Penta- and hexavalent vaccination of extremely and very-to-moderate preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks and/or under 1500 g: A systematic literature review.

IF 4.8 4区 医学
Markus Knuf, Marie-Laure Charkaluk, Phung Nguyen The Nguyen, Ignacio Salamanca de la Cueva, Petra Köbrunner, Lauren Mason, Maurine Duchenne, Valérie Berlaimont
{"title":"Penta- and hexavalent vaccination of extremely and very-to-moderate preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks and/or under 1500 g: A systematic literature review.","authors":"Markus Knuf, Marie-Laure Charkaluk, Phung Nguyen The Nguyen, Ignacio Salamanca de la Cueva, Petra Köbrunner, Lauren Mason, Maurine Duchenne, Valérie Berlaimont","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2191575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Debate regarding vaccinating high-risk infants with penta- and hexavalent vaccines persists, despite their good immunogenicity and acceptable safety profile in healthy full-term infants. We report the findings of a systematic literature search that aimed to present data on the immunogenicity, efficacy, effectiveness, safety, impact, compliance and completion of penta- and hexavalent vaccination in high-risk infants, including premature newborns. Data from the 14 studies included in the review showed that the immunogenicity and the safety profile of penta- and hexavalent vaccines in preterm infants was generally similar to those seen in full-term infants, with the exception of an increase in cardiorespiratory adverse events such as apnea, bradycardia and desaturation following vaccination in preterm infants. Despite recommendations of vaccinating preterm infants according to their actual age, and the relatively high completion rate of the primary immunization schedule, vaccination was often delayed, increasing the vulnerability of this high-risk population to vaccine-preventable diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":13058,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"19 1","pages":"2191575"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/b3/KHVI_19_2191575.PMC10120554.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2191575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Debate regarding vaccinating high-risk infants with penta- and hexavalent vaccines persists, despite their good immunogenicity and acceptable safety profile in healthy full-term infants. We report the findings of a systematic literature search that aimed to present data on the immunogenicity, efficacy, effectiveness, safety, impact, compliance and completion of penta- and hexavalent vaccination in high-risk infants, including premature newborns. Data from the 14 studies included in the review showed that the immunogenicity and the safety profile of penta- and hexavalent vaccines in preterm infants was generally similar to those seen in full-term infants, with the exception of an increase in cardiorespiratory adverse events such as apnea, bradycardia and desaturation following vaccination in preterm infants. Despite recommendations of vaccinating preterm infants according to their actual age, and the relatively high completion rate of the primary immunization schedule, vaccination was often delayed, increasing the vulnerability of this high-risk population to vaccine-preventable diseases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

34周以下和/或1500克以下出生的极重度和极中度早产儿的五价和六价疫苗接种:一项系统文献综述。
尽管五价和六价疫苗在健康足月婴儿中具有良好的免疫原性和可接受的安全性,但关于为高危婴儿接种五价和六价疫苗的争论仍在继续。我们报告了一项系统文献检索的结果,旨在提供高危婴儿(包括早产儿)五价和六价疫苗接种的免疫原性、疗效、有效性、安全性、影响、依从性和完成情况的数据。综述中包括的14项研究的数据显示,五价和六价疫苗在早产儿中的免疫原性和安全性通常与在足月婴儿中看到的相似,只是早产儿接种疫苗后呼吸暂停、心动过缓和去饱和等心肺不良事件增加。尽管建议根据早产儿的实际年龄为其接种疫苗,并且初级免疫计划的完成率相对较高,但疫苗接种往往被推迟,增加了这一高危人群对疫苗可预防疾病的脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-IMMUNOLOGY
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: (formerly Human Vaccines; issn 1554-8619) Vaccine research and development is extending its reach beyond the prevention of bacterial or viral diseases. There are experimental vaccines for immunotherapeutic purposes and for applications outside of infectious diseases, in diverse fields such as cancer, autoimmunity, allergy, Alzheimer’s and addiction. Many of these vaccines and immunotherapeutics should become available in the next two decades, with consequent benefit for human health. Continued advancement in this field will benefit from a forum that can (A) help to promote interest by keeping investigators updated, and (B) enable an exchange of ideas regarding the latest progress in the many topics pertaining to vaccines and immunotherapeutics. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics provides such a forum. It is published monthly in a format that is accessible to a wide international audience in the academic, industrial and public sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信