks should inform the design and integration of information systems serving the health professions. An underutilized mediator of educational improvement is the ubiquitous electronic health record. The authors list learning analytic opportunities, including potential modifications of learning management systems and the electronic health record, that would enhance health professions education and support the shared goal of delivering high-quality evidence-based health care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

整合学习分析与电子健康记录的框架。
摘要:旨在支持临床护理的信息系统与支持卫生专业教育的信息系统是分开发展的。这导致了患者护理和教育之间存在相当大的数字鸿沟,尽管学习对两者都变得越来越重要,但这种鸿沟对医生和组织的服务却很差。从这个角度来看,我们主张加强现有的卫生信息系统,以便他们有意地促进学习。我们描述了三个备受推崇的学习框架,这些框架可以指出医疗保健信息系统如何最好地发展以支持学习。大师自适应学习者模型建议个体从业者可以最好地组织他们的活动,以确保持续的自我完善。PDSA循环类似地提出改进行动,但在医疗保健组织的工作流程级别。Senge的《学习型组织的五个原则》是来自商业文献的一个更一般的框架,它进一步说明了如何管理不同的信息和知识流以实现持续改进。我们的主要论文认为,这些类型的学习框架应该通知的信息系统的设计和集成服务于卫生专业。无处不在的电子健康记录是教育改进的一个未充分利用的中介。作者列出了学习分析的机会,包括学习管理系统和电子健康记录的潜在修改,这将加强卫生专业教育,并支持提供高质量循证卫生保健的共同目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信