Testing for Protein Leverage in Patients with Gastric Bypass: A Pilot Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1159/000532125
Nantli Rodriguez-Murguiaa, Juan M Malacara, Daniel Kusnir, Alberto Siniego, Dora Melendez-Rios, David Raubenheimer, Steven Simpson, Claudia Martinez-Cordero
{"title":"Testing for Protein Leverage in Patients with Gastric Bypass: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Nantli Rodriguez-Murguiaa, Juan M Malacara, Daniel Kusnir, Alberto Siniego, Dora Melendez-Rios, David Raubenheimer, Steven Simpson, Claudia Martinez-Cordero","doi":"10.1159/000532125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Protein leverage (PL) is the phenomenon whereby a dominant appetite for protein drives overconsumption of energy with a decline in the ratio of protein to fat and carbohydrate in the diet. PL has been independently verified in several randomized control trials, and its predictions are supported by diet surveillance data. Our aim in the present study was to test whether surgical intervention through gastric bypass will ameliorate the PL effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten patients with gastric bypass (2-5 years postsurgical time) were given ad libitum access to study food comprising 10%, 15%, or 25% protein and no access to other foods for 3 days while controlling food palatability and variety. Food intake was measured, and energy and nutrient intakes were calculated. Body weight, blood chemistry, lipid profile, hormones (insulin, leptin, and ghrelin), and creatinine were determined before and after each experimental period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The gastric bypass patients in our study did not show evidence for protein intake regulation as predicted under PL but ate to constant total energy intake on the 10%, 15%, and 25% protein diets with protein intake varying significantly. Patients lost weight in the three study periods, but significant weight loss was observed only on the 15% protein diet.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that gastric bypass might disengage the PL mechanism, thus ameliorating an appetite-specific mechanism that drives energy overconsumption in modern food environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8269,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000532125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Protein leverage (PL) is the phenomenon whereby a dominant appetite for protein drives overconsumption of energy with a decline in the ratio of protein to fat and carbohydrate in the diet. PL has been independently verified in several randomized control trials, and its predictions are supported by diet surveillance data. Our aim in the present study was to test whether surgical intervention through gastric bypass will ameliorate the PL effect.

Methods: Ten patients with gastric bypass (2-5 years postsurgical time) were given ad libitum access to study food comprising 10%, 15%, or 25% protein and no access to other foods for 3 days while controlling food palatability and variety. Food intake was measured, and energy and nutrient intakes were calculated. Body weight, blood chemistry, lipid profile, hormones (insulin, leptin, and ghrelin), and creatinine were determined before and after each experimental period.

Results: The gastric bypass patients in our study did not show evidence for protein intake regulation as predicted under PL but ate to constant total energy intake on the 10%, 15%, and 25% protein diets with protein intake varying significantly. Patients lost weight in the three study periods, but significant weight loss was observed only on the 15% protein diet.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that gastric bypass might disengage the PL mechanism, thus ameliorating an appetite-specific mechanism that drives energy overconsumption in modern food environments.

胃旁路术患者蛋白质杠杆作用的检测:一项初步研究。
引言:蛋白质杠杆作用(PL)是一种对蛋白质的主要欲望导致能量过度消耗,导致饮食中蛋白质与脂肪和碳水化合物的比例下降的现象。PL已经在几个随机对照试验中得到了独立验证,其预测得到了饮食监测数据的支持。我们在本研究中的目的是测试通过胃旁路手术干预是否会改善PL效果。方法:10名胃旁路术患者(术后2-5年)在控制食物适口性和多样性的同时,随意食用含有10%、15%或25%蛋白质的研究食物,3天内不食用其他食物。测量食物摄入量,计算能量和营养素摄入量。在每个实验期前后测定体重、血液化学、脂质概况、激素(胰岛素、瘦素和胃促生长素)和肌酸酐。结果:我们研究中的胃旁路患者没有显示出PL下预测的蛋白质摄入调节的证据,但在10%、15%和25%的蛋白质饮食中,蛋白质摄入变化显著,总能量摄入保持不变。患者在三个研究期间体重减轻,但仅在15%蛋白质饮食中观察到显著的体重减轻。结论:我们的研究结果表明,胃旁路可能脱离PL机制,从而改善现代食物环境中驱动能量过度消耗的食欲特异性机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism'' is a leading international peer-reviewed journal for sharing information on human nutrition, metabolism and related fields, covering the broad and multidisciplinary nature of science in nutrition and metabolism. As the official journal of both the International Union of Nutritional Sciences (IUNS) and the Federation of European Nutrition Societies (FENS), the journal has a high visibility among both researchers and users of research outputs, including policy makers, across Europe and around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信