Extended Wireless pH Monitoring Significantly Increases Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Diagnoses in Patients With a Normal pH Impedance Study.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Sebastian S Zeki, Ismail Miah, Pierfrancesco Visaggi, Anna Wolak, Minerva deSilva, Jason M Dunn, Andrew Davies, James Gossage, Abrie Botha, Guiping Sui, Jafar Jafari, Terry Wong
{"title":"Extended Wireless pH Monitoring Significantly Increases Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Diagnoses in Patients With a Normal pH Impedance Study.","authors":"Sebastian S Zeki,&nbsp;Ismail Miah,&nbsp;Pierfrancesco Visaggi,&nbsp;Anna Wolak,&nbsp;Minerva deSilva,&nbsp;Jason M Dunn,&nbsp;Andrew Davies,&nbsp;James Gossage,&nbsp;Abrie Botha,&nbsp;Guiping Sui,&nbsp;Jafar Jafari,&nbsp;Terry Wong","doi":"10.5056/jnm22130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Extended wireless pH monitoring (WPM) is used to investigate gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as subsequent or alternative investigation to 24-hour catheter-based studies. However, false negative catheter studies may occur in patients with intermittent reflux or due to catheter-induced discomfort or altered behavior. We aim to investigate the diagnostic yield of WPM after a negative 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII-pH) monitoring study and to determine predictors of GERD on WPM given a negative MII-pH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive adult patients (> 18 years) who underwent WPM for further investigation of suspected GERD following a negative 24-hour MII-pH and upper endoscopy between January 2010 and December 2019 were retrospectively included. Clinical data, endoscopy, MII-pH, and WPM results were retrieved. Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, or Student's t test were used to compare data. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate predictors of positive WMP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eighty-one consecutive patients underwent WPM following a negative MII-pH study. On average and worst day analysis, 33.7% (61/181) and 34.2% (62/181) of the patients negative for GERD on MII-pH were given a diagnosis of GERD following WPM, respectively. On a stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis, the basal respiratory minimum pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter was a significant predictor of GERD with OR = 0.95 (0.90-1.00, <i>P</i> = 0.041).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>WPM increases GERD diagnostic yield in patients with a negative MII-pH selected for further testing based on clinical suspicion. Further studies are needed to assess the role of WPM as a first line investigation in patients with GERD symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/16/jnm-29-3-335.PMC10334198.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm22130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Extended wireless pH monitoring (WPM) is used to investigate gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as subsequent or alternative investigation to 24-hour catheter-based studies. However, false negative catheter studies may occur in patients with intermittent reflux or due to catheter-induced discomfort or altered behavior. We aim to investigate the diagnostic yield of WPM after a negative 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII-pH) monitoring study and to determine predictors of GERD on WPM given a negative MII-pH.

Methods: Consecutive adult patients (> 18 years) who underwent WPM for further investigation of suspected GERD following a negative 24-hour MII-pH and upper endoscopy between January 2010 and December 2019 were retrospectively included. Clinical data, endoscopy, MII-pH, and WPM results were retrieved. Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, or Student's t test were used to compare data. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate predictors of positive WMP.

Results: One hundred and eighty-one consecutive patients underwent WPM following a negative MII-pH study. On average and worst day analysis, 33.7% (61/181) and 34.2% (62/181) of the patients negative for GERD on MII-pH were given a diagnosis of GERD following WPM, respectively. On a stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis, the basal respiratory minimum pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter was a significant predictor of GERD with OR = 0.95 (0.90-1.00, P = 0.041).

Conclusions: WPM increases GERD diagnostic yield in patients with a negative MII-pH selected for further testing based on clinical suspicion. Further studies are needed to assess the role of WPM as a first line investigation in patients with GERD symptoms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

扩展无线pH监测显著增加正常pH阻抗研究患者胃食管反流病的诊断。
背景/目的:扩展无线pH监测(WPM)用于调查胃食管反流病(GERD),作为24小时导管研究的后续或替代调查。然而,导管假阴性研究可能发生在间歇性反流或由于导管引起的不适或行为改变的患者。我们的目的是在24小时阴性多通道腔内阻抗pH (MII-pH)监测研究后研究WPM的诊断率,并确定MII-pH为阴性的WPM的GERD预测因素。方法:回顾性纳入2010年1月至2019年12月期间连续接受WPM以进一步调查疑似胃食管反流的24小时MII-pH阴性和上腹内窥镜检查的成年患者(> 18岁)。检索临床资料、内窥镜检查、MII-pH和WPM结果。使用Fisher精确检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验或Student t检验来比较数据。采用Logistic回归分析探讨WMP阳性的预测因素。结果:181例连续患者在MII-pH阴性后接受了WPM。在平均日和最坏日分析中,分别有33.7%(61/181)和34.2%(62/181)的MII-pH阴性患者在WPM后被诊断为GERD。在逐步多元logistic回归分析中,食管下括约肌基础呼吸最低压力是GERD的显著预测因子,OR = 0.95 (0.90-1.00, P = 0.041)。结论:在MII-pH为阴性的患者中,WPM增加了基于临床怀疑进行进一步检测的GERD诊断率。需要进一步的研究来评估WPM作为反流胃食管反流症状患者的一线调查的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信