Radiomics combined with transcriptomics to predict response to immunotherapy from patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced NSCLC.

Amine Bouhamama, Benjamin Leporq, Khuram Faraz, Jean-Philippe Foy, Maxime Boussageon, Maurice Pérol, Sandra Ortiz-Cuaran, François Ghiringhelli, Pierre Saintigny, Olivier Beuf, Frank Pilleul
{"title":"Radiomics combined with transcriptomics to predict response to immunotherapy from patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced NSCLC.","authors":"Amine Bouhamama,&nbsp;Benjamin Leporq,&nbsp;Khuram Faraz,&nbsp;Jean-Philippe Foy,&nbsp;Maxime Boussageon,&nbsp;Maurice Pérol,&nbsp;Sandra Ortiz-Cuaran,&nbsp;François Ghiringhelli,&nbsp;Pierre Saintigny,&nbsp;Olivier Beuf,&nbsp;Frank Pilleul","doi":"10.3389/fradi.2023.1168448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In this study, we aim to build radiomics and multiomics models based on transcriptomics and radiomics to predict the response from patients treated with the PD-L1 inhibitor.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred and ninety-five patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were included. For all patients, 342 radiomic features were extracted from pretreatment computed tomography scans. The training set was built with 110 patients treated at the Léon Bérard Cancer Center. An independent validation cohort was built with the 85 patients treated in Dijon. The two sets were dichotomized into two classes, patients with disease control and those considered non-responders, in order to predict the disease control at 3 months. Various models were trained with different feature selection methods, and different classifiers were evaluated to build the models. In a second exploratory step, we used transcriptomics to enrich the database and develop a multiomic signature of response to immunotherapy in a 54-patient subgroup. Finally, we considered the HOT/COLD status. We first trained a radiomic model to predict the HOT/COLD status and then prototyped a hybrid model integrating radiomics and the HOT/COLD status to predict the response to immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiomic signature for 3 months' progression-free survival (PFS) classification: The most predictive model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.94 on the training set and 0.65 on the external validation set. This model was obtained with the <i>t</i>-test selection method and with a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Multiomic signature for PFS classification: The most predictive model had an AUROC of 0.95 on the training set and 0.99 on the validation set. Radiomic model to predict the HOT/COLD status: the most predictive model had an AUROC of 0.93 on the training set and 0.86 on the validation set. HOT/COLD radiomic hybrid model for PFS classification: the most predictive model had an AUROC of 0.93 on the training set and 0.90 on the validation set.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, radiomics could be used to predict the response to immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. The use of transcriptomics or the HOT/COLD status, together with radiomics, may improve the working of the prediction models.</p>","PeriodicalId":73101,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10365090/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2023.1168448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: In this study, we aim to build radiomics and multiomics models based on transcriptomics and radiomics to predict the response from patients treated with the PD-L1 inhibitor.

Materials and methods: One hundred and ninety-five patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were included. For all patients, 342 radiomic features were extracted from pretreatment computed tomography scans. The training set was built with 110 patients treated at the Léon Bérard Cancer Center. An independent validation cohort was built with the 85 patients treated in Dijon. The two sets were dichotomized into two classes, patients with disease control and those considered non-responders, in order to predict the disease control at 3 months. Various models were trained with different feature selection methods, and different classifiers were evaluated to build the models. In a second exploratory step, we used transcriptomics to enrich the database and develop a multiomic signature of response to immunotherapy in a 54-patient subgroup. Finally, we considered the HOT/COLD status. We first trained a radiomic model to predict the HOT/COLD status and then prototyped a hybrid model integrating radiomics and the HOT/COLD status to predict the response to immunotherapy.

Results: Radiomic signature for 3 months' progression-free survival (PFS) classification: The most predictive model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.94 on the training set and 0.65 on the external validation set. This model was obtained with the t-test selection method and with a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Multiomic signature for PFS classification: The most predictive model had an AUROC of 0.95 on the training set and 0.99 on the validation set. Radiomic model to predict the HOT/COLD status: the most predictive model had an AUROC of 0.93 on the training set and 0.86 on the validation set. HOT/COLD radiomic hybrid model for PFS classification: the most predictive model had an AUROC of 0.93 on the training set and 0.90 on the validation set.

Conclusion: In conclusion, radiomics could be used to predict the response to immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. The use of transcriptomics or the HOT/COLD status, together with radiomics, may improve the working of the prediction models.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

放射组学联合转录组学预测PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗晚期NSCLC患者对免疫治疗的反应
在这项研究中,我们旨在建立基于转录组学和放射组学的放射组学和多组学模型,以预测PD-L1抑制剂治疗患者的反应。材料和方法:纳入195例接受PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗的患者。对于所有患者,从预处理计算机断层扫描中提取了342个放射学特征。这个训练集是由110名在lsamon bsamard癌症中心接受治疗的患者组成的。对在第戎接受治疗的85名患者建立了一个独立的验证队列。将两组患者分为疾病控制组和无反应组,以预测3个月时疾病控制情况。使用不同的特征选择方法训练不同的模型,并评估不同的分类器来构建模型。在第二个探索性步骤中,我们使用转录组学来丰富数据库,并在54名患者亚组中开发对免疫治疗反应的多组学特征。最后,我们考虑了HOT/COLD状态。我们首先训练了一个放射组学模型来预测HOT/COLD状态,然后构建了一个结合放射组学和HOT/COLD状态的混合模型来预测免疫治疗的反应。结果:3个月无进展生存期(PFS)分类的放射学特征:最具预测性的模型在训练集上的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.94,在外部验证集上为0.65。该模型采用t检验选择法和支持向量机(SVM)分类器得到。PFS分类的多组特征:最具预测性的模型在训练集上的AUROC为0.95,在验证集上的AUROC为0.99。Radiomic模型预测HOT/COLD状态:最具预测性的模型在训练集上的AUROC为0.93,在验证集上的AUROC为0.86。用于PFS分类的HOT/COLD放射混合模型:最具预测性的模型在训练集上的AUROC为0.93,在验证集上的AUROC为0.90。结论:放射组学可用于预测非小细胞肺癌患者对免疫治疗的反应。使用转录组学或HOT/COLD状态,以及放射组学,可能会改善预测模型的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信