Effect of endodontic sealers on push-out bond strength of CAD-CAM or prefabricated fiber glass posts.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Andréa Pereira de Souza Pinto, Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França, Roberta Tarkany Basting, Cecilia Pedroso Turssi, José Joatan Rodrigues Júnior, Flávia Lucisano Botelho Amaral
{"title":"Effect of endodontic sealers on push-out bond strength of CAD-CAM or prefabricated fiber glass posts.","authors":"Andréa Pereira de Souza Pinto,&nbsp;Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França,&nbsp;Roberta Tarkany Basting,&nbsp;Cecilia Pedroso Turssi,&nbsp;José Joatan Rodrigues Júnior,&nbsp;Flávia Lucisano Botelho Amaral","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of endodontic sealer (ES) on bond strength (BS) of prefabricated or milled-CAD-CAM (computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing) glass-fiber-posts (GFP). Canals of 90 single-rooted teeth were prepared for filling by the single-cone technique with gutta-percha and one of the following ES: AH Plus (epoxy resin), Endofill (zinc-oxide and eugenol), and Bio-C Sealer (calcium-silicate). After post-space preparation, tooth-specimens were equally divided in half according to type of GFP to be used. In the half to receive milled-CAD-CAM posts, tooth specimens were molded with acrylic resin to obtain replicas. These were scanned to enable the laboratory to produce the milled-CAD-CAM GFPs (Fiber CAD Lab, Angelus) by the subtractive technique. The other half of samples received prefabricated GFPs (Exacto, Angelus) (n=15). The GFPs were cemented with dual-cure resin cement (Panavia F2.0, Kuraray). Each root was sectioned into two slices per root region (cervical, middle, apical) that were subjected to the push-out BS test, in a universal testing machine. Failure mode (FM) was classified by scores. The BS data were submitted to generalized linear model analyses, while FM was analyzed using the chi-square test (a=0.05). BS showed no significant difference among the three ES (p > 0.05). BS was significantly higher for prefabricated (mean 10.84 MPa) versus milled-CAD-CAM GFPs (mean 6.94 MPa) (p <0.0001), irrespective of ES. The majority showed mixed failures. It could be concluded that type of ES did not affect BS of GFPs to dentin, and prefabricated-GFPs had higher bond-strength than customized-milled-CAD-CAM GFPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48942,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Oral Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of endodontic sealer (ES) on bond strength (BS) of prefabricated or milled-CAD-CAM (computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing) glass-fiber-posts (GFP). Canals of 90 single-rooted teeth were prepared for filling by the single-cone technique with gutta-percha and one of the following ES: AH Plus (epoxy resin), Endofill (zinc-oxide and eugenol), and Bio-C Sealer (calcium-silicate). After post-space preparation, tooth-specimens were equally divided in half according to type of GFP to be used. In the half to receive milled-CAD-CAM posts, tooth specimens were molded with acrylic resin to obtain replicas. These were scanned to enable the laboratory to produce the milled-CAD-CAM GFPs (Fiber CAD Lab, Angelus) by the subtractive technique. The other half of samples received prefabricated GFPs (Exacto, Angelus) (n=15). The GFPs were cemented with dual-cure resin cement (Panavia F2.0, Kuraray). Each root was sectioned into two slices per root region (cervical, middle, apical) that were subjected to the push-out BS test, in a universal testing machine. Failure mode (FM) was classified by scores. The BS data were submitted to generalized linear model analyses, while FM was analyzed using the chi-square test (a=0.05). BS showed no significant difference among the three ES (p > 0.05). BS was significantly higher for prefabricated (mean 10.84 MPa) versus milled-CAD-CAM GFPs (mean 6.94 MPa) (p <0.0001), irrespective of ES. The majority showed mixed failures. It could be concluded that type of ES did not affect BS of GFPs to dentin, and prefabricated-GFPs had higher bond-strength than customized-milled-CAD-CAM GFPs.

根管密封剂对CAD-CAM或预制玻璃纤维桩推出粘结强度的影响。
本研究旨在评价根管密封剂(ES)对预制或碾磨cad - cam(计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造)玻璃纤维桩(GFP)粘结强度(BS)的影响。采用杜仲胶和AH Plus(环氧树脂)、Endofill(氧化锌和丁香酚)、Bio-C Sealer(硅酸钙)三种ES中的一种进行单锥充填技术,对90颗单根牙根管进行充填。在间隙准备后,根据所使用的GFP类型将牙标本平均分成两半。在接受铣削cad - cam桩的一半中,牙齿标本用丙烯酸树脂模塑以获得复制品。对这些材料进行扫描,使实验室能够通过减法技术生产加工后的CAD- cam gfp (Fiber CAD Lab, Angelus)。另一半样品接受预制gfp (Exacto, Angelus) (n=15)。GFPs用双固化树脂水泥(Panavia F2.0, Kuraray)进行胶结。每个根区(颈、中、根尖)被切成两片,在通用试验机中进行推出BS测试。故障模式(FM)通过评分进行分类。BS数据采用广义线性模型分析,FM数据采用卡方检验(a=0.05)。3个ES间BS差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。预制的cad - cam gfp的BS(平均10.84 MPa)明显高于碾磨的cad - cam gfp(平均6.94 MPa)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brazilian Oral Research
Brazilian Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信