"The CDC Won't Let Me Be": The Opinion Dynamics of Support for CDC Regulatory Authority.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Matthew Motta, Timothy Callaghan, Kristin Lunz Trujillo
{"title":"\"The CDC Won't Let Me Be\": The Opinion Dynamics of Support for CDC Regulatory Authority.","authors":"Matthew Motta, Timothy Callaghan, Kristin Lunz Trujillo","doi":"10.1215/03616878-10852592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The CDC's ability to respond to communicable disease threats has recently met significant political and legal opposition. The authors unpack the influence of political ideology on support for CDC authority, and they experimentally assess whether highlighting ideology's role in responding to health threats might bolster CDC support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors fielded a demographically representative online survey experiment to 5,483 US adults. They assessed the sociopolitical correlates of CDC attitudes via multivariate regression analyses limited to a study-wide treatment group. Additionally, they tested the effectiveness of their experimental treatments via multivariate models that interact indicators of stimulus exposure with political ideology.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Although most Americans support the CDC's role in responding to health crises, self-identified conservatives are significantly less likely to do so. This effect holds when accounting for respondents' limited government and anti-expert attitudes, which the authors replicated in nationally representative data. Encouragingly, though, emphasizing the CDC's role in combating the spread of COVID-19 is associated with significantly stronger levels of support on the ideological right.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts to communicate the CDC's importance in responding to health threats can help bridge existing ideological divides and might create an incentive for policy makers to codify the agency's regulatory powers.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":" ","pages":"829-857"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-10852592","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The CDC's ability to respond to communicable disease threats has recently met significant political and legal opposition. The authors unpack the influence of political ideology on support for CDC authority, and they experimentally assess whether highlighting ideology's role in responding to health threats might bolster CDC support.

Methods: The authors fielded a demographically representative online survey experiment to 5,483 US adults. They assessed the sociopolitical correlates of CDC attitudes via multivariate regression analyses limited to a study-wide treatment group. Additionally, they tested the effectiveness of their experimental treatments via multivariate models that interact indicators of stimulus exposure with political ideology.

Findings: Although most Americans support the CDC's role in responding to health crises, self-identified conservatives are significantly less likely to do so. This effect holds when accounting for respondents' limited government and anti-expert attitudes, which the authors replicated in nationally representative data. Encouragingly, though, emphasizing the CDC's role in combating the spread of COVID-19 is associated with significantly stronger levels of support on the ideological right.

Conclusions: Efforts to communicate the CDC's importance in responding to health threats can help bridge existing ideological divides and might create an incentive for policy makers to codify the agency's regulatory powers.

“疾控中心不会放过我”:支持疾控中心监管机构的意见动态。
背景:美国疾病控制与预防中心应对传染病威胁的能力最近遭到了重大的政治和法律反对。作者揭示了政治意识形态对支持疾病控制与预防中心权威的影响,并通过实验评估了强调意识形态在应对健康威胁中的作用是否会加强疾病控制与治疗中心的支持。方法:作者对5483名美国成年人进行了一项具有人口学代表性的在线调查实验。他们通过仅限于研究范围内的治疗组的多元回归分析,评估了疾病控制与预防中心态度的社会政治相关性。此外,他们通过多变量模型测试了实验治疗的有效性,这些模型将刺激暴露指标与政治意识形态相互作用。调查结果:尽管大多数美国人支持美国疾病控制与预防中心在应对健康危机方面的作用,但自我认同的保守派却不太可能这样做。考虑到受访者有限的政府和反专家态度,这种影响是成立的,作者在全国代表性数据中重复了这一点。然而,令人鼓舞的是,强调疾控中心在抗击新冠肺炎传播方面的作用与意识形态右翼的支持水平显著提高有关。结论:努力传达美国疾病控制与预防中心在应对健康威胁方面的重要性,有助于弥合现有的意识形态分歧,并可能激励政策制定者将该机构的监管权力编纂成文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信