Cannabis Consumers' View of Regulated Access to Recreational Cannabis: A Multisite Survey in Switzerland.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Monika Müller, Edith Paula Mészáros, Marc Walter, Lavinia Baltes-Flückiger, Marcus Herdener, Reto Auer, Gabriel Thorens, Stephane Rothen, Carlos Nordt, Daniele Zullino
{"title":"Cannabis Consumers' View of Regulated Access to Recreational Cannabis: A Multisite Survey in Switzerland.","authors":"Monika Müller,&nbsp;Edith Paula Mészáros,&nbsp;Marc Walter,&nbsp;Lavinia Baltes-Flückiger,&nbsp;Marcus Herdener,&nbsp;Reto Auer,&nbsp;Gabriel Thorens,&nbsp;Stephane Rothen,&nbsp;Carlos Nordt,&nbsp;Daniele Zullino","doi":"10.1159/000530194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is considerable effort in legalizing recreational use of cannabis globally. The successful implementation of a program of regulated access to recreational cannabis (PRAC) depends on the consumers' engagement. The aim of this study was to examine the acceptability of twelve different regulatory aspects by cannabis users including those obtaining cannabis from the illicit market and vulnerable populations such as young adults and problematic users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study is a multisite online survey conducted in Switzerland. A total of 3,132 adult Swiss residents who consumed cannabis within the previous 30 days represented the studied population. Mean age was 30.5 years, 80.5% were men, and 64.2% of the participants stated that they always or often obtain cannabis from the illicit market. We described consumers' acceptability of twelve regulatory aspects concerning THC content control, disclosure of sensitive personal data, security aspects, and follow-up procedures by applying descriptive statistics and multiple regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>THC content regulation showed most discrepancy with 89.4% of the participants stating to engage in a PRAC if five different THC contents were available as compared to 54% if only 12% THC was available. The least accepted regulatory aspect was disposal of contact details with an acceptability rate of 18.1%. Consumers mainly obtaining cannabis from the illicit market, young adults, and problematic users showed similar acceptability patterns. Participants obtaining cannabis from the illicit market were more likely to engage in a PRAC if five different THC contents were available as compared to participants obtaining cannabis from other sources (OR 1.94, 95% CI: 1.53-2.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A carefully designed PRAC that takes into account the consumers' perspective is likely to transfer them to the regulated market and to engage vulnerable populations. We cannot recommend the distribution of cannabis with only 12% THC content as this is unlikely to engage the target population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11902,"journal":{"name":"European Addiction Research","volume":"29 3","pages":"213-221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Addiction Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is considerable effort in legalizing recreational use of cannabis globally. The successful implementation of a program of regulated access to recreational cannabis (PRAC) depends on the consumers' engagement. The aim of this study was to examine the acceptability of twelve different regulatory aspects by cannabis users including those obtaining cannabis from the illicit market and vulnerable populations such as young adults and problematic users.

Methods: The current study is a multisite online survey conducted in Switzerland. A total of 3,132 adult Swiss residents who consumed cannabis within the previous 30 days represented the studied population. Mean age was 30.5 years, 80.5% were men, and 64.2% of the participants stated that they always or often obtain cannabis from the illicit market. We described consumers' acceptability of twelve regulatory aspects concerning THC content control, disclosure of sensitive personal data, security aspects, and follow-up procedures by applying descriptive statistics and multiple regression models.

Results: THC content regulation showed most discrepancy with 89.4% of the participants stating to engage in a PRAC if five different THC contents were available as compared to 54% if only 12% THC was available. The least accepted regulatory aspect was disposal of contact details with an acceptability rate of 18.1%. Consumers mainly obtaining cannabis from the illicit market, young adults, and problematic users showed similar acceptability patterns. Participants obtaining cannabis from the illicit market were more likely to engage in a PRAC if five different THC contents were available as compared to participants obtaining cannabis from other sources (OR 1.94, 95% CI: 1.53-2.46).

Conclusion: A carefully designed PRAC that takes into account the consumers' perspective is likely to transfer them to the regulated market and to engage vulnerable populations. We cannot recommend the distribution of cannabis with only 12% THC content as this is unlikely to engage the target population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

大麻消费者对管制获取休闲大麻的看法:瑞士的一项多地点调查。
导言:全球在娱乐性使用大麻合法化方面做出了相当大的努力。管制获取娱乐性大麻(PRAC)计划的成功实施取决于消费者的参与。这项研究的目的是检查大麻使用者对12个不同监管方面的可接受性,包括那些从非法市场获得大麻的人和弱势群体,如年轻人和有问题的使用者。方法:目前的研究是在瑞士进行的多地点在线调查。总共有3132名在过去30天内吸食大麻的瑞士成年居民代表了研究人群。平均年龄为30.5岁,80.5%为男性,64.2%的参与者表示他们总是或经常从非法市场获得大麻。我们运用描述性统计和多元回归模型描述了消费者对四氢大麻酚含量控制、敏感个人数据披露、安全方面和后续程序等12个监管方面的可接受程度。结果:四氢大麻酚含量调节显示出最大的差异,如果有五种不同的四氢大麻酚含量,89.4%的参与者表示会参与PRAC,而如果只有12%的四氢大麻酚含量,这一比例为54%。最不被接受的监管方面是联系方式的处理,接受率为18.1%。主要从非法市场获得大麻的消费者、年轻人和有问题的使用者表现出类似的可接受模式。与从其他来源获得大麻的参与者相比,如果有五种不同的四氢大麻酚含量,从非法市场获得大麻的参与者更有可能参与PRAC (OR 1.94, 95% CI: 1.53-2.46)。结论:考虑到消费者观点的精心设计的PRAC可能会将他们转移到受监管的市场并吸引弱势群体。我们不建议分销只有12% THC含量的大麻,因为这不太可能吸引目标人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Addiction Research
European Addiction Research SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Addiction Research'' is a unique international scientific journal for the rapid publication of innovative research covering all aspects of addiction and related disorders. Representing an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of recent data and expert opinion, it reflects the importance of a comprehensive approach to resolve the problems of substance abuse and addiction in Europe. Coverage ranges from clinical and research advances in the fields of psychiatry, biology, pharmacology and epidemiology to social, and legal implications of policy decisions. The goal is to facilitate open discussion among those interested in the scientific and clinical aspects of prevention, diagnosis and therapy as well as dealing with legal issues. An excellent range of original papers makes ‘European Addiction Research’ the forum of choice for all.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信