Implications of Physical Access Barriers for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment in Women with Mobility Disability.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Journal of Disability Policy Studies Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-10 DOI:10.1177/10442073211010124
Nicole Agaronnik, Areej El-Jawahri, Lisa Iezzoni
{"title":"Implications of Physical Access Barriers for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment in Women with Mobility Disability.","authors":"Nicole Agaronnik, Areej El-Jawahri, Lisa Iezzoni","doi":"10.1177/10442073211010124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>More than 30 years since enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act, people with disability continue to face physical access barriers, notably inaccessible medical diagnostic equipment, in clinical settings. Access barriers affect breast cancer screening and treatment for women with disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used standard diagnosis codes and natural language processing to screen electronic health records (EHRs) in a digital data repository from a large healthcare delivery system for patients with pre-existing mobility disability diagnosed with breast cancer between 2005-2017. We reviewed EHRs of 20 patients, using conventional content analysis to examine breast cancer diagnosis and treatment experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinicians noted challenges positioning patients for routine procedures including manual breast exam, screening mammography, and breast biopsies. Given challenges accommodating disability for adjuvant therapies, mastectomy was favored over breast-conserving options despite early stages of diagnosis. Notations contained little information about proactive problem-solving for arranging accommodations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Notations described physical access barriers for breast cancer detection and treatment, with limited planning for mitigating barriers. Despite 2017 promulgation of federal Standards for Accessible Medical Diagnostic Equipment, implementing these standards requires further rulemaking.</p>","PeriodicalId":46868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Disability Policy Studies","volume":"33 1","pages":"46-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307057/pdf/nihms-1764869.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Disability Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073211010124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: More than 30 years since enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act, people with disability continue to face physical access barriers, notably inaccessible medical diagnostic equipment, in clinical settings. Access barriers affect breast cancer screening and treatment for women with disability.

Methods: We used standard diagnosis codes and natural language processing to screen electronic health records (EHRs) in a digital data repository from a large healthcare delivery system for patients with pre-existing mobility disability diagnosed with breast cancer between 2005-2017. We reviewed EHRs of 20 patients, using conventional content analysis to examine breast cancer diagnosis and treatment experiences.

Results: Clinicians noted challenges positioning patients for routine procedures including manual breast exam, screening mammography, and breast biopsies. Given challenges accommodating disability for adjuvant therapies, mastectomy was favored over breast-conserving options despite early stages of diagnosis. Notations contained little information about proactive problem-solving for arranging accommodations.

Conclusions: Notations described physical access barriers for breast cancer detection and treatment, with limited planning for mitigating barriers. Despite 2017 promulgation of federal Standards for Accessible Medical Diagnostic Equipment, implementing these standards requires further rulemaking.

行动不便的妇女在乳腺癌诊断和治疗中遇到的实际障碍的影响。
目的:自《美国残疾人法案》颁布 30 多年来,残疾人在临床环境中仍然面临着实际的无障碍障碍,特别是无障碍医疗诊断设备。这些障碍影响着残疾妇女的乳腺癌筛查和治疗:我们使用标准诊断代码和自然语言处理技术,对大型医疗保健服务系统数字数据存储库中的电子健康记录(EHR)进行筛查,以了解 2005-2017 年间被诊断为乳腺癌的原有行动不便患者的情况。我们查阅了 20 名患者的电子健康记录,采用传统的内容分析法研究了乳腺癌的诊断和治疗经历:结果:临床医生注意到,在进行人工乳房检查、乳腺 X 线照相术筛查和乳腺活组织检查等常规程序时,患者的定位存在困难。鉴于残疾患者在接受辅助治疗时面临的挑战,尽管在诊断的早期阶段,乳房切除术比保乳方案更受青睐。说明中几乎没有关于主动解决问题以安排便利的信息:结论:通知书描述了乳腺癌检测和治疗的实际障碍,但对减少障碍的规划却很有限。尽管 2017 年颁布了《联邦无障碍医疗诊断设备标准》,但这些标准的实施还需要进一步的规则制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Disability Policy Studies addresses compelling, variable issues in ethics, policy, and law related to individuals with disabilities. A major focus is quantitative and qualitative policy research. Articles have implications in fields such as education, law, sociology, public health, family studies, medicine, social work, and public administration. Occasional special series discuss current problems or areas needing more in-depth research, for example, disability and aging, policy concerning families of children with disabilities, oppression and disability, school violence policies and interventions, and systems change in supporting individuals with disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信