Motives of Online Hate Speech: Results from a Quota Sample Online Survey.

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
M Rohangis Mohseni
{"title":"Motives of Online Hate Speech: Results from a Quota Sample Online Survey.","authors":"M Rohangis Mohseni","doi":"10.1089/cyber.2022.0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Online hate speech (OHS) is a prevalent societal problem, but most studies investigating the reasons and causes of OHS focus on the perpetrators' side while ignoring the bystanders' and the victims' side. This is also true for the underlying theories. Therefore, we proposed a new Action-Theoretical Model of Online Hate Speech (ATMOHS), which assumes that OHS is a product of environmental, situational, and personal variables with three groups involved (perpetrators, bystanders, and victims) that each have their own set of motives, attitudes, traits, and norm beliefs that are impacting their behavior. The model was put to a first test with an online survey using a quota sample of the German online population (<i>N</i> = 1,791). The study at hand is a first analysis of these data that focus on the motives of OHS. Results show that wanting to be a role model for others is an important motive on the active bystanders' side. However, it could not be confirmed that any aggression motive is important on the perpetrators' side or that undeservingness is an important motive on the victims' side. Future studies could investigate if there are other motives for the victims' side that are in-line with the underlying theory of learned helplessness, or if there is a better theory for modeling the victims' side. Future studies could also develop a better scale for aggression motives. In practice, prevention programs could focus on being a role model for others as a relevant motive for becoming an active bystander.</p>","PeriodicalId":10872,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","volume":"26 7","pages":"499-506"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online hate speech (OHS) is a prevalent societal problem, but most studies investigating the reasons and causes of OHS focus on the perpetrators' side while ignoring the bystanders' and the victims' side. This is also true for the underlying theories. Therefore, we proposed a new Action-Theoretical Model of Online Hate Speech (ATMOHS), which assumes that OHS is a product of environmental, situational, and personal variables with three groups involved (perpetrators, bystanders, and victims) that each have their own set of motives, attitudes, traits, and norm beliefs that are impacting their behavior. The model was put to a first test with an online survey using a quota sample of the German online population (N = 1,791). The study at hand is a first analysis of these data that focus on the motives of OHS. Results show that wanting to be a role model for others is an important motive on the active bystanders' side. However, it could not be confirmed that any aggression motive is important on the perpetrators' side or that undeservingness is an important motive on the victims' side. Future studies could investigate if there are other motives for the victims' side that are in-line with the underlying theory of learned helplessness, or if there is a better theory for modeling the victims' side. Future studies could also develop a better scale for aggression motives. In practice, prevention programs could focus on being a role model for others as a relevant motive for becoming an active bystander.

网络仇恨言论的动机:来自定额抽样在线调查的结果。
网络仇恨言论(OHS)是一个普遍存在的社会问题,但大多数调查OHS原因和原因的研究都侧重于肇事者方面,而忽视了旁观者和受害者方面。基础理论也是如此。因此,我们提出了一个新的网络仇恨言论的行动理论模型(ATMOHS),该模型假设网络仇恨言论是环境、情境和个人变量的产物,涉及三个群体(肇事者、旁观者和受害者),每个群体都有自己的一套动机、态度、特征和规范信念,这些因素影响着他们的行为。该模型通过使用德国在线人口配额样本(N = 1,791)的在线调查进行了第一次测试。手头的研究是对这些关注职业健康安全动机的数据的首次分析。结果表明,想要成为他人的榜样是积极旁观者的一个重要动机。但是,不能证实任何侵略动机对犯罪者一方是重要的,或者不正当是受害者一方的重要动机。未来的研究可以调查是否有其他动机与习得性无助的潜在理论一致,或者是否有更好的理论来模拟受害者的一面。未来的研究还可以开发出更好的攻击动机量表。在实践中,预防项目可以把重点放在成为他人的榜样上,作为成为积极旁观者的相关动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking is a leading peer-reviewed journal that is recognized for its authoritative research on the social, behavioral, and psychological impacts of contemporary social networking practices. The journal covers a wide range of platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, internet gaming, and e-commerce, and examines how these digital environments shape human interaction and societal norms. For over two decades, this journal has been a pioneering voice in the exploration of social networking and virtual reality, establishing itself as an indispensable resource for professionals and academics in the field. It is particularly celebrated for its swift dissemination of findings through rapid communication articles, alongside comprehensive, in-depth studies that delve into the multifaceted effects of interactive technologies on both individual behavior and broader societal trends. The journal's scope encompasses the full spectrum of impacts—highlighting not only the potential benefits but also the challenges that arise as a result of these technologies. By providing a platform for rigorous research and critical discussions, it fosters a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between technology and human behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信