Félix-Antoine Savoie, David J Arpin, David E Vaillancourt
{"title":"Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Nuclear Imaging of Parkinsonian Disorders: Where do we go from here?","authors":"Félix-Antoine Savoie, David J Arpin, David E Vaillancourt","doi":"10.2174/1570159X21666230801140648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parkinsonian disorders are a heterogeneous group of incurable neurodegenerative diseases that significantly reduce quality of life and constitute a substantial economic burden. Nuclear imaging (NI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have played and continue to play a key role in research aimed at understanding and monitoring these disorders. MRI is cheaper, more accessible, nonirradiating, and better at measuring biological structures and hemodynamics than NI. NI, on the other hand, can track molecular processes, which may be crucial for the development of efficient diseasemodifying therapies. Given the strengths and weaknesses of NI and MRI, how can they best be applied to Parkinsonism research going forward? This review aims to examine the effectiveness of NI and MRI in three areas of Parkinsonism research (differential diagnosis, prodromal disease identification, and disease monitoring) to highlight where they can be most impactful. Based on the available literature, MRI can assist with differential diagnosis, prodromal disease identification, and disease monitoring as well as NI. However, more work is needed, to confirm the value of MRI for monitoring prodromal disease and predicting phenoconversion. Although NI can complement or be a substitute for MRI in all the areas covered in this review, we believe that its most meaningful impact will emerge once reliable Parkinsonian proteinopathy tracers become available. Future work in tracer development and high-field imaging will continue to influence the landscape for NI and MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":10905,"journal":{"name":"Current Neuropharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1583-1605"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11284713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159X21666230801140648","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Parkinsonian disorders are a heterogeneous group of incurable neurodegenerative diseases that significantly reduce quality of life and constitute a substantial economic burden. Nuclear imaging (NI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have played and continue to play a key role in research aimed at understanding and monitoring these disorders. MRI is cheaper, more accessible, nonirradiating, and better at measuring biological structures and hemodynamics than NI. NI, on the other hand, can track molecular processes, which may be crucial for the development of efficient diseasemodifying therapies. Given the strengths and weaknesses of NI and MRI, how can they best be applied to Parkinsonism research going forward? This review aims to examine the effectiveness of NI and MRI in three areas of Parkinsonism research (differential diagnosis, prodromal disease identification, and disease monitoring) to highlight where they can be most impactful. Based on the available literature, MRI can assist with differential diagnosis, prodromal disease identification, and disease monitoring as well as NI. However, more work is needed, to confirm the value of MRI for monitoring prodromal disease and predicting phenoconversion. Although NI can complement or be a substitute for MRI in all the areas covered in this review, we believe that its most meaningful impact will emerge once reliable Parkinsonian proteinopathy tracers become available. Future work in tracer development and high-field imaging will continue to influence the landscape for NI and MRI.
帕金森氏症是一类无法治愈的神经退行性疾病,它大大降低了患者的生活质量,并造成了巨大的经济负担。核成像(NI)和磁共振成像(MRI)在了解和监测这些疾病的研究中已经并将继续发挥关键作用。核磁共振成像比核素成像更便宜、更容易获得、无辐射,而且在测量生物结构和血液动力学方面更胜一筹。另一方面,核磁共振成像可以追踪分子过程,这对开发有效的疾病调节疗法至关重要。鉴于核磁共振成像和核磁共振成像的优缺点,如何将它们最好地应用于帕金森病的研究?本综述旨在检查核磁共振成像和核磁共振成像在帕金森病研究的三个领域(鉴别诊断、前驱疾病识别和疾病监测)中的有效性,以突出它们在哪些方面最有影响力。根据现有文献,核磁共振成像与核磁共振成像一样,可协助鉴别诊断、前驱疾病识别和疾病监测。然而,还需要更多的工作来证实核磁共振成像在监测前驱疾病和预测表型转换方面的价值。虽然核磁共振成像可在本综述所涉及的所有领域中补充或替代核磁共振成像,但我们相信,一旦可靠的帕金森蛋白病示踪剂问世,核磁共振成像将产生最有意义的影响。未来在示踪剂开发和高场成像方面的工作将继续影响 NI 和 MRI 的前景。
期刊介绍:
Current Neuropharmacology aims to provide current, comprehensive/mini reviews and guest edited issues of all areas of neuropharmacology and related matters of neuroscience. The reviews cover the fields of molecular, cellular, and systems/behavioural aspects of neuropharmacology and neuroscience.
The journal serves as a comprehensive, multidisciplinary expert forum for neuropharmacologists and neuroscientists.