André Rebelo, João R Pereira, Diogo V Martinho, João Valente-Dos-Santos
{"title":"Rating of Perceived Exertion in Professional Volleyball: A Systematic Review.","authors":"André Rebelo, João R Pereira, Diogo V Martinho, João Valente-Dos-Santos","doi":"10.5114/jhk/161614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is a non-invasive, cost effective, and time efficient strategy to measure training loads. However, data can be collected without following specific procedures and across a range of methods (e.g., different RPE scales and/or different operational questions). Consequently, practitioners working in professional volleyball can use this information in various ways with different assessment standards between them. Therefore, the purpose of the current review was to systematically and critically evaluate the use of RPE-based methods in professional volleyball athletes. Electronic searches were conducted in four databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and Web of Science). The electronic search yielded 442 articles, from which 14 articles were included in the systematic review. All included studies used the BORG-CR10 scale to calculate the session RPE. The main findings indicate that, to minimize the effect of the last exercise of the session, the athlete should be presented with the RPE question 10 to 30 minutes after the session is finished. Additionally, in order to evaluate the intensity of the training session, the question should be \"how hard/intense was your session?\", avoiding questions without these adverbs or adjectives such as \"how was your training session/workout?\". Future studies should analyse the collection of the localized RPE responses in professional volleyball athletes and their relationships with objective markers such as the number of jumps and accelerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16055,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Kinetics","volume":"87 ","pages":"143-155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Kinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/161614","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is a non-invasive, cost effective, and time efficient strategy to measure training loads. However, data can be collected without following specific procedures and across a range of methods (e.g., different RPE scales and/or different operational questions). Consequently, practitioners working in professional volleyball can use this information in various ways with different assessment standards between them. Therefore, the purpose of the current review was to systematically and critically evaluate the use of RPE-based methods in professional volleyball athletes. Electronic searches were conducted in four databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and Web of Science). The electronic search yielded 442 articles, from which 14 articles were included in the systematic review. All included studies used the BORG-CR10 scale to calculate the session RPE. The main findings indicate that, to minimize the effect of the last exercise of the session, the athlete should be presented with the RPE question 10 to 30 minutes after the session is finished. Additionally, in order to evaluate the intensity of the training session, the question should be "how hard/intense was your session?", avoiding questions without these adverbs or adjectives such as "how was your training session/workout?". Future studies should analyse the collection of the localized RPE responses in professional volleyball athletes and their relationships with objective markers such as the number of jumps and accelerations.
感知负荷评分(RPE)是一种非侵入性、成本效益和时间效率的训练负荷测量策略。然而,数据的收集可以不遵循特定的程序,并通过一系列方法(例如,不同的RPE量表和/或不同的操作问题)。因此,在职业排球运动中工作的练习者可以以不同的方式使用这些信息,他们之间的评估标准不同。因此,本综述的目的是系统和批判性地评估在职业排球运动员中使用基于rpe的方法。电子检索在四个数据库(PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Scopus和Web of Science)中进行。电子检索结果为442篇,其中14篇纳入系统综述。所有纳入的研究均使用BORG-CR10量表来计算会话RPE。主要研究结果表明,为了尽量减少最后一次训练的影响,运动员应该在训练结束后10到30分钟接受RPE测试。此外,为了评估训练的强度,问题应该是“你的训练有多困难/强度?”,避免没有副词或形容词的问题,比如“你的训练/锻炼怎么样?”。未来的研究应该分析职业排球运动员局部RPE反应的收集,以及它们与跳跃次数和加速度等客观指标的关系。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Human Kinetics is an open access interdisciplinary periodical offering the latest research in the science of human movement studies. This comprehensive professional journal features articles and research notes encompassing such topic areas as: Kinesiology, Exercise Physiology and Nutrition, Sports Training and Behavioural Sciences in Sport, but especially considering elite and competitive aspects of sport.
The journal publishes original papers, invited reviews, short communications and letters to the Editors. Manuscripts submitted to the journal must contain novel data on theoretical or experimental research or on practical applications in the field of sport sciences.
The Journal of Human Kinetics is published in March, June, September and December.
We encourage scientists from around the world to submit their papers to our periodical.