Relative to females, male rats are more willing to forego obtaining sucrose reward in order to prevent harm to their cage mate.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-02 DOI:10.1007/s00213-023-06435-2
Evan M Hess, Marco Venniro, Todd D Gould
{"title":"Relative to females, male rats are more willing to forego obtaining sucrose reward in order to prevent harm to their cage mate.","authors":"Evan M Hess, Marco Venniro, Todd D Gould","doi":"10.1007/s00213-023-06435-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Empathy, or the ability to perceive, share, and act upon the emotions of another, is a crucial social skill and is dysfunctional in autism and schizophrenia. While the complexities of human empathy are difficult to model in rodents, behavioral paradigms utilizing rats which study decision-making in social contexts may provide a translational framework for assessing biological, pharmacotherapeutic, and environmental interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Modify and expand upon the three-session rat harm aversion task, which measures the willingness of rats to cease pressing a lever that earns them sucrose reward but delivers a shock to their cage mate. We sought to test the sustainability of harm aversion across seven sessions in male and female rats.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Same-sex pair-housed rats were assigned as either the observer, which had access to the lever, or the demonstrator, which would receive shocks. After training the observer to press the lever to receive sucrose pellets, the demonstrator was placed into an adjacent chamber at which point lever responses would also deliver a shock. If the observer did not press the lever, no shock and no sucrose was delivered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A sex difference in harm aversion was observed with female rats having significantly higher response rates and decreased response latencies across the seven test sessions, thus delivering more shocks and obtaining more sucrose, relative to males.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data demonstrate that male rats sustain harm aversion to a greater extent relative to females.</p>","PeriodicalId":20783,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"965-978"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06435-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Empathy, or the ability to perceive, share, and act upon the emotions of another, is a crucial social skill and is dysfunctional in autism and schizophrenia. While the complexities of human empathy are difficult to model in rodents, behavioral paradigms utilizing rats which study decision-making in social contexts may provide a translational framework for assessing biological, pharmacotherapeutic, and environmental interventions.

Objectives: Modify and expand upon the three-session rat harm aversion task, which measures the willingness of rats to cease pressing a lever that earns them sucrose reward but delivers a shock to their cage mate. We sought to test the sustainability of harm aversion across seven sessions in male and female rats.

Methods: Same-sex pair-housed rats were assigned as either the observer, which had access to the lever, or the demonstrator, which would receive shocks. After training the observer to press the lever to receive sucrose pellets, the demonstrator was placed into an adjacent chamber at which point lever responses would also deliver a shock. If the observer did not press the lever, no shock and no sucrose was delivered.

Results: A sex difference in harm aversion was observed with female rats having significantly higher response rates and decreased response latencies across the seven test sessions, thus delivering more shocks and obtaining more sucrose, relative to males.

Conclusions: These data demonstrate that male rats sustain harm aversion to a greater extent relative to females.

与雌鼠相比,雄鼠更愿意放弃获得蔗糖奖励,以防止伤害笼中的同伴。
理论依据:移情,即感知、分享他人情绪并根据他人情绪采取行动的能力,是一种重要的社交技能,自闭症和精神分裂症患者的移情能力会出现障碍。虽然人类共情的复杂性很难在啮齿类动物中建立模型,但利用大鼠研究社会背景下决策的行为范式可以为评估生物、药物治疗和环境干预提供一个转化框架:修改并扩展大鼠伤害规避任务的三个阶段,该任务用于测量大鼠是否愿意停止按下可获得蔗糖奖励但会给笼中同伴带来电击的杠杆。我们试图测试雄性和雌性大鼠在七个环节中伤害厌恶的持续性:方法:同性配对饲养的大鼠被指定为观察者或示范者,观察者可以使用杠杆,示范者则会受到电击。在训练观察者按下杠杆以获得蔗糖颗粒后,将示范者放入相邻的密室,此时杠杆反应也会产生电击。如果观察者没有按下杠杆,则不会受到电击,也不会得到蔗糖:结果:观察到雌性大鼠在伤害厌恶方面存在性别差异,在七个测试环节中,雌性大鼠的反应率显著高于雄性大鼠,而反应潜伏期则显著低于雄性大鼠,因此相对于雄性大鼠,雌性大鼠受到的电击更多,获得的蔗糖也更多:这些数据表明,相对于雌性大鼠,雄性大鼠对伤害的厌恶程度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology
Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
257
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Behavioural Pharmacology Society (EBPS) Psychopharmacology is an international journal that covers the broad topic of elucidating mechanisms by which drugs affect behavior. The scope of the journal encompasses the following fields: Human Psychopharmacology: Experimental This section includes manuscripts describing the effects of drugs on mood, behavior, cognition and physiology in humans. The journal encourages submissions that involve brain imaging, genetics, neuroendocrinology, and developmental topics. Usually manuscripts in this section describe studies conducted under controlled conditions, but occasionally descriptive or observational studies are also considered. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Translational This section comprises studies addressing the broad intersection of drugs and psychiatric illness. This includes not only clinical trials and studies of drug usage and metabolism, drug surveillance, and pharmacoepidemiology, but also work utilizing the entire range of clinically relevant methodologies, including neuroimaging, pharmacogenetics, cognitive science, biomarkers, and others. Work directed toward the translation of preclinical to clinical knowledge is especially encouraged. The key feature of submissions to this section is that they involve a focus on clinical aspects. Preclinical psychopharmacology: Behavioral and Neural This section considers reports on the effects of compounds with defined chemical structures on any aspect of behavior, in particular when correlated with neurochemical effects, in species other than humans. Manuscripts containing neuroscientific techniques in combination with behavior are welcome. We encourage reports of studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action, at the behavioral and molecular levels. Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Translational This section considers manuscripts that enhance the confidence in a central mechanism that could be of therapeutic value for psychiatric or neurological patients, using disease-relevant preclinical models and tests, or that report on preclinical manipulations and challenges that have the potential to be translated to the clinic. Studies aiming at the refinement of preclinical models based upon clinical findings (back-translation) will also be considered. The journal particularly encourages submissions that integrate measures of target tissue exposure, activity on the molecular target and/or modulation of the targeted biochemical pathways. Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Molecular, Genetic and Epigenetic This section focuses on the molecular and cellular actions of neuropharmacological agents / drugs, and the identification / validation of drug targets affecting the CNS in health and disease. We particularly encourage studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action at the molecular level. Manuscripts containing evidence for genetic or epigenetic effects on neurochemistry or behavior are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信