Presence and grade of undertreatment of pain in children with cerebral palsy.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2023-06-02 Print Date: 2023-07-26 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2022-0124
Tamo Sultan, Christian Wong
{"title":"Presence and grade of undertreatment of pain in children with cerebral palsy.","authors":"Tamo Sultan, Christian Wong","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2022-0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate if chronic pain in children with cerebral palsy is undertreated with the current pharmacological/non-pharmacological interventions using a pain management index.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Parents of 120 children with cerebral palsy between the ages of 2-19 years from our region in Denmark answered a questionnaire about whether their child had everyday pain. When answering in pain, we inquired about pain status and pharmacological/non-pharmacological pain coping interventions. Everyday pain was viewed as chronic pain with acute exacerbations. Pain experienced was divided into worst pain (highest moments of pain intensity) and least pain (lowest moments of pain intensity). To describe and evaluate the effectiveness of pain interventions used, a pain management index was utilized. Everyday pain was assessed using a logistical regression by adjusting for age, sex, and gross motor function classification system level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>59/115 (0.51) of parents answering the questionnaire reported everyday pain. Of those, the median age was 10 years. For pain alleviation, massage was reported by parents as being used by 29/59 (0.49) children and paracetamol by 21/59 (0.36). Pain affected daily life in 44/59 (0.75). By our evaluation 44/59 (0.75) were inadequately treated for their pain. Our evaluation also revealed that 19/59 (0.32) of children in pain had inadequately treated pain combined with an undesirable intensity of least pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Half of the children with cerebral palsy experienced chronic pain according to our pain questionnaire answered by parents. Among these children three-quarters were insufficiently treated for their pain. In the same group, one-third were impacted by pain felt at both its highest and lowest moments of intensity. Massage therapy and paracetamol were the most frequently utilized pain-alleviating interventions. In our cohort, pain was undertreated and likely underdiagnose (Protocol number H-17008823).</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2022-0124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate if chronic pain in children with cerebral palsy is undertreated with the current pharmacological/non-pharmacological interventions using a pain management index.

Methods: Parents of 120 children with cerebral palsy between the ages of 2-19 years from our region in Denmark answered a questionnaire about whether their child had everyday pain. When answering in pain, we inquired about pain status and pharmacological/non-pharmacological pain coping interventions. Everyday pain was viewed as chronic pain with acute exacerbations. Pain experienced was divided into worst pain (highest moments of pain intensity) and least pain (lowest moments of pain intensity). To describe and evaluate the effectiveness of pain interventions used, a pain management index was utilized. Everyday pain was assessed using a logistical regression by adjusting for age, sex, and gross motor function classification system level.

Results: 59/115 (0.51) of parents answering the questionnaire reported everyday pain. Of those, the median age was 10 years. For pain alleviation, massage was reported by parents as being used by 29/59 (0.49) children and paracetamol by 21/59 (0.36). Pain affected daily life in 44/59 (0.75). By our evaluation 44/59 (0.75) were inadequately treated for their pain. Our evaluation also revealed that 19/59 (0.32) of children in pain had inadequately treated pain combined with an undesirable intensity of least pain.

Conclusions: Half of the children with cerebral palsy experienced chronic pain according to our pain questionnaire answered by parents. Among these children three-quarters were insufficiently treated for their pain. In the same group, one-third were impacted by pain felt at both its highest and lowest moments of intensity. Massage therapy and paracetamol were the most frequently utilized pain-alleviating interventions. In our cohort, pain was undertreated and likely underdiagnose (Protocol number H-17008823).

脑瘫儿童疼痛治疗不足的情况和程度。
目的利用疼痛管理指数调查目前的药物/非药物干预措施是否对脑瘫儿童的慢性疼痛治疗不足:方法:丹麦本地区 120 名 2-19 岁脑瘫儿童的家长回答了关于孩子是否有日常疼痛的问卷。在回答疼痛时,我们询问了疼痛状况和药物/非药物疼痛应对干预措施。日常疼痛被视为伴有急性加重的慢性疼痛。所经历的疼痛分为最严重的疼痛(疼痛强度最高的时刻)和最轻微的疼痛(疼痛强度最低的时刻)。为了描述和评估疼痛干预措施的有效性,采用了疼痛管理指数。通过对年龄、性别和粗大运动功能分类系统水平进行调整,利用逻辑回归对日常疼痛进行了评估:59/115(0.51)名回答问卷的家长报告了日常疼痛。其中,年龄中位数为 10 岁。在缓解疼痛方面,29/59(0.49)名儿童的家长表示曾使用过按摩,21/59(0.36)名儿童使用过扑热息痛。44/59(0.75)名儿童因疼痛影响了日常生活。根据我们的评估,44/59(0.75)名儿童的疼痛未得到适当治疗。我们的评估还显示,19/59(0.32)名疼痛患儿的疼痛未得到充分治疗,且疼痛强度最低:结论:根据我们由家长回答的疼痛问卷,半数脑瘫儿童经历过慢性疼痛。在这些儿童中,四分之三的儿童没有得到充分的疼痛治疗。在同一群体中,三分之一的儿童在疼痛强度最高和最低时都会受到影响。按摩疗法和扑热息痛是最常用的缓解疼痛干预措施。在我们的队列中,疼痛治疗不足,而且很可能诊断不足(方案编号:H-17008823)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信