The Role of Postoperative Nasal Stents in Cleft Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1177/10556656231190703
David C Nguyen, Janine A Myint, Alexander Y Lin
{"title":"The Role of Postoperative Nasal Stents in Cleft Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review.","authors":"David C Nguyen, Janine A Myint, Alexander Y Lin","doi":"10.1177/10556656231190703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the role of postoperative nasal stenting in preserving nasal shape and preventing nostril stenosis in cleft rhinoplasty, and to develop a classification system for postoperative nasal stents.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic and manual searches of scientific literature were conducted from 3 databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, OVID). Primary evidence that described postoperative nasal stenting in cleft rhinoplasty were included. Exclusion criteria included secondary evidence, non-English articles, and studies focusing on preoperative nasal stents.</p><p><strong>Patients and participants: </strong>Patients with cleft lip/nose of any type were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Role in preservation of nasal shape & symmetry, role in prevention of nostril stenosis, complications with the use of postoperative nasal stent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 13 articles, 9 papers described the preservation of nasal shape with nasal stents and three studies with a control group showed improved symmetry score. No studies evaluated the prevention of nostril stenosis; however, 2 studies reported improvement of nostril stenosis in secondary cleft rhinoplasty. The results of the included studies had significant heterogeneity. Nasal stents were classified into five types: Type I-spare parts assembled, Type II-prefabricated commercial, Type IIIa-patient specific 3D-printed static, Type IIIb-patient specific dynamic, and Type IV-internal absorbable. Total complications were 6.0%, including irritation (0.9%), infection (0.3%), and stent loss (4.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the lack of consensus with postoperative nasal stents, this review suggests its safety and role in preserving shape and improving stenosis. Our classification system highlights variability and the need for better quality studies to determine the efficacy of nasal stents.</p>","PeriodicalId":55255,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231190703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the role of postoperative nasal stenting in preserving nasal shape and preventing nostril stenosis in cleft rhinoplasty, and to develop a classification system for postoperative nasal stents.

Design: Systematic review.

Methods: Electronic and manual searches of scientific literature were conducted from 3 databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, OVID). Primary evidence that described postoperative nasal stenting in cleft rhinoplasty were included. Exclusion criteria included secondary evidence, non-English articles, and studies focusing on preoperative nasal stents.

Patients and participants: Patients with cleft lip/nose of any type were included.

Main outcome measure(s): Role in preservation of nasal shape & symmetry, role in prevention of nostril stenosis, complications with the use of postoperative nasal stent.

Results: Of the 13 articles, 9 papers described the preservation of nasal shape with nasal stents and three studies with a control group showed improved symmetry score. No studies evaluated the prevention of nostril stenosis; however, 2 studies reported improvement of nostril stenosis in secondary cleft rhinoplasty. The results of the included studies had significant heterogeneity. Nasal stents were classified into five types: Type I-spare parts assembled, Type II-prefabricated commercial, Type IIIa-patient specific 3D-printed static, Type IIIb-patient specific dynamic, and Type IV-internal absorbable. Total complications were 6.0%, including irritation (0.9%), infection (0.3%), and stent loss (4.6%).

Conclusion: Despite the lack of consensus with postoperative nasal stents, this review suggests its safety and role in preserving shape and improving stenosis. Our classification system highlights variability and the need for better quality studies to determine the efficacy of nasal stents.

鼻裂整形术后鼻支架的作用:系统回顾
目的评估术后鼻支架在鼻裂整形术中保留鼻形和预防鼻孔狭窄的作用,并制定术后鼻支架的分类系统:设计:系统综述:方法:从 3 个数据库(PubMed、SCOPUS 和 OVID)中对科学文献进行电子和人工检索。纳入了描述鼻裂整形术后鼻支架植入的主要证据。排除标准包括次级证据、非英语文章以及侧重于术前鼻腔支架的研究:患者和参与者:包括任何类型的唇裂/鼻裂患者:主要结果测量指标:在保持鼻形和对称性方面的作用、在预防鼻孔狭窄方面的作用、术后使用鼻支架的并发症:结果:在 13 篇文章中,有 9 篇描述了使用鼻支架保留鼻形的情况,有 3 项研究的对照组显示对称性评分有所提高。没有研究评估了鼻孔狭窄的预防情况;但有 2 项研究报告称,二次鼻裂整形术后鼻孔狭窄的情况有所改善。纳入研究的结果具有显著的异质性。鼻孔支架分为五种类型:I 型--组装的备用零件;II 型--预制的商用零件;IIIa 型--患者专用的 3D 打印静态零件;IIIb 型--患者专用的动态零件;IV 型--内部可吸收零件。总并发症发生率为 6.0%,包括刺激(0.9%)、感染(0.3%)和支架脱落(4.6%):尽管对术后鼻腔支架缺乏共识,但本综述表明其安全性以及在保持形状和改善狭窄方面的作用。我们的分类系统突显了鼻腔支架的可变性,以及需要更高质量的研究来确定其疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
36.40%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信