Heterogeneity analysis of the CEBPAdm AML based on bZIP region mutations.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Yan Hui, Shuxin Li, Junping Zhang, Bingcheng Liu, Yingchang Mi, Hui Wei, Jianxiang Wang
{"title":"Heterogeneity analysis of the <i>CEBPA</i>dm AML based on bZIP region mutations.","authors":"Yan Hui,&nbsp;Shuxin Li,&nbsp;Junping Zhang,&nbsp;Bingcheng Liu,&nbsp;Yingchang Mi,&nbsp;Hui Wei,&nbsp;Jianxiang Wang","doi":"10.1097/BS9.0000000000000153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with double-mutated <i>CEBPA</i> (<i>CEBPA</i>dm) AML were stratified into favorable risk group, however, few studies have investigated the heterogeneity of different <i>CEBPA</i>dm types in detail. In this study, we analyzed 2211 newly diagnosed AML and identified <i>CEBPA</i>dm in 10.8% of the patients. Within the <i>CEBPA</i>dm cohort, 225 of 239 patients (94.14%) presented with bZIP region mutations (<i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP) while 14 of 239 patients (5.86%) without bZIP region mutation (<i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP). Analysis of the accompanied molecular mutations showed statistically different incidences of GATA2 mutations between the <i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP group and the <i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP group (30.29% vs 0%). In the analysis of outcomes, patients with <i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) censored at hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during CR1 compared to those with <i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.132, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.229-7.979, <i>P</i> = .017). Refractory or relapsed AML (R/RAML) patients with <i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP were associated with shorter OS compared to those with <i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP (HR = 2.881, 95% CI = 1.021-8.131, <i>P</i> = .046). Taken together, AML with <i>CEBPA</i>dmbZIP and <i>CEBPA</i>dmnonbZIP showed different outcomes and might be regarded as distinctive AML entities.</p>","PeriodicalId":67343,"journal":{"name":"血液科学(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"血液科学(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BS9.0000000000000153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with double-mutated CEBPA (CEBPAdm) AML were stratified into favorable risk group, however, few studies have investigated the heterogeneity of different CEBPAdm types in detail. In this study, we analyzed 2211 newly diagnosed AML and identified CEBPAdm in 10.8% of the patients. Within the CEBPAdm cohort, 225 of 239 patients (94.14%) presented with bZIP region mutations (CEBPAdmbZIP) while 14 of 239 patients (5.86%) without bZIP region mutation (CEBPAdmnonbZIP). Analysis of the accompanied molecular mutations showed statistically different incidences of GATA2 mutations between the CEBPAdmbZIP group and the CEBPAdmnonbZIP group (30.29% vs 0%). In the analysis of outcomes, patients with CEBPAdmnonbZIP were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) censored at hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during CR1 compared to those with CEBPAdmbZIP (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.132, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.229-7.979, P = .017). Refractory or relapsed AML (R/RAML) patients with CEBPAdmnonbZIP were associated with shorter OS compared to those with CEBPAdmbZIP (HR = 2.881, 95% CI = 1.021-8.131, P = .046). Taken together, AML with CEBPAdmbZIP and CEBPAdmnonbZIP showed different outcomes and might be regarded as distinctive AML entities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于bZIP区域突变的CEBPAdm AML异质性分析。
双突变CEBPA (CEBPAdm) AML患者被划分为有利风险组,但很少有研究详细探讨不同类型CEBPAdm的异质性。在这项研究中,我们分析了2211例新诊断的AML,在10.8%的患者中发现了CEBPAdm。在CEBPAdm队列中,239例患者中有225例(94.14%)出现bZIP区域突变(CEBPAdmbZIP), 239例患者中有14例(5.86%)未出现bZIP区域突变(CEBPAdmnonbZIP)。伴随分子突变分析显示,CEBPAdmbZIP组和CEBPAdmnonbZIP组的GATA2突变发生率有统计学差异(30.29% vs 0%)。在结果分析中,与CEBPAdmbZIP患者相比,CEBPAdmnonbZIP患者在CR1期间造血干细胞移植(HSCT)中总生存期(OS)更短(风险比(HR) = 3.132, 95%可信区间(CI) = 1.229-7.979, P = 0.017)。与患有CEBPAdmnonbZIP的患者相比,患有CEBPAdmbZIP的难治性或复发性AML (R/RAML)患者的生存期较短(HR = 2.881, 95% CI = 1.021-8.131, P = 0.046)。合并CEBPAdmbZIP和CEBPAdmnonbZIP的AML表现出不同的结果,可能被视为不同的AML实体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信