Treatment algorithm for post sternotomy wound infection - our experience.

Q4 Medicine
K N Manjunath, M S Venkatesh, B P Sanmathi, S Shanthakumar, G Abhijit, S Anam, S Ravishankar
{"title":"Treatment algorithm for post sternotomy wound infection - our experience.","authors":"K N Manjunath,&nbsp;M S Venkatesh,&nbsp;B P Sanmathi,&nbsp;S Shanthakumar,&nbsp;G Abhijit,&nbsp;S Anam,&nbsp;S Ravishankar","doi":"10.48095/ccachp202313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Median sternotomy is the most commonly used approach in open cardiac surgery. As in any other surgery, surgical site infections are a known phenomenon, but morbidity depends on the depth of infection. Superficial wound infections can be managed conservatively; however, deep sternal wound infections need an aggressive approach to prevent disastrous consequence like mediastinitis. Hence, this study was conducted with the aim to classify sternotomy wound infection and to develop a treatment algorithm for superficial and deep sternotomy wound infections.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Between January 2016 to August 2021, 25 patients who had sternotomy wound infections were studied. These wound infections were classified as superficial or deep sternal wound infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Superficial wound infections underwent treatment with diluted vinegar dressings and deep infections underwent treatment with bilateral pectoralis major muscle advancement flaps. Patients were followed up till the wounds healed completely without complications. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, duration of treatment and outcomes of treatment were analyzed. Superficial sternal wound infection patients responded favorably to diluted vinegar dressings and deep sternal wound infection patients to pectoralis major muscle advancement flaps. Average time duration of healing for superficial and deep wound infections was 66.2 days and 18 days respectively. None of the patients had an increased severity of infection or re-dehiscence following treatment and during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Relatively conservative approach using diluted vinegar (1% acetic acid) dressing for superficial sternal wound infections was efficacious, whereas aggressive debridement and bilateral pectoralis major advancement muscle flaps for deep sternal wound infections are necessary for favorable outcomes. However, more studies are needed to ascertain this treatment algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":7098,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae plasticae","volume":"65 1","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae plasticae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccachp202313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Median sternotomy is the most commonly used approach in open cardiac surgery. As in any other surgery, surgical site infections are a known phenomenon, but morbidity depends on the depth of infection. Superficial wound infections can be managed conservatively; however, deep sternal wound infections need an aggressive approach to prevent disastrous consequence like mediastinitis. Hence, this study was conducted with the aim to classify sternotomy wound infection and to develop a treatment algorithm for superficial and deep sternotomy wound infections.

Material and methods: Between January 2016 to August 2021, 25 patients who had sternotomy wound infections were studied. These wound infections were classified as superficial or deep sternal wound infections.

Results: Superficial wound infections underwent treatment with diluted vinegar dressings and deep infections underwent treatment with bilateral pectoralis major muscle advancement flaps. Patients were followed up till the wounds healed completely without complications. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, duration of treatment and outcomes of treatment were analyzed. Superficial sternal wound infection patients responded favorably to diluted vinegar dressings and deep sternal wound infection patients to pectoralis major muscle advancement flaps. Average time duration of healing for superficial and deep wound infections was 66.2 days and 18 days respectively. None of the patients had an increased severity of infection or re-dehiscence following treatment and during follow-up.

Conclusion: Relatively conservative approach using diluted vinegar (1% acetic acid) dressing for superficial sternal wound infections was efficacious, whereas aggressive debridement and bilateral pectoralis major advancement muscle flaps for deep sternal wound infections are necessary for favorable outcomes. However, more studies are needed to ascertain this treatment algorithm.

胸骨切开术后伤口感染的治疗方法-我们的经验。
胸骨正中切开术是心脏直视手术中最常用的入路。与其他手术一样,手术部位感染是一种已知的现象,但发病率取决于感染的深度。浅表伤口感染可保守处理;然而,深胸骨伤口感染需要积极的方法来防止灾难性的后果,如纵隔炎。因此,本研究旨在对胸骨切开术伤口感染进行分类,并制定胸骨切开术浅层和深部伤口感染的治疗算法。材料与方法:选取2016年1月至2021年8月25例胸骨切口感染患者作为研究对象。这些伤口感染分为浅胸骨伤口感染和深胸骨伤口感染。结果:浅表感染采用稀释醋敷料治疗,深部感染采用双侧胸大肌推进皮瓣治疗。随访至创面完全愈合无并发症。分析患者特征、合并症、治疗时间和治疗结果。胸骨浅创面感染患者对稀释醋敷料反应良好,胸骨深创面感染患者对胸大肌推进皮瓣反应良好。浅表和深部伤口感染的平均愈合时间分别为66.2 d和18 d。在治疗后和随访期间,没有患者感染或再裂开的严重程度增加。结论:相对保守的胸骨浅表伤口感染采用稀释醋(1%醋酸)敷料治疗是有效的,而积极清创和双侧胸大肌推进皮瓣治疗胸骨深部伤口感染是必要的,以获得良好的效果。然而,需要更多的研究来确定这种治疗算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta chirurgiae plasticae
Acta chirurgiae plasticae Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信