Pathologist-Verified Billing: Correction Rates of Miscoded Frozen Section Cases.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
John Hedgepeth, Cara Randall, Tracie Massey, Christine Bookhout
{"title":"Pathologist-Verified Billing: Correction Rates of Miscoded Frozen Section Cases.","authors":"John Hedgepeth,&nbsp;Cara Randall,&nbsp;Tracie Massey,&nbsp;Christine Bookhout","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0158-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>With the adoption of Epic/Beaker at our institution, surgical pathology specimens are assigned a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) charge code at the time of accessioning, and pathologists have been made responsible for verifying the accuracy of the code before signing out the case.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To determine with what frequency attending pathologists reassigned the correct charge code to a specimen when the code assigned at accessioning was incorrect, as well as to estimate the potential financial impact of missed changes.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>We reviewed all specimens received for frozen section during a 7-month period, identified specimens where the default charge code that our departmental protocol assigns at frozen section (88305) was incorrect, and assessed the rate of successful code change by pathologists and the potential financial cost of each missed change.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Three hundred fifty-two of 2191 frozen section specimens (16%) required a change in the 88305 charge code. The codes for 195 specimens (55%) were correctly changed by the attending pathologist, while 157 (45%) were not changed (149) or were changed to an incorrect charge code (8). Individual pathologist change rates ranged from 0% to 100%, with a mean and median change rate of 43% and 24%, respectively. Using average code reimbursements at our institution, the loss in revenue from the 157 missed and incorrect frozen section changes was estimated at $13 788 ($1970 per month).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Pathologists showed highly variable rates of correcting CPT charge codes when the incorrect code had been previously assigned to a case, with associated loss of revenue from missed and incorrect code changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":"147 8","pages":"969-973"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2022-0158-OA","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: With the adoption of Epic/Beaker at our institution, surgical pathology specimens are assigned a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) charge code at the time of accessioning, and pathologists have been made responsible for verifying the accuracy of the code before signing out the case.

Objective.—: To determine with what frequency attending pathologists reassigned the correct charge code to a specimen when the code assigned at accessioning was incorrect, as well as to estimate the potential financial impact of missed changes.

Design.—: We reviewed all specimens received for frozen section during a 7-month period, identified specimens where the default charge code that our departmental protocol assigns at frozen section (88305) was incorrect, and assessed the rate of successful code change by pathologists and the potential financial cost of each missed change.

Results.—: Three hundred fifty-two of 2191 frozen section specimens (16%) required a change in the 88305 charge code. The codes for 195 specimens (55%) were correctly changed by the attending pathologist, while 157 (45%) were not changed (149) or were changed to an incorrect charge code (8). Individual pathologist change rates ranged from 0% to 100%, with a mean and median change rate of 43% and 24%, respectively. Using average code reimbursements at our institution, the loss in revenue from the 157 missed and incorrect frozen section changes was estimated at $13 788 ($1970 per month).

Conclusions.—: Pathologists showed highly variable rates of correcting CPT charge codes when the incorrect code had been previously assigned to a case, with associated loss of revenue from missed and incorrect code changes.

病理验证计费:错误编码冷冻切片病例的纠正率。
上下文。-:我院采用Epic/Beaker,手术病理标本在入院时被分配一个现行程序术语(CPT)收费代码,病理医师在签出病例前负责验证代码的准确性。-:确定当入院时分配的代码不正确时,主治病理学家以何种频率将正确的收费代码重新分配给标本,并估计错过更改的潜在财务影响。-:我们审查了7个月期间收到的所有冷冻切片标本,确定了我们部门协议在冷冻切片(88305)指定的默认收费代码不正确的标本,并评估了病理学家成功更改代码的比率以及每次错过更改的潜在财务成本。-: 2191个冷冻切片标本中有352个(16%)需要更改88305收费代码。195例(55%)标本代码被主治病理医师正确更改,157例(45%)标本代码未被更改(149例)或更改为不正确的收费代码(8例)。个体病理医师的变化率从0%到100%不等,平均变化率为43%,中位数变化率为24%。使用我们机构的平均代码报销,157个遗漏和不正确的冻结切片更改造成的收入损失估计为13788美元(每月1970美元)。-:当先前分配给一个病例的错误代码时,病理学家显示出高度可变的CPT收费代码更正率,并且由于遗漏和错误的代码更改而导致相关的收入损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (APLM). This monthly, peer-reviewed journal of the College of American Pathologists offers global reach and highest measured readership among pathology journals. Published since 1926, ARCHIVES was voted in 2009 the only pathology journal among the top 100 most influential journals of the past 100 years by the BioMedical and Life Sciences Division of the Special Libraries Association. Online access to the full-text and PDF files of APLM articles is free.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信