Evaluation of intratracheal salbutamol effects in addition to surfactant in the clinical course of premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Razieh Moazami Goudarzi, Zohreh Badiee, Alireza Sadeghnia, Behzad Barekatain
{"title":"Evaluation of intratracheal salbutamol effects in addition to surfactant in the clinical course of premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome.","authors":"Razieh Moazami Goudarzi,&nbsp;Zohreh Badiee,&nbsp;Alireza Sadeghnia,&nbsp;Behzad Barekatain","doi":"10.4103/jrms.jrms_548_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In addition to surfactant deficiency, secretion of fluid from blood to the lungs and increase in the fluid content of the lung play significant roles in the pathogenesis of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effect of salbutamol (a beta-agonist) on fluid clearance from the lungs in neonates with RDS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized controlled clinical trial included 82 neonates with RDS admitted to the neonatal intensive care units of Alzahra and Shahid Beheshti Hospitals of Isfahan University of Medical Science from 2017 to 2018. Patients were recruited through convenience sampling. They were randomized into two groups, using simple randomization: 42 were only treated with intra-tracheal surfactant (control group) and 40 with intra-tracheal surfactant plus salbutamol (intervention group). The two groups were compared regarding intubation surfactant administration and extubation (INSURE) failure, duration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure, intubation, oxygen therapy, morbidity, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>INSURE failure leading to mechanical ventilation occurred in 3 neonates in the control group and 2 in the intervention group (<i>P</i> = 0.680). Mean hospital length of stay did not differ significantly between groups (<i>P</i> = 0.230). Comparison of controls with the intervention group regarding complications and the incidence of morbidities revealed no statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings of this study were not in favor of the routine use of salbutamol in neonates with RDS as it did not improve the course of the disease among newborns.</p>","PeriodicalId":50062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"28 ","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1e/2e/JRMS-28-53.PMC10366974.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_548_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In addition to surfactant deficiency, secretion of fluid from blood to the lungs and increase in the fluid content of the lung play significant roles in the pathogenesis of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effect of salbutamol (a beta-agonist) on fluid clearance from the lungs in neonates with RDS.

Materials and methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial included 82 neonates with RDS admitted to the neonatal intensive care units of Alzahra and Shahid Beheshti Hospitals of Isfahan University of Medical Science from 2017 to 2018. Patients were recruited through convenience sampling. They were randomized into two groups, using simple randomization: 42 were only treated with intra-tracheal surfactant (control group) and 40 with intra-tracheal surfactant plus salbutamol (intervention group). The two groups were compared regarding intubation surfactant administration and extubation (INSURE) failure, duration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure, intubation, oxygen therapy, morbidity, and mortality.

Results: INSURE failure leading to mechanical ventilation occurred in 3 neonates in the control group and 2 in the intervention group (P = 0.680). Mean hospital length of stay did not differ significantly between groups (P = 0.230). Comparison of controls with the intervention group regarding complications and the incidence of morbidities revealed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Findings of this study were not in favor of the routine use of salbutamol in neonates with RDS as it did not improve the course of the disease among newborns.

Abstract Image

气管内沙丁胺醇加表面活性剂在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征临床过程中的作用评价。
背景:呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的发病机制中,除表面活性物质缺乏外,血液向肺的分泌和肺液含量的增加也起着重要作用。因此,我们旨在评估沙丁胺醇(一种β激动剂)对新生儿RDS肺部液体清除的影响。材料与方法:本随机对照临床试验纳入2017 - 2018年伊斯法罕医科大学Alzahra和Shahid Beheshti医院新生儿重症监护室收治的82例RDS新生儿。采用方便抽样方法招募患者。采用简单随机法将患者随机分为两组:单纯气管内表面活性剂组42例(对照组),气管内表面活性剂加沙丁胺醇组40例(干预组)。比较两组患者的插管表面活性剂给药和拔管失败、鼻持续气道正压持续时间、插管、氧疗、发病率和死亡率。结果:对照组发生3例新生儿INSURE失效导致机械通气,干预组发生2例(P = 0.680)。平均住院时间组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.230)。对照组与干预组的并发症及发病率比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:本研究结果不赞成在新生儿RDS中常规使用沙丁胺醇,因为它不能改善新生儿的病程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online continuous journal with print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jmsjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信