Step 3: Critically Appraising Evidence: Quality Improvement Projects.

IF 0.6 Q4 NURSING
Susan Givens Bell
{"title":"Step 3: Critically Appraising Evidence: Quality Improvement Projects.","authors":"Susan Givens Bell","doi":"10.1891/NN-2023-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critical appraisal of the literature is the third step in the evidence-based practice process. There are 2 types of Level VI evidence, such as single qualitative studies and quality improvement (QI) projects. The process for critical appraisal of a single qualitative study is the same as that for an appraisal of a systematic review or metasynthesis of qualitative studies, as described in a previous evidence-based practice column. This column will describe the critical appraisal of QI projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":46706,"journal":{"name":"Neonatal Network","volume":"42 4","pages":"233-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatal Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/NN-2023-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critical appraisal of the literature is the third step in the evidence-based practice process. There are 2 types of Level VI evidence, such as single qualitative studies and quality improvement (QI) projects. The process for critical appraisal of a single qualitative study is the same as that for an appraisal of a systematic review or metasynthesis of qualitative studies, as described in a previous evidence-based practice column. This column will describe the critical appraisal of QI projects.

步骤3:批判性地评估证据:质量改进项目。
对文献的批判性评价是循证实践过程的第三步。第六级证据有两种类型,即单一的定性研究和质量改进(QI)项目。对单个定性研究进行批判性评估的过程与对定性研究的系统评价或综合评价的过程相同,如之前的循证实践专栏所述。本专栏将描述对QI项目的关键评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neonatal Network
Neonatal Network NURSING-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
87
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信