Does etodolac affect TRPA1 functionality in vivo in human?

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Heleen Marynissen, Delphine Mergaerts, Dorien Bamps, Jan de Hoon
{"title":"Does etodolac affect TRPA1 functionality <i>in vivo</i> in human?","authors":"Heleen Marynissen,&nbsp;Delphine Mergaerts,&nbsp;Dorien Bamps,&nbsp;Jan de Hoon","doi":"10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In preclinical research, etodolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, affected transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) activation. Yet, whether the <i>in vitro</i> interaction between etodolac and TRPA1 translates to altered TRPA1 functionality <i>in vivo</i> in human remains to be investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, double-blinded, celecoxib-controlled study was conducted to assess the effect of etodolac on TRPA1-mediated dermal blood flow (DBF) changes on the forearm of 15 healthy, male volunteers aged between 18 and 45 years. Over four study visits, separated by at least five days wash-out, a single or four-fold dose of etodolac 200 mg or celecoxib 200 mg was administered orally. Two hours post-dose, TRPA1 functionality was evaluated by assessing cinnamaldehyde-induced DBF changes. DBF changes were quantified and expressed in Perfusion Units (PUs) using laser Doppler imaging during 60 min post-cinnamaldehyde application. The corresponding area under the curve (AUC<sub>0-60min</sub>) was calculated as summary measure. Statistical analysis was performed using Linear mixed models with post-hoc Dunnett.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neither the single dose of etodolac nor celecoxib inhibited the cinnamaldehyde-induced DBF changes compared to no treatment (AUC<sub>0-60min</sub> ± SEM of 17,751 ± 1,514 PUs*min and 17,532 ± 1,706 PUs*min vs. 19,274 ± 1,031 PUs*min, respectively, both p=1.00). Similarly, also a four-fold dose of both compounds failed to inhibit the cinnamaldehyde-induced DBF changes (19,235 ± 1,260 PUs*min and 19,367 ± 1,085 PUs*min vs. 19,274 ± 1,031 PUs*min, respectively, both p=1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Etodolac did not affect the cinnamaldehyde-induced DBF changes, suggesting that it does not alter TRPA1 functionality <i>in vivo</i> in human.</p>","PeriodicalId":15352,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology","volume":"34 4","pages":"531-537"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In preclinical research, etodolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, affected transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) activation. Yet, whether the in vitro interaction between etodolac and TRPA1 translates to altered TRPA1 functionality in vivo in human remains to be investigated.

Methods: A randomized, double-blinded, celecoxib-controlled study was conducted to assess the effect of etodolac on TRPA1-mediated dermal blood flow (DBF) changes on the forearm of 15 healthy, male volunteers aged between 18 and 45 years. Over four study visits, separated by at least five days wash-out, a single or four-fold dose of etodolac 200 mg or celecoxib 200 mg was administered orally. Two hours post-dose, TRPA1 functionality was evaluated by assessing cinnamaldehyde-induced DBF changes. DBF changes were quantified and expressed in Perfusion Units (PUs) using laser Doppler imaging during 60 min post-cinnamaldehyde application. The corresponding area under the curve (AUC0-60min) was calculated as summary measure. Statistical analysis was performed using Linear mixed models with post-hoc Dunnett.

Results: Neither the single dose of etodolac nor celecoxib inhibited the cinnamaldehyde-induced DBF changes compared to no treatment (AUC0-60min ± SEM of 17,751 ± 1,514 PUs*min and 17,532 ± 1,706 PUs*min vs. 19,274 ± 1,031 PUs*min, respectively, both p=1.00). Similarly, also a four-fold dose of both compounds failed to inhibit the cinnamaldehyde-induced DBF changes (19,235 ± 1,260 PUs*min and 19,367 ± 1,085 PUs*min vs. 19,274 ± 1,031 PUs*min, respectively, both p=1.00).

Conclusions: Etodolac did not affect the cinnamaldehyde-induced DBF changes, suggesting that it does not alter TRPA1 functionality in vivo in human.

依托多拉酸是否影响人体内TRPA1的功能?
目的:在临床前研究中,非甾体抗炎药依托度酸影响瞬时受体电位锚蛋白1 (TRPA1)的激活。然而,依托多拉酸和TRPA1在体外的相互作用是否会导致体内TRPA1功能的改变还有待研究。方法:采用随机、双盲、塞来昔布对照研究,评估依托度酸对15名年龄在18 - 45岁的健康男性志愿者前臂trpa1介导的真皮血流量(DBF)变化的影响。在四次研究访问中,间隔至少五天的洗脱期,口服单次或四次剂量的依托多拉酸200mg或塞来昔布200mg。给药后2小时,通过评估肉桂醛诱导的DBF变化来评估TRPA1的功能。应用肉桂醛后60min,采用激光多普勒成像定量表达灌注单位(pu)的DBF变化。计算相应的曲线下面积(AUC0-60min)作为汇总测量。采用post-hoc Dunnett线性混合模型进行统计分析。结果:与未给药组相比,单剂量乙托酸和塞来昔布均未抑制肉桂醛诱导的DBF变化(AUC0-60min±SEM分别为17,751±1,514 PUs*min和17,532±1,706 PUs*min vs. 19,274±1,031 PUs*min, p=1.00)。同样,两种化合物的4倍剂量也未能抑制肉桂醛诱导的DBF变化(分别为19,235±1,260 PUs*min和19,367±1,085 PUs*min vs. 19,274±1,031 PUs*min, p=1.00)。结论:依托度酸不影响肉桂醛诱导的DBF变化,提示其不会改变人体内TRPA1的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology
Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology (JBCPP) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly published journal in experimental medicine. JBCPP publishes novel research in the physiological and pharmacological sciences, including brain research; cardiovascular-pulmonary interactions; exercise; thermal control; haematology; immune response; inflammation; metabolism; oxidative stress; and phytotherapy. As the borders between physiology, pharmacology and biochemistry become increasingly blurred, we also welcome papers using cutting-edge techniques in cellular and/or molecular biology to link descriptive or behavioral studies with cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the integrative processes. Topics: Behavior and Neuroprotection, Reproduction, Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity, Vascular Conditions, Cardiovascular Function, Cardiovascular-Pulmonary Interactions, Oxidative Stress, Metabolism, Immune Response, Hematological Profile, Inflammation, Infection, Phytotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信