The grammaticality judgement of inflectional morphology in children with and without Developmental Language Disorder.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics Pub Date : 2024-07-02 Epub Date: 2023-07-21 DOI:10.1080/02699206.2023.2236768
Samuel D Calder, Denis Visentin, Mary Claessen, Lillian Hollingsworth, Susan Ebbels, Karen Smith-Lock, Suze Leitão
{"title":"The grammaticality judgement of inflectional morphology in children with and without Developmental Language Disorder.","authors":"Samuel D Calder, Denis Visentin, Mary Claessen, Lillian Hollingsworth, Susan Ebbels, Karen Smith-Lock, Suze Leitão","doi":"10.1080/02699206.2023.2236768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore the clinical potential of grammaticality judgement tasks, this study investigated whether a Grammaticality Judgment Task (GJT) of inflectional morphology could differentiate between a clinically selected sample of children with DLD and children in mainstream (i.e. regular education) schools. We also explored the relationship between grammaticality judgement and measures of receptive vocabulary, receptive grammar, and nonword repetition. Children with DLD (<i>n</i> = 30; age range = 69-80 months) and mainstream children in Pre-primary, Year 1, and Year 2 (<i>n =</i> 89, age range = 61-96 months) were assessed on a GJT of regular past tense, third person singular, and possessive <i>'s</i>. The GJT was sensitive to developmental differences in mainstream children and differentiated children with DLD from Year 1 and 2 mainstream children, with DLD results consistent with a one-year delay in performance compared to controls. The GJT was the strongest discriminator of membership to a clinically selected sample of children with DLD (ROC curve analysis, area under the curve = 88%). Receptive grammar, receptive vocabulary, and nonword repetition were related to performance on the GJT. The grammaticality judgement of inflectional morphology shows promise as a reliable indicator of DLD and a measure sensitive to developmental differences in mainstream children. GJTs should continue to be explored for clinical application as a potential tool for both assessment and intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":49219,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics","volume":" ","pages":"676-691"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2023.2236768","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore the clinical potential of grammaticality judgement tasks, this study investigated whether a Grammaticality Judgment Task (GJT) of inflectional morphology could differentiate between a clinically selected sample of children with DLD and children in mainstream (i.e. regular education) schools. We also explored the relationship between grammaticality judgement and measures of receptive vocabulary, receptive grammar, and nonword repetition. Children with DLD (n = 30; age range = 69-80 months) and mainstream children in Pre-primary, Year 1, and Year 2 (n = 89, age range = 61-96 months) were assessed on a GJT of regular past tense, third person singular, and possessive 's. The GJT was sensitive to developmental differences in mainstream children and differentiated children with DLD from Year 1 and 2 mainstream children, with DLD results consistent with a one-year delay in performance compared to controls. The GJT was the strongest discriminator of membership to a clinically selected sample of children with DLD (ROC curve analysis, area under the curve = 88%). Receptive grammar, receptive vocabulary, and nonword repetition were related to performance on the GJT. The grammaticality judgement of inflectional morphology shows promise as a reliable indicator of DLD and a measure sensitive to developmental differences in mainstream children. GJTs should continue to be explored for clinical application as a potential tool for both assessment and intervention.

发展性语言障碍儿童和非发展性语言疾病儿童屈折形态的语法判断。
为了探索语法判断任务的临床潜力,本研究调查了屈折形态的语法判断任务(GJT)是否可以区分临床选择的DLD儿童样本和主流(即普通教育)学校的儿童。我们还探讨了语法性判断与接受性词汇、接受性语法和非单词重复测量之间的关系。DLD儿童(n = 30;年龄范围 = 69-80 月)和学龄前、一年级和二年级的主流儿童(n=89,年龄范围 = 61-96 months)是根据规则过去时、第三人称单数和所有格的GJT进行评估的。GJT对主流儿童和1年级和2年级的DLD差异儿童的发育差异很敏感,与对照组相比,DLD结果与表现延迟一年一致。GJT是临床选择的DLD儿童样本中成员资格最强的鉴别器(ROC曲线分析,曲线下面积 = 88%)。接受语法、接受词汇和非单词重复与GJT的表现有关。屈折形态的语法性判断表明,promise是DLD的可靠指标,也是对主流儿童发育差异敏感的指标。GJT作为评估和干预的潜在工具,应继续探索临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics encompasses the following: Linguistics and phonetics of disorders of speech and language; Contribution of data from communication disorders to theories of speech production and perception; Research on communication disorders in multilingual populations, and in under-researched populations, and languages other than English; Pragmatic aspects of speech and language disorders; Clinical dialectology and sociolinguistics; Childhood, adolescent and adult disorders of communication; Linguistics and phonetics of hearing impairment, sign language and lip-reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信