Examining the feasibility of a youth advocacy program promoting healthy snacking in New York City: a mixed-methods process evaluation.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Navika Gangrade, Nisha Botchwey, Tashara M Leak
{"title":"Examining the feasibility of a youth advocacy program promoting healthy snacking in New York City: a mixed-methods process evaluation.","authors":"Navika Gangrade,&nbsp;Nisha Botchwey,&nbsp;Tashara M Leak","doi":"10.1093/her/cyad019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adolescents from urban communities are at risk for unhealthy snacking behaviors. Youth advocacy interventions are shown to improve certain adolescent health behaviors, such as substance use. However, it remains unclear if youth advocacy is a feasible method to promote healthy snacking. As such, the aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of a youth advocacy program promoting healthy snacking among adolescents in New York City by conducting a mixed-methods process evaluation. Adolescents (12-18 years) at a Boys and Girls Club in New York City were recruited to participate in a 12-session adaptation of the Youth Engagement and Action for Health! program to advocate for the promotion of healthy snacks in corner stores. A mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted to assess recruitment, reach (attendance), dose delivered (amount of intervention delivered), fidelity (degree to which intervention was implemented according to curriculum) and dose received (participant engagement/satisfaction). Satisfaction was also evaluated through focus groups. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative data, and focus groups were analyzed using thematic analysis. Participant retention (94.74%), attendance (93.52%), dose delivered (98.94%), fidelity (98.5%), engagement (4.97/5) and program satisfaction (4/5) were high. Focus groups (n = 6; 28 participants) revealed that participants learned about nutrition, enjoyed being advocates and improved snacking behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48236,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Research","volume":"38 4","pages":"306-319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyad019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adolescents from urban communities are at risk for unhealthy snacking behaviors. Youth advocacy interventions are shown to improve certain adolescent health behaviors, such as substance use. However, it remains unclear if youth advocacy is a feasible method to promote healthy snacking. As such, the aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of a youth advocacy program promoting healthy snacking among adolescents in New York City by conducting a mixed-methods process evaluation. Adolescents (12-18 years) at a Boys and Girls Club in New York City were recruited to participate in a 12-session adaptation of the Youth Engagement and Action for Health! program to advocate for the promotion of healthy snacks in corner stores. A mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted to assess recruitment, reach (attendance), dose delivered (amount of intervention delivered), fidelity (degree to which intervention was implemented according to curriculum) and dose received (participant engagement/satisfaction). Satisfaction was also evaluated through focus groups. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative data, and focus groups were analyzed using thematic analysis. Participant retention (94.74%), attendance (93.52%), dose delivered (98.94%), fidelity (98.5%), engagement (4.97/5) and program satisfaction (4/5) were high. Focus groups (n = 6; 28 participants) revealed that participants learned about nutrition, enjoyed being advocates and improved snacking behaviors.

检查纽约市促进健康零食的青年宣传计划的可行性:混合方法过程评估。
来自城市社区的青少年有不健康零食行为的风险。青少年宣传干预已被证明可以改善某些青少年健康行为,如药物使用。然而,目前尚不清楚青少年倡导是否是一种推广健康零食的可行方法。因此,本研究的目的是通过进行混合方法的过程评估来检验在纽约市青少年中推广健康零食的青年宣传计划的可行性。纽约市一个男孩女孩俱乐部的青少年(12-18岁)被招募参加《青年参与和行动促进健康》的12期改编版!倡导在街角商店推广健康零食的计划。采用混合方法进行过程评估,以评估招募、覆盖范围(出勤率)、提供剂量(提供的干预量)、保真度(根据课程实施干预的程度)和接受剂量(参与者参与/满意度)。满意度也通过焦点小组进行评估。定量数据采用描述性统计,焦点群体采用专题分析。参与者保留率(94.74%)、出勤率(93.52%)、给药率(98.94%)、保真度(98.5%)、参与度(4.97/5)和项目满意度(4/5)较高。焦点小组(n = 6;28名参与者)透露,参与者学习了营养知识,喜欢成为倡导者,并改善了吃零食的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Publishing original, refereed papers, Health Education Research deals with all the vital issues involved in health education and promotion worldwide - providing a valuable link between the health education research and practice communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信