Comparison of Alectinib/Crizotinib Data in First-Line Therapy in Patients with Anaplastic LymphomakinasePositive Nonsmall Cell Lung Carcinoma with Poor Prognostic Features for Alectinib.

Abstract

Objective: Alectinib has a much better central nervous system transmission than crizotinib in patients diagnosed with anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. We aimed to investigate alectinib's efficacy in the treatment and its place in the first-line treatment and report our real-life data.

Material and methods: The data of 38 patients who were diagnosed with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive nonsmall cell lung carcinoma in our clinic between 2016 and 2021, who did not receive any treatment before were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: Of the 19 patients who received alectinib, 14 had multiple, and 6 had pretreatment brain metastases. No newly emerging brain metastases were detected during the treatment period. The progression-free survival of patients was 23.5 ± 4.2 months, and overall survival was 24.6 ± 4.1 months. Progression was observed in 10 (52.6%) patients. Of the 19 patients who received crizotinib, 7 had multiple metastases, and brain metastases were detected in 1 patient before treatment and 6 patients during the treatment period. Progression-free survival of crizotinib patients was 17.1 ± 4.8 months and their overall survival was 26.5 ± 6.1 months. Progression was observed in 17 (89.5%) patients. The second line of alectinib could be given to 8 of these patients. Overall survival after second-line treatment of alectinib was 18.2 ± 7.0 months. Overall survival of the patients who could not receive second-line treatment of alectinib was 4.0 ± 2.0 months.

Conclusion: The progression rate was lower in alectinib than the crizotinib patients, although there were more patients with multiple metastases and brain metastases in the alectinib arm.