Use of subgroup-specific hematopoietic stem cell collection efficiencies to improve truncation calculations for large-volume leukapheresis procedures

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Kai J. Rogers MD, PhD, Sarah L. Mott MS, Meredith G. Parsons MD, Annette J. Schlueter MD, PhD
{"title":"Use of subgroup-specific hematopoietic stem cell collection efficiencies to improve truncation calculations for large-volume leukapheresis procedures","authors":"Kai J. Rogers MD, PhD,&nbsp;Sarah L. Mott MS,&nbsp;Meredith G. Parsons MD,&nbsp;Annette J. Schlueter MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jca.22077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>A critical component of optimizing peripheral blood (PB) hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) collections is accurately determining the processed blood volume required to collect the targeted number of HSCs. Fundamental to most truncation equations employed to determine this volume is the procedure's estimated collection efficiency (CE), which is typically applied uniformly across all HSC collections. Few studies have explored the utility of using different CEs in subpopulations of donors that have substantially different CEs than the institutional average.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Initial procedures from 343 autologous and 179 allogeneic HSC collections performed from 2018 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Predictive equations were developed to determine theoretical truncation rates in various donor subgroups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Quantitative variables (pre-procedure cell counts) and qualitative variables (relatedness to recipient, gender, method of venous access, and mobilization strategy) were found to significantly impact CE. However, much of the variability in CE between donors could not be explained by the variables assessed. Analyses of procedures with high pre-collection PB cell counts identified lower CE values for these donors' truncation equations which still allow truncation but minimize risk of collecting less CD34+ cells than requested.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Individualized CE does not substantially improve truncation volume calculations over use of a fixed CE and adds complexity to these calculations. The optimal fixed CE varies between autologous and allogeneic donors, and donors with high pre-collection PB cell counts in either of these groups. This model will be clinically validated and continuously refined through analysis of future HSC collections.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"38 6","pages":"664-676"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jca.22077","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.22077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

A critical component of optimizing peripheral blood (PB) hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) collections is accurately determining the processed blood volume required to collect the targeted number of HSCs. Fundamental to most truncation equations employed to determine this volume is the procedure's estimated collection efficiency (CE), which is typically applied uniformly across all HSC collections. Few studies have explored the utility of using different CEs in subpopulations of donors that have substantially different CEs than the institutional average.

Methods

Initial procedures from 343 autologous and 179 allogeneic HSC collections performed from 2018 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Predictive equations were developed to determine theoretical truncation rates in various donor subgroups.

Results

Quantitative variables (pre-procedure cell counts) and qualitative variables (relatedness to recipient, gender, method of venous access, and mobilization strategy) were found to significantly impact CE. However, much of the variability in CE between donors could not be explained by the variables assessed. Analyses of procedures with high pre-collection PB cell counts identified lower CE values for these donors' truncation equations which still allow truncation but minimize risk of collecting less CD34+ cells than requested.

Conclusions

Individualized CE does not substantially improve truncation volume calculations over use of a fixed CE and adds complexity to these calculations. The optimal fixed CE varies between autologous and allogeneic donors, and donors with high pre-collection PB cell counts in either of these groups. This model will be clinically validated and continuously refined through analysis of future HSC collections.

Abstract Image

利用特定亚组的造血干细胞采集效率,改进大容量白细胞分离程序的截断计算
优化外周血(PB)造血干细胞(HSC)收集的一个关键组成部分是准确确定收集目标数量的HSC所需的处理血容量。用于确定该体积的大多数截断方程的基础是程序的估计收集效率(CE),它通常统一应用于所有HSC收集。很少有研究探索在与机构平均水平有很大差异的捐助者亚群中使用不同ce的效用。方法回顾性分析2018年至2021年收集的343例自体和179例异体造血干细胞的初始处理方法。建立了预测方程来确定各种供体亚组的理论截断率。结果发现定量变量(术前细胞计数)和定性变量(与受体的相关性、性别、静脉通路方法和动员策略)对CE有显著影响。然而,供体间CE的大部分差异不能用评估的变量来解释。对收集前PB细胞计数较高的程序进行分析,发现这些供体的截断方程的CE值较低,这仍然允许截断,但将收集到的CD34+细胞少于要求的风险降至最低。结论:与使用固定CE相比,个体化CE并没有显著改善截断体积计算,反而增加了这些计算的复杂性。最优固定CE在自体和异体供体以及采集前PB细胞计数较高的供体之间存在差异。该模型将经过临床验证,并通过分析未来的HSC标本不断完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信