Concealing, Tolerating, and Adjusting to Emotions in Obsessive-Compulsive and Anxiety Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.1 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Carla P Loureiro, Emma Thompson, Luana D Laurito, Maria E Moreira-de-Oliveira, Rafaela V Dias, Gabriela B de Menezes, Leonardo F Fontenelle
{"title":"Concealing, Tolerating, and Adjusting to Emotions in Obsessive-Compulsive and Anxiety Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Carla P Loureiro,&nbsp;Emma Thompson,&nbsp;Luana D Laurito,&nbsp;Maria E Moreira-de-Oliveira,&nbsp;Rafaela V Dias,&nbsp;Gabriela B de Menezes,&nbsp;Leonardo F Fontenelle","doi":"10.47626/2237-6089-2023-0652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although research has shown that mood and anxiety disorders manifest disturbed emotion regulation, it is unclear whether anxiety disorders differ between each other in terms of their emotion regulation strategies. In the present study, we investigated whether patients with anxiety disorders present different affective styles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed affective styles of 32 obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients, 29 social anxiety disorder (SAD) patients, 29 panic disorder (PD) patients, and 20 healthy controls through the Affective Style Questionnaire (ASQ). A multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) was performed to compare the affective styles across groups (OCD, SAD, PD and control), while controlling for depression, anxiety symptoms and age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MANCOVA revealed a significant, small-medium, main effect of diagnostic group on affective styles. The planned contrasts revealed that OCD and SAD patients reported significantly lower scores for \"tolerance\" (ASQ-T) compared to healthy controls group. There were no differences between PD group and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings provide evidence that OCD and SAD have difficulty tolerating strong emotions existing in the present moment in an open and non-defensive way.</p>","PeriodicalId":46305,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2023-0652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although research has shown that mood and anxiety disorders manifest disturbed emotion regulation, it is unclear whether anxiety disorders differ between each other in terms of their emotion regulation strategies. In the present study, we investigated whether patients with anxiety disorders present different affective styles.

Methods: We assessed affective styles of 32 obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients, 29 social anxiety disorder (SAD) patients, 29 panic disorder (PD) patients, and 20 healthy controls through the Affective Style Questionnaire (ASQ). A multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) was performed to compare the affective styles across groups (OCD, SAD, PD and control), while controlling for depression, anxiety symptoms and age.

Results: The MANCOVA revealed a significant, small-medium, main effect of diagnostic group on affective styles. The planned contrasts revealed that OCD and SAD patients reported significantly lower scores for "tolerance" (ASQ-T) compared to healthy controls group. There were no differences between PD group and healthy controls.

Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence that OCD and SAD have difficulty tolerating strong emotions existing in the present moment in an open and non-defensive way.

在强迫和焦虑障碍中隐藏、容忍和调整情绪:一项横断面研究。
背景:虽然研究表明情绪障碍和焦虑障碍均表现出情绪调节障碍,但目前尚不清楚焦虑障碍在情绪调节策略方面是否存在差异。在本研究中,我们调查了焦虑障碍患者是否存在不同的情感风格。方法:采用情感风格问卷(ASQ)对32例强迫症(OCD)患者、29例社交焦虑障碍(SAD)患者、29例惊恐障碍(PD)患者和20例健康对照进行情感风格评估。采用多变量协方差分析(MANCOVA)比较各组(OCD、SAD、PD和对照组)的情感风格,同时控制抑郁、焦虑症状和年龄。结果:MANCOVA显示诊断组对情感风格有显著的、中小型的、主要的影响。计划对比显示,强迫症和SAD患者报告的“耐受性”(ASQ-T)得分明显低于健康对照组。PD组与健康对照组无差异。结论:我们的研究结果提供了证据,证明OCD和SAD难以以开放和非防御的方式容忍存在于当下的强烈情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信