PrEP-Related Interactive Toxicity Beliefs: Associations With Stigma, Substance Use, and PrEP Uptake.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Natalie M Brousseau, Redd Driver, Kay Simon, Ryan J Watson, Valerie A Earnshaw, Cristian J Chandler, Seth Kalichman, Lisa A Eaton
{"title":"PrEP-Related Interactive Toxicity Beliefs: Associations With Stigma, Substance Use, and PrEP Uptake.","authors":"Natalie M Brousseau,&nbsp;Redd Driver,&nbsp;Kay Simon,&nbsp;Ryan J Watson,&nbsp;Valerie A Earnshaw,&nbsp;Cristian J Chandler,&nbsp;Seth Kalichman,&nbsp;Lisa A Eaton","doi":"10.1521/aeap.2023.35.2.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite documented efficacy in reducing HIV transmission, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among Black sexual minority men (BSMM) is limited. One understudied factor which may impede PrEP uptake is PrEP-related interactive toxicity beliefs (i.e., believing it is hazardous to use alcohol/drugs while taking PrEP). Data from <i>N</i> = 169 HIV negative BSMM over 4 months showed high rates of agreement with at least one alcohol (78%) or drug (84%) interactive toxicity belief. Univariate analyses showed increased alcohol or drug interactive toxicity beliefs predicted lower PrEP uptake. Multivariable regression suggested those with PrEP-related alcohol or drug interactive toxicity beliefs were more likely to report high PrEP stigma, more negative PrEP beliefs (e.g., concern that taking PrEP disrupts life), and were more likely to use alcohol/drugs (respectively) prior to/during sex. Findings warrant intervention work targeting interactive toxicity beliefs with tailored messaging to mitigate PrEP stigma and correct concerns around substance use and PrEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":47801,"journal":{"name":"Aids Education and Prevention","volume":"35 2","pages":"114-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aids Education and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2023.35.2.114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite documented efficacy in reducing HIV transmission, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among Black sexual minority men (BSMM) is limited. One understudied factor which may impede PrEP uptake is PrEP-related interactive toxicity beliefs (i.e., believing it is hazardous to use alcohol/drugs while taking PrEP). Data from N = 169 HIV negative BSMM over 4 months showed high rates of agreement with at least one alcohol (78%) or drug (84%) interactive toxicity belief. Univariate analyses showed increased alcohol or drug interactive toxicity beliefs predicted lower PrEP uptake. Multivariable regression suggested those with PrEP-related alcohol or drug interactive toxicity beliefs were more likely to report high PrEP stigma, more negative PrEP beliefs (e.g., concern that taking PrEP disrupts life), and were more likely to use alcohol/drugs (respectively) prior to/during sex. Findings warrant intervention work targeting interactive toxicity beliefs with tailored messaging to mitigate PrEP stigma and correct concerns around substance use and PrEP.

PrEP相关的相互作用毒性信念:与病耻感、物质使用和PrEP摄取有关。
尽管在减少艾滋病毒传播方面有文献记载,但暴露前预防(PrEP)在黑人性少数男性(BSMM)中的吸收是有限的。可能阻碍PrEP吸收的一个未充分研究的因素是PrEP相关的相互作用毒性信念(即认为在服用PrEP时使用酒精/药物是危险的)。来自169例艾滋病毒阴性BSMM 4个月以上的数据显示,至少有一种酒精(78%)或药物(84%)相互作用毒性信念的一致性很高。单变量分析显示,酒精或药物相互作用毒性的增加预示着PrEP的摄入量会降低。多变量回归表明,那些相信与PrEP相关的酒精或药物相互作用毒性的人更有可能报告PrEP的高度耻辱,更消极的PrEP信念(例如,担心服用PrEP会扰乱生活),并且更有可能在性行为前/性行为中分别使用酒精/药物。研究结果支持针对相互作用毒性信念的干预工作,并提供量身定制的信息,以减轻PrEP的耻辱感,并纠正对物质使用和PrEP的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Presenting state-of-the-art research and information, AIDS Education and Prevention is a vital addition to the library collections of medical schools, hospitals, and other institutions and organizations with HIV/AIDS research programs. The journal integrates public health, psychosocial, sociocultural, and public policy perspectives on issues of key concern nationally and globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信