Inter-placental variability is not a major factor affecting the healing efficiency of amniotic membrane when used for treating chronic non-healing wounds.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
Cell and Tissue Banking Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s10561-023-10096-y
Vojtech Horvath, Alzbeta Svobodova, Joao Victor Cabral, Radovan Fiala, Jan Burkert, Petr Stadler, Jaroslav Lindner, Jan Bednar, Martina Zemlickova, Katerina Jirsova
{"title":"Inter-placental variability is not a major factor affecting the healing efficiency of amniotic membrane when used for treating chronic non-healing wounds.","authors":"Vojtech Horvath,&nbsp;Alzbeta Svobodova,&nbsp;Joao Victor Cabral,&nbsp;Radovan Fiala,&nbsp;Jan Burkert,&nbsp;Petr Stadler,&nbsp;Jaroslav Lindner,&nbsp;Jan Bednar,&nbsp;Martina Zemlickova,&nbsp;Katerina Jirsova","doi":"10.1007/s10561-023-10096-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cryopreserved amniotic membrane (AM) grafts in chronic wound healing, including the mean percentage of wound closure per one AM application, and to determine whether the healing efficiency differs between AM grafts obtained from different placentas. A retrospective study analyzing inter-placental differences in healing capacity and mean wound closure after the application of 96 AM grafts prepared from nine placentas. Only the placentas from which the AM grafts were applied to patients suffering from long-lasting non-healing wounds successfully healed by AM treatment were included. The data from the rapidly progressing wound-closure phase (p-phase) were analyzed. The mean efficiency for each placenta, expressed as an average of wound area reduction (%) seven days after the AM application (baseline, 100%), was calculated from at least 10 applications. No statistical difference between the nine placentas' efficiency was found in the progressive phase of wound healing. The 7-day average wound reduction in particular placentas varied from 5.70 to 20.99% (median from 1.07 to 17.75) of the baseline. The mean percentage of wound surface reduction of all analyzed defects one week after the application of cryopreserved AM graft was 12.17 ± 20.12% (average ± SD). No significant difference in healing capacity was observed between the nine placentas. The data suggest that if there are intra- and inter-placental differences in AM sheets' healing efficacy, they are overridden by the actual health status of the subject or even the status of its individual wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":9723,"journal":{"name":"Cell and Tissue Banking","volume":" ","pages":"779-788"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616215/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell and Tissue Banking","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-023-10096-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cryopreserved amniotic membrane (AM) grafts in chronic wound healing, including the mean percentage of wound closure per one AM application, and to determine whether the healing efficiency differs between AM grafts obtained from different placentas. A retrospective study analyzing inter-placental differences in healing capacity and mean wound closure after the application of 96 AM grafts prepared from nine placentas. Only the placentas from which the AM grafts were applied to patients suffering from long-lasting non-healing wounds successfully healed by AM treatment were included. The data from the rapidly progressing wound-closure phase (p-phase) were analyzed. The mean efficiency for each placenta, expressed as an average of wound area reduction (%) seven days after the AM application (baseline, 100%), was calculated from at least 10 applications. No statistical difference between the nine placentas' efficiency was found in the progressive phase of wound healing. The 7-day average wound reduction in particular placentas varied from 5.70 to 20.99% (median from 1.07 to 17.75) of the baseline. The mean percentage of wound surface reduction of all analyzed defects one week after the application of cryopreserved AM graft was 12.17 ± 20.12% (average ± SD). No significant difference in healing capacity was observed between the nine placentas. The data suggest that if there are intra- and inter-placental differences in AM sheets' healing efficacy, they are overridden by the actual health status of the subject or even the status of its individual wounds.

Abstract Image

当用于治疗慢性不愈合伤口时,胎盘间变异性不是影响羊膜愈合效率的主要因素。
本研究旨在评估冷冻保存的羊膜(AM)移植物在慢性伤口愈合中的疗效,包括每次应用AM的平均伤口闭合百分比,并确定从不同胎盘获得的AM移植物的愈合效率是否不同。一项回顾性研究分析了应用从9个胎盘制备的96个AM移植物后,胎盘间愈合能力和平均伤口闭合率的差异。仅包括AM移植物用于AM治疗成功治愈的长期不愈合伤口的患者的胎盘。对快速进行伤口闭合期(p期)的数据进行分析。每个胎盘的平均效率,表示为AM应用后7天(基线,100%)伤口面积减少的平均值(%),是从至少10次应用中计算出来的。在伤口愈合的进展阶段,九种胎盘的效率没有统计学差异。特别是胎盘的7天平均伤口减少率为基线的5.70至20.99%(中位数为1.07至17.75)。应用冷冻保存AM移植物一周后,所有分析缺陷的伤口表面减少的平均百分比为12.17 ± 20.12%(平均值 ± SD)。九个胎盘之间的愈合能力没有显著差异。数据表明,如果AM片的治疗效果存在胎盘内和胎盘间的差异,则受试者的实际健康状况甚至其单个伤口的状况都会超过这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cell and Tissue Banking
Cell and Tissue Banking CELL BIOLOGY-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cell and Tissue Banking provides a forum for disseminating information to scientists and clinicians involved in the banking and transplantation of cells and tissues. Cell and Tissue Banking is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers in the following areas: basic research concerning general aspects of tissue banking such as quality assurance and control of banked cells/tissues, effects of preservation and sterilisation methods on cells/tissues, biotechnology, etc.; clinical applications of banked cells/tissues; standards of practice in procurement, processing, storage and distribution of cells/tissues; ethical issues; medico-legal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信