Survival Differences in High-Risk Prostate Cancer by Age.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clara García Fuentes, Ana Guijarro, Virginia Hernández, Álvaro Gonzalo, Estíbaliz Jiménez, Enrique De la Peña, Elia Pérez, Elia Pérez, Carlos Llorente
{"title":"Survival Differences in High-Risk Prostate Cancer by Age.","authors":"Clara García Fuentes,&nbsp;Ana Guijarro,&nbsp;Virginia Hernández,&nbsp;Álvaro Gonzalo,&nbsp;Estíbaliz Jiménez,&nbsp;Enrique De la Peña,&nbsp;Elia Pérez,&nbsp;Elia Pérez,&nbsp;Carlos Llorente","doi":"10.22037/uj.v20i.7393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Age is an established determining factor in survival in low-risk prostate cancer (PC), being this evidence weaker in high-risk tumors. Our aim is to evaluate the survival of patients with high-risk PC treated with curative intent and to identify differences across ages at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a retrospective analysis of patients with high-risk PC treated with surgery (RP) or radiotherapy (RDT) excluding N+ patients. We divided patients by age groups: < 60, 60-70, and > 70 years. We performed a comparative survival analysis. A multivariate analysis adjusted for clinically relevant variables and initial treatment received was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 2383 patients, 378 met the selection criteria with a median follow-up of 8.9 years: 38 (10.1%) < 60 years, 175 (46.3%) between 60-70 years, and 165 (43.6%) >70 years. Initial treatment with surgery was predominant in the younger group (RP:63.2%, RDT:36.8%), and with radiotherapy in the older group (RP:17%, RDT:83%) (p = 0.001). In the survival analysis, significant differences were observed in overall survival, with better results for the younger group. However, these results were reversed in biochemical recurrence-free survival, with patients < 60 years presenting a higher rate of biochemical recurrence at 10 years. In the multivariate analysis, age behaved as an independent risk variable only for overall survival, with a HR of 2.8 in the group >70 years (95%CI: 1.22-6.5; p = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our series, age appeared to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, with no differences in the rest of the survival rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.7393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Age is an established determining factor in survival in low-risk prostate cancer (PC), being this evidence weaker in high-risk tumors. Our aim is to evaluate the survival of patients with high-risk PC treated with curative intent and to identify differences across ages at diagnosis.

Methods: We did a retrospective analysis of patients with high-risk PC treated with surgery (RP) or radiotherapy (RDT) excluding N+ patients. We divided patients by age groups: < 60, 60-70, and > 70 years. We performed a comparative survival analysis. A multivariate analysis adjusted for clinically relevant variables and initial treatment received was performed.

Results: Of a total of 2383 patients, 378 met the selection criteria with a median follow-up of 8.9 years: 38 (10.1%) < 60 years, 175 (46.3%) between 60-70 years, and 165 (43.6%) >70 years. Initial treatment with surgery was predominant in the younger group (RP:63.2%, RDT:36.8%), and with radiotherapy in the older group (RP:17%, RDT:83%) (p = 0.001). In the survival analysis, significant differences were observed in overall survival, with better results for the younger group. However, these results were reversed in biochemical recurrence-free survival, with patients < 60 years presenting a higher rate of biochemical recurrence at 10 years. In the multivariate analysis, age behaved as an independent risk variable only for overall survival, with a HR of 2.8 in the group >70 years (95%CI: 1.22-6.5; p = 0.015).

Conclusion: In our series, age appeared to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, with no differences in the rest of the survival rates.

高危前列腺癌不同年龄的生存差异。
目的:年龄是低危前列腺癌(PC)患者生存的一个确定因素,但在高危肿瘤中这一证据较弱。我们的目的是评估以治疗为目的的高风险PC患者的生存率,并确定诊断时不同年龄的差异。方法:回顾性分析除N+患者外,接受手术或放疗治疗的高危PC患者。我们将患者按年龄分组:< 60岁、60-70岁和> 70岁。我们进行了比较生存分析。对临床相关变量和接受的初始治疗进行调整后的多变量分析。结果:2383例患者中,378例符合入选标准,中位随访8.9年:< 60岁38例(10.1%),60-70岁175例(46.3%),>70岁165例(43.6%)。年轻组以手术为主(RP:63.2%, RDT:36.8%),老年组以放疗为主(RP:17%, RDT:83%) (p = 0.001)。在生存分析中,观察到总生存率的显著差异,年轻组的结果更好。然而,这些结果在生化无复发生存率中被逆转,< 60岁的患者在10年的生化复发率更高。在多变量分析中,年龄仅作为总生存的独立危险变量,>70岁组的HR为2.8 (95%CI: 1.22-6.5;P = 0.015)。结论:在我们的研究中,年龄似乎是总体生存率的独立预后因素,其余生存率没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Journal
Urology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist. Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信