Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning.

Oeslle Lucena, Pedro Borges, Jorge Cardoso, Keyoumars Ashkan, Rachel Sparks, Sebastien Ourselin
{"title":"Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning.","authors":"Oeslle Lucena,&nbsp;Pedro Borges,&nbsp;Jorge Cardoso,&nbsp;Keyoumars Ashkan,&nbsp;Rachel Sparks,&nbsp;Sebastien Ourselin","doi":"10.3389/fradi.2022.866974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying white matter (WM) tracts to locate eloquent areas for preoperative surgical planning is a challenging task. Manual WM tract annotations are often used but they are time-consuming, suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability, and noise intrinsic to diffusion MRI may make manual interpretation difficult. As a result, in clinical practice direct electrical stimulation is necessary to precisely locate WM tracts during surgery. A measure of WM tract segmentation unreliability could be important to guide surgical planning and operations. In this study, we use deep learning to perform reliable tract segmentation in combination with uncertainty quantification to measure segmentation unreliability. We use a 3D U-Net to segment white matter tracts. We then estimate model and data uncertainty using test time dropout and test time augmentation, respectively. We use a volume-based calibration approach to compute representative predicted probabilities from the estimated uncertainties. In our findings, we obtain a Dice of ≈0.82 which is comparable to the state-of-the-art for multi-label segmentation and Hausdorff distance <10<i>mm</i>. We demonstrate a high positive correlation between volume variance and segmentation errors, which indicates a good measure of reliability for tract segmentation ad uncertainty estimation. Finally, we show that calibrated predicted volumes are more likely to encompass the ground truth segmentation volume than uncalibrated predicted volumes. This study is a step toward more informed and reliable WM tract segmentation for clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":73101,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10365092/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2022.866974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Identifying white matter (WM) tracts to locate eloquent areas for preoperative surgical planning is a challenging task. Manual WM tract annotations are often used but they are time-consuming, suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability, and noise intrinsic to diffusion MRI may make manual interpretation difficult. As a result, in clinical practice direct electrical stimulation is necessary to precisely locate WM tracts during surgery. A measure of WM tract segmentation unreliability could be important to guide surgical planning and operations. In this study, we use deep learning to perform reliable tract segmentation in combination with uncertainty quantification to measure segmentation unreliability. We use a 3D U-Net to segment white matter tracts. We then estimate model and data uncertainty using test time dropout and test time augmentation, respectively. We use a volume-based calibration approach to compute representative predicted probabilities from the estimated uncertainties. In our findings, we obtain a Dice of ≈0.82 which is comparable to the state-of-the-art for multi-label segmentation and Hausdorff distance <10mm. We demonstrate a high positive correlation between volume variance and segmentation errors, which indicates a good measure of reliability for tract segmentation ad uncertainty estimation. Finally, we show that calibrated predicted volumes are more likely to encompass the ground truth segmentation volume than uncalibrated predicted volumes. This study is a step toward more informed and reliable WM tract segmentation for clinical decision-making.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用于术前规划的信息可靠的尿道分割。
识别白质束以确定术前手术计划的有效区域是一项具有挑战性的任务。人工WM束注释是常用的方法,但它们耗时长,且存在区域间和区域内的可变性,弥散性MRI固有的噪声可能使人工解释变得困难。因此,在临床实践中,直接电刺激是手术中精确定位WM束的必要条件。WM束分割不可靠性的测量对指导手术计划和操作具有重要意义。在本研究中,我们使用深度学习进行可靠的通道分割,并结合不确定度量化来衡量分割的不可靠性。我们用三维U-Net来分割白质束。然后,我们分别使用测试时间差和测试时间增量来估计模型和数据的不确定性。我们使用基于体积的校准方法从估计的不确定性中计算具有代表性的预测概率。在我们的研究中,我们得到了一个≈0.82的Dice,这与多标签分割和豪斯多夫距离mm的最新技术相当。我们证明了体积方差和分割误差之间的高度正相关,这表明了一个很好的方法来分割和不确定性估计的可靠性。最后,我们表明校准的预测体积比未校准的预测体积更有可能包含地面真实分割体积。这项研究为临床决策提供了更明智和可靠的WM束分割。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信