Diagnosis and management of cardiometabolic disease after spinal cord injury: Identifying gaps in physician training and practices.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2023.2235744
Chinenye Christa Nnoromele, Du Pham, Felicia Skelton, Ryan Solinsky
{"title":"Diagnosis and management of cardiometabolic disease after spinal cord injury: Identifying gaps in physician training and practices.","authors":"Chinenye Christa Nnoromele, Du Pham, Felicia Skelton, Ryan Solinsky","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2235744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Cardiometabolic disease (CMD) frequently occurs in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), with growing awareness surrounding the expansive scope of this problem. As CMD has significant morbidity and mortality, early guidelines-based screening and management have been established. However, the extent to which these guidelines have been adopted are unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe physicians' screening and management pattern for CMD in patients with SCI, as compared to SCI-specific CMD screening guidelines, and elucidate variables linked to screening and management patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SCI medicine-boarded physicians were surveyed on screening timing for CMD following acute SCI, along with their practice pattern and comfort level managing common CMD risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the forty-seven SCI medicine physicians that responded, 62% felt the ideal timing for CMD screening is 6 months after the acute injury. Of these same physicians, few were screening for insulin resistance and lipid dysregulation prior to 6 months after injury. In addition, less than half felt comfortable writing new prescriptions for anti-glycemic and anti-lipid medications. Furthermore, no association was found between the amount of CMD education with screening or management patterns. Finally, VA-based providers were more likely to screen for CMD within 6 months of injury and were more comfortable managing/starting anti-glycemic medications and statins.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the presence of SCI-specific CMD guidelines, gaps in screening and management practices still exist, most notably with insulin resistance and lipid dysregulation. VA-based providers generally screen and manage CMD risk factors more effectively, and further CMD education could consider emulating VA training modules.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"39-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2235744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Cardiometabolic disease (CMD) frequently occurs in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), with growing awareness surrounding the expansive scope of this problem. As CMD has significant morbidity and mortality, early guidelines-based screening and management have been established. However, the extent to which these guidelines have been adopted are unclear.

Objective: Describe physicians' screening and management pattern for CMD in patients with SCI, as compared to SCI-specific CMD screening guidelines, and elucidate variables linked to screening and management patterns.

Methods: SCI medicine-boarded physicians were surveyed on screening timing for CMD following acute SCI, along with their practice pattern and comfort level managing common CMD risk factors.

Results: Of the forty-seven SCI medicine physicians that responded, 62% felt the ideal timing for CMD screening is 6 months after the acute injury. Of these same physicians, few were screening for insulin resistance and lipid dysregulation prior to 6 months after injury. In addition, less than half felt comfortable writing new prescriptions for anti-glycemic and anti-lipid medications. Furthermore, no association was found between the amount of CMD education with screening or management patterns. Finally, VA-based providers were more likely to screen for CMD within 6 months of injury and were more comfortable managing/starting anti-glycemic medications and statins.

Conclusions: Despite the presence of SCI-specific CMD guidelines, gaps in screening and management practices still exist, most notably with insulin resistance and lipid dysregulation. VA-based providers generally screen and manage CMD risk factors more effectively, and further CMD education could consider emulating VA training modules.

脊髓损伤后心脏代谢疾病的诊断和管理:识别医生培训和实践中的差距。
背景:心脏代谢疾病(CMD)经常发生在脊髓损伤(SCI)患者中,人们越来越意识到这一问题的广泛范围。由于CMD具有显著的发病率和死亡率,因此建立了基于早期指南的筛查和管理。然而,这些指导方针的采纳程度尚不清楚。目的:描述医生对脊髓损伤患者CMD的筛查和管理模式,与SCI特异性CMD筛查指南进行比较,并阐明与筛查和管理模式相关的变量。方法:调查脊髓损伤医学医师急性脊髓损伤后的CMD筛查时机,以及他们的实践模式和对常见CMD危险因素的管理舒适度。结果:在47名接受调查的脊髓损伤内科医生中,62%的医生认为CMD筛查的理想时机是急性损伤后6个月。在这些医生中,很少有人在受伤后6个月前筛查胰岛素抵抗和脂质失调。此外,不到一半的人愿意开新的降糖和抗脂药物处方。此外,没有发现CMD教育数量与筛查或管理模式之间的关联。最后,基于va的提供者更有可能在受伤后6个月内筛查CMD,并且更容易管理/开始使用降糖药物和他汀类药物。结论:尽管存在sci特异性CMD指南,但筛查和管理实践仍然存在差距,最明显的是胰岛素抵抗和脂质失调。基于VA的提供商通常更有效地筛查和管理CMD风险因素,进一步的CMD教育可以考虑模仿VA培训模块。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信