Intervention to reduce age bias in medical students' decision making for the treatment of older women with breast cancer: A novel approach to bias training.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1080/07347332.2023.2214548
Daisy Neal, Jenna L Morgan, Thomas Ormerod, Malcolm W R Reed
{"title":"Intervention to reduce age bias in medical students' decision making for the treatment of older women with breast cancer: A novel approach to bias training.","authors":"Daisy Neal, Jenna L Morgan, Thomas Ormerod, Malcolm W R Reed","doi":"10.1080/07347332.2023.2214548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Despite NICE guidelines to 'treat people with invasive breast cancer, irrespective of age, with surgery and appropriate systemic therapy, rather than endocrine therapy alone', older patients receive differential treatment and experience worse outcomes. Research has evidenced the prevalence of ageism and identified the role of implicit bias in reflecting and potentially perpetuating disparities across society, including in healthcare. Yet age bias has rarely been considered as an explanatory factor in poorer outcomes for older breast cancer patients nor, consequentially, has removing age bias been considered as an approach to improving outcomes. Many organizations carry out bias training with the aim of reducing negative impacts from biased decision making, yet the few evaluations of these interventions have mostly seen small or negative effects. This study explores whether a novel intervention to address age bias leads to better quality decision making for the treatment of older women with breast cancer.<b>Methods:</b> An online study compared medical students' treatment recommendations for older breast cancer patients and the reasoning for their decision making before and after a novel bias training intervention. Thirty-one medical students participated in the study.<b>Results:</b> The results show that the bias training intervention led medical students to make better quality decisions for older breast cancer patients. The quality of decision making was measured by decreases in age-based decision making and increased efforts to include patients in decision making. These results suggest there is value in exploring whether if anti-bias training interventions could usefully be applied in other areas of practice where older patients experience poorer outcomes.<b>Conclusions:</b> This study evidences that bias training improves the quality of decision making by medical students in respect of older breast cancer patients. The study findings show promise that this novel approach to bias training might usefully be applied to all medical practitioners making treatment recommendations for older patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"48-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2023.2214548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Despite NICE guidelines to 'treat people with invasive breast cancer, irrespective of age, with surgery and appropriate systemic therapy, rather than endocrine therapy alone', older patients receive differential treatment and experience worse outcomes. Research has evidenced the prevalence of ageism and identified the role of implicit bias in reflecting and potentially perpetuating disparities across society, including in healthcare. Yet age bias has rarely been considered as an explanatory factor in poorer outcomes for older breast cancer patients nor, consequentially, has removing age bias been considered as an approach to improving outcomes. Many organizations carry out bias training with the aim of reducing negative impacts from biased decision making, yet the few evaluations of these interventions have mostly seen small or negative effects. This study explores whether a novel intervention to address age bias leads to better quality decision making for the treatment of older women with breast cancer.Methods: An online study compared medical students' treatment recommendations for older breast cancer patients and the reasoning for their decision making before and after a novel bias training intervention. Thirty-one medical students participated in the study.Results: The results show that the bias training intervention led medical students to make better quality decisions for older breast cancer patients. The quality of decision making was measured by decreases in age-based decision making and increased efforts to include patients in decision making. These results suggest there is value in exploring whether if anti-bias training interventions could usefully be applied in other areas of practice where older patients experience poorer outcomes.Conclusions: This study evidences that bias training improves the quality of decision making by medical students in respect of older breast cancer patients. The study findings show promise that this novel approach to bias training might usefully be applied to all medical practitioners making treatment recommendations for older patients.

采取干预措施,减少医科学生在为老年乳腺癌女性患者提供治疗决策时的年龄偏差:偏见培训的新方法。
目标:尽管 NICE 指导方针规定 "无论年龄大小,浸润性乳腺癌患者均应接受手术和适当的系统治疗,而不是仅接受内分泌治疗",但老年患者接受的治疗却存在差异,治疗效果也较差。研究证明了年龄歧视的普遍性,并确定了隐性偏见在反映和可能延续整个社会(包括医疗保健领域)的差异方面所起的作用。然而,年龄偏见很少被认为是老年乳腺癌患者治疗效果较差的一个解释因素,因此,消除年龄偏见也很少被认为是改善治疗效果的一种方法。许多机构开展了偏见培训,目的是减少有偏见的决策带来的负面影响,但对这些干预措施进行的少数评估大多发现效果很小或为负面。本研究探讨了针对年龄偏差的新型干预措施是否会提高老年女性乳腺癌患者治疗决策的质量:方法:一项在线研究比较了医科学生对老年乳腺癌患者的治疗建议,以及他们在接受新型偏见培训干预前后做出决策的理由。31名医科学生参与了研究:结果表明,偏差训练干预使医学生为老年乳腺癌患者做出了更高质量的决策。决策质量的衡量标准是基于年龄的决策减少,以及在决策中更多地考虑患者。这些结果表明,探讨是否可以将反偏见培训干预措施有效地应用于老年患者治疗效果较差的其他实践领域是有价值的:本研究证明,偏见培训可提高医科学生对老年乳腺癌患者的决策质量。研究结果表明,这种新颖的偏见培训方法有望应用于所有为老年患者提供治疗建议的医疗从业人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Here is your single source of integrated information on providing the best psychosocial care possible from the knowledge available from many disciplines.The Journal of Psychosocial Oncology is an essential source for up-to-date clinical and research material geared toward health professionals who provide psychosocial services to cancer patients, their families, and their caregivers. The journal—the first interdisciplinary resource of its kind—is in its third decade of examining exploratory and hypothesis testing and presenting program evaluation research on critical areas, including: the stigma of cancer; employment and personal problems facing cancer patients; patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信