Management of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis by Moroccan General Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 1.2 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Ahmed Mougui, Imane El Bouchti
{"title":"Management of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis by Moroccan General Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Ahmed Mougui, Imane El Bouchti","doi":"10.2174/1573397119666230731122645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the existence of effective treatments and prescribed therapeutic protocols, there is a lack of management of osteoporosis, resulting in increased secondary morbidity and mortality. The general practitioner (GP) is the first-line practitioner for the detection and management of osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to explore the practices, knowledge, and difficulties in postmenopausal osteoporosis management reported by GPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous questionnaire (19 questions) was created via Google Forms and distributed to 300 GPs via social networks (WhatsApp, Facebook, and Gmail). The survey results were automatically calculated on \"Google Forms\" and checked using SPSS.20 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 129 responses were received, representing a response rate of 43%. The majority of respondents were women (67.2%). The definition of osteoporosis was variable, with 51.6% defining it as a T-score of ≤-2.5 SD, 25.8% defining it as diffuse bone demineralization, and 12.1% defining it as a fracture after falling with low energy. Prolonged corticosteroid therapy was the most commonly indicated reason for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) (81.39%). The calcium phosphate balance was the most requested (90.1%). Vitamin D and calcium supplementation were reported by 74.41% and 54.26% of GPs, respectively. Fracture of the upper end of the femur was the main therapeutic indication (65.11%). Most GPs surveyed (73.3%) were unfamiliar with the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). Most of the GPs gave advice on fall prevention to their patients (83.72%), and 62.5% of GPs monitored their patients' height. Anti-osteoporosis treatment was maintained for 3 to 5 years by 44.96% of GPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our survey found that the practices and knowledge of GPs on osteoporosis vary widely and often deviate from the recommended standards. This highlights the need for more excellent education of GPs, due to their vital role in the management of osteoporosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11188,"journal":{"name":"Current rheumatology reviews","volume":" ","pages":"100-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current rheumatology reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573397119666230731122645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the existence of effective treatments and prescribed therapeutic protocols, there is a lack of management of osteoporosis, resulting in increased secondary morbidity and mortality. The general practitioner (GP) is the first-line practitioner for the detection and management of osteoporosis.

Objective: This study was conducted to explore the practices, knowledge, and difficulties in postmenopausal osteoporosis management reported by GPs.

Methods: An anonymous questionnaire (19 questions) was created via Google Forms and distributed to 300 GPs via social networks (WhatsApp, Facebook, and Gmail). The survey results were automatically calculated on "Google Forms" and checked using SPSS.20 software.

Results: A total of 129 responses were received, representing a response rate of 43%. The majority of respondents were women (67.2%). The definition of osteoporosis was variable, with 51.6% defining it as a T-score of ≤-2.5 SD, 25.8% defining it as diffuse bone demineralization, and 12.1% defining it as a fracture after falling with low energy. Prolonged corticosteroid therapy was the most commonly indicated reason for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) (81.39%). The calcium phosphate balance was the most requested (90.1%). Vitamin D and calcium supplementation were reported by 74.41% and 54.26% of GPs, respectively. Fracture of the upper end of the femur was the main therapeutic indication (65.11%). Most GPs surveyed (73.3%) were unfamiliar with the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). Most of the GPs gave advice on fall prevention to their patients (83.72%), and 62.5% of GPs monitored their patients' height. Anti-osteoporosis treatment was maintained for 3 to 5 years by 44.96% of GPs.

Conclusion: Our survey found that the practices and knowledge of GPs on osteoporosis vary widely and often deviate from the recommended standards. This highlights the need for more excellent education of GPs, due to their vital role in the management of osteoporosis.

摩洛哥全科医生对绝经后骨质疏松症的管理:一项横断面调查
背景:尽管存在有效的治疗方法和规定的治疗方案,但对骨质疏松症缺乏管理,导致继发性发病率和死亡率增加。全科医生(GP)是检测和管理骨质疏松症的一线医生:本研究旨在探讨全科医生报告的绝经后骨质疏松症管理中的做法、知识和困难:通过谷歌表格制作了一份匿名问卷(19 个问题),并通过社交网络(WhatsApp、Facebook 和 Gmail)分发给 300 名全科医生。调查结果由 "谷歌表单 "自动计算,并使用 SPSS.20 软件进行检验:共收到 129 份回复,回复率为 43%。大多数受访者为女性(67.2%)。对骨质疏松症的定义不尽相同,51.6% 的人将其定义为 T 值≤-2.5 SD,25.8% 的人将其定义为弥漫性骨质脱矿化,12.1% 的人将其定义为低能量跌倒后骨折。长期皮质类固醇治疗是测量骨矿密度(BMD)最常见的原因(81.39%)。磷酸钙平衡的要求最多(90.1%)。分别有 74.41% 和 54.26% 的全科医生表示需要补充维生素 D 和钙。股骨上端骨折是主要的治疗指征(65.11%)。大多数受访全科医生(73.3%)不熟悉骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)。大多数全科医生(83.72%)会向患者提供预防跌倒的建议,62.5%的全科医生会监测患者的身高。44.96%的全科医生将抗骨质疏松症治疗维持了3至5年:我们的调查发现,全科医生在骨质疏松症方面的做法和知识差异很大,而且经常偏离建议的标准。这突出表明,由于全科医生在骨质疏松症的管理中发挥着重要作用,因此有必要对他们进行更多的良好教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Current Rheumatology Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on rheumatology and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in rheumatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信