Predictors of psychotherapy dropout in patients with borderline personality disorder: A systematic review

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Leonor de Freixo Ferreira, Cátia Guerra, M. A. Vieira-Coelho
{"title":"Predictors of psychotherapy dropout in patients with borderline personality disorder: A systematic review","authors":"Leonor de Freixo Ferreira,&nbsp;Cátia Guerra,&nbsp;M. A. Vieira-Coelho","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a highly debilitating psychiatric condition. Despite the expansion of new BPD specific forms of psychotherapy in the last few decades, high dropout rates have been reported in these treatments. Treatment discontinuation is associated with poor patient outcomes, inefficient resource utilization and the demoralization of healthcare providers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In order to identify predictors of psychotherapy dropout among patients with BPD, a systematic search of Medline, the Cochrane Library, PsycInfo and PsycArticles was conducted. Studies included were randomized-controlled trials in which patients diagnosed with BPD were exposed to a therapeutic intervention consisted of an evidence-based psychotherapy. The quality of evidence in the studies was assessed through the use of revised Cochrane risk of bias tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Six articles, incorporating four types of psychotherapy programmes, were included. Overall, the studies present low risk of attrition and reporting bias and unclear risk of selection, performance and detection bias. Patients with weaker therapeutic alliance scores and higher hostility presented with higher dropout rates. In contrast, better mindfulness skills and greater performance in specific neuropsychological domains, such as memory and executive control, were identified as predictive of lower risk of dropout. Sociodemographic variables and treatment history did not influence treatment retention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Factors that influence discontinuation should be taken into consideration in future treatment programmes, in an effort to optimize retention. Qualitative assessments of patients' reasons for dropping out may also help guide adjustments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"30 6","pages":"1324-1337"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2888","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a highly debilitating psychiatric condition. Despite the expansion of new BPD specific forms of psychotherapy in the last few decades, high dropout rates have been reported in these treatments. Treatment discontinuation is associated with poor patient outcomes, inefficient resource utilization and the demoralization of healthcare providers.

Methods

In order to identify predictors of psychotherapy dropout among patients with BPD, a systematic search of Medline, the Cochrane Library, PsycInfo and PsycArticles was conducted. Studies included were randomized-controlled trials in which patients diagnosed with BPD were exposed to a therapeutic intervention consisted of an evidence-based psychotherapy. The quality of evidence in the studies was assessed through the use of revised Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Results

Six articles, incorporating four types of psychotherapy programmes, were included. Overall, the studies present low risk of attrition and reporting bias and unclear risk of selection, performance and detection bias. Patients with weaker therapeutic alliance scores and higher hostility presented with higher dropout rates. In contrast, better mindfulness skills and greater performance in specific neuropsychological domains, such as memory and executive control, were identified as predictive of lower risk of dropout. Sociodemographic variables and treatment history did not influence treatment retention.

Conclusions

Factors that influence discontinuation should be taken into consideration in future treatment programmes, in an effort to optimize retention. Qualitative assessments of patients' reasons for dropping out may also help guide adjustments.

边缘型人格障碍患者放弃心理治疗的预测因素:系统回顾
简介边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是一种极易使人崩溃的精神疾病。尽管在过去几十年中,针对边缘型人格障碍的新型心理疗法不断涌现,但据报道,这些疗法的辍学率很高。治疗中断与患者疗效不佳、资源利用效率低下以及医护人员士气低落有关:为了确定 BPD 患者放弃心理治疗的预测因素,我们对 Medline、Cochrane 图书馆、PsycInfo 和 PsycArticles 进行了系统检索。纳入的研究均为随机对照试验,在这些试验中,被诊断为 BPD 的患者接受了由循证心理疗法组成的治疗干预。研究的证据质量通过使用修订版 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行评估:共纳入六篇文章,包括四种类型的心理治疗方案。总体而言,这些研究的自然减员和报告偏倚风险较低,而选择、表现和检测偏倚风险不高。治疗联盟得分较低、敌意较强的患者辍学率较高。相比之下,正念技能更强、在特定神经心理学领域(如记忆和执行控制)表现更好的患者,其辍学风险更低。社会人口学变量和治疗史并不影响治疗的持续性:结论:在未来的治疗计划中,应考虑到影响中断治疗的因素,以优化治疗的持续性。对患者退出治疗的原因进行定性评估也有助于指导治疗方案的调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信