Implicit Racial Bias Attitudes and Mitigation in Neonatal Nurse Practitioners: A Quality Improvement Project.

IF 0.6 Q4 NURSING
Nicole R Hutcheson, Brigit Carter, John Cowden, Barbara Turner
{"title":"Implicit Racial Bias Attitudes and Mitigation in Neonatal Nurse Practitioners: A Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Nicole R Hutcheson,&nbsp;Brigit Carter,&nbsp;John Cowden,&nbsp;Barbara Turner","doi":"10.1891/NN-2023-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>to assess the impact of education using the implicit bias recognition and management (IBRM) teaching approach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>longitudinal quasi-experimental design. Surveys at baseline, immediate postimplementation, and 4-week postimplementation using the modified version of the Attitudes Toward Implicit Bias Instrument (ATIBI). The 4-week survey included items about implicit bias recognition and mitigation strategies.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>thirty-six neonatal nurse practitioners assigned to the NICU in a Midwest urban children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used, and the score range was 16-96. The results showed a statistically significant model, <i>F</i> (1.49, 707.97) = 34.46, <i>p</i> <.001, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.496. Pairwise comparisons showed improvement from pre (<i>M</i> = 73.08, SD = 9.36) to immediate postimplementation (<i>M</i> = 80.06, SD = 8.19), <i>p</i> <.001. Scores were sustained at 4-week postimplementation (<i>M</i> = 79.28, SD = 10.39), <i>p</i> = .744.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IBRM teaching approach improved scores from baseline on a modified ATIBI that remained improved 4 weeks after the education.</p>","PeriodicalId":46706,"journal":{"name":"Neonatal Network","volume":"42 4","pages":"192-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatal Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/NN-2023-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: to assess the impact of education using the implicit bias recognition and management (IBRM) teaching approach.

Design: longitudinal quasi-experimental design. Surveys at baseline, immediate postimplementation, and 4-week postimplementation using the modified version of the Attitudes Toward Implicit Bias Instrument (ATIBI). The 4-week survey included items about implicit bias recognition and mitigation strategies.

Sample: thirty-six neonatal nurse practitioners assigned to the NICU in a Midwest urban children's hospital.

Results: one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used, and the score range was 16-96. The results showed a statistically significant model, F (1.49, 707.97) = 34.46, p <.001, partial η2 = 0.496. Pairwise comparisons showed improvement from pre (M = 73.08, SD = 9.36) to immediate postimplementation (M = 80.06, SD = 8.19), p <.001. Scores were sustained at 4-week postimplementation (M = 79.28, SD = 10.39), p = .744.

Conclusions: The IBRM teaching approach improved scores from baseline on a modified ATIBI that remained improved 4 weeks after the education.

新生儿护士从业人员的内隐种族偏见态度和缓解:一个质量改进项目。
目的:利用内隐偏见识别与管理(IBRM)教学方法评估教育的影响。设计:纵向准实验设计。使用改进版本的内隐偏见态度量表(ATIBI)在基线、实施后立即和实施后4周进行调查。为期四周的调查项目包括内隐偏见识别和缓解策略。样本:分配到中西部城市儿童医院新生儿重症监护室的36名新生儿护士从业人员。结果:采用单因素重复测量方差分析,评分范围为16 ~ 96分。结果显示模型具有统计学意义,F (1.49, 707.97) = 34.46, p 2 = 0.496。两两比较显示,从实施前(M = 73.08, SD = 9.36)到立即实施后(M = 80.06, SD = 8.19)改善,p M = 79.28, SD = 10.39), p = 0.744。结论:IBRM教学方法提高了改良ATIBI的基线分数,并在教育后4周保持提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neonatal Network
Neonatal Network NURSING-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
87
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信