Medics as influencers: a historical analysis of British Army military medical exercises in Kenya over two decades.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patricia Falconer Hall, T Falconer Hall, Z Bailey, S T Horne
{"title":"Medics as influencers: a historical analysis of British Army military medical exercises in Kenya over two decades.","authors":"Patricia Falconer Hall, T Falconer Hall, Z Bailey, S T Horne","doi":"10.1136/military-2023-002442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Annual British Army medical training exercises have run in Kenya since the early 1990s, initially with a dual purpose-to deliver the Kenyan Extended Programme of Immunisation (in remote locations) and to undertake austere training. This provided a specific response to a capability gap request from the partner nation, but as this gap closed, the exercise changed in various ways. This study aimed to qualitatively explore the impact of these exercises on the Kenyan healthcare system and the influence and relationships between the nations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted for 10 former senior commanders and medical officers who had deployed in key command and clinical positions from 1993 to 2019. Three researchers conducted thematic content analysis on the key-informant interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five domains with 18 subdomains formed the study's analysis framework. 16 recurring themes were identified and placed into four categories that denote if they were of benefit to the engagement, enabled success, had the potential to cause harm or were a barrier to successful engagement. Three distinct phases of the exercise were identified: supporting Kenyan vaccinations, direct clinical care, training and education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first qualitative analysis of the impact of a British Defence Engagement (Health) on the partner nation and UK influence gained through it. It has identified factors which may improve outcomes, namely, ensuring sustainability and continuity between iterations; maintaining enduring stakeholder relationships; responding to a capability gap request; intelligence-led planning with incorporated assessment, monitoring and evaluation; adapting to changes in needs or contextual settings; while ensuring mutual benefit in objective setting. These may be used as the basis for a conceptual framework supporting the planning and execution of high-quality, mutually beneficial Defence Engagement (Health) activities in future. This framework and future research would also benefit from gaining perspectives from the partner nation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2023-002442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Annual British Army medical training exercises have run in Kenya since the early 1990s, initially with a dual purpose-to deliver the Kenyan Extended Programme of Immunisation (in remote locations) and to undertake austere training. This provided a specific response to a capability gap request from the partner nation, but as this gap closed, the exercise changed in various ways. This study aimed to qualitatively explore the impact of these exercises on the Kenyan healthcare system and the influence and relationships between the nations.

Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted for 10 former senior commanders and medical officers who had deployed in key command and clinical positions from 1993 to 2019. Three researchers conducted thematic content analysis on the key-informant interviews.

Results: Five domains with 18 subdomains formed the study's analysis framework. 16 recurring themes were identified and placed into four categories that denote if they were of benefit to the engagement, enabled success, had the potential to cause harm or were a barrier to successful engagement. Three distinct phases of the exercise were identified: supporting Kenyan vaccinations, direct clinical care, training and education.

Conclusions: This is the first qualitative analysis of the impact of a British Defence Engagement (Health) on the partner nation and UK influence gained through it. It has identified factors which may improve outcomes, namely, ensuring sustainability and continuity between iterations; maintaining enduring stakeholder relationships; responding to a capability gap request; intelligence-led planning with incorporated assessment, monitoring and evaluation; adapting to changes in needs or contextual settings; while ensuring mutual benefit in objective setting. These may be used as the basis for a conceptual framework supporting the planning and execution of high-quality, mutually beneficial Defence Engagement (Health) activities in future. This framework and future research would also benefit from gaining perspectives from the partner nation.

作为影响者的医务人员:二十年来英国军队在肯尼亚军事医疗演习的历史分析。
导言:自 20 世纪 90 年代初以来,英国陆军每年都在肯尼亚进行医疗培训演习,最初有两个目的--(在偏远地区)实施肯尼亚扩大免疫计划和进行艰苦训练。这是对伙伴国提出的能力差距要求的具体回应,但随着差距的缩小,演习也发生了各种变化。本研究旨在从定性角度探讨这些演习对肯尼亚医疗保健系统的影响以及两国之间的影响和关系:对 1993 年至 2019 年期间曾在重要指挥和临床岗位上工作的 10 名前高级指挥官和医务官员进行了半结构化访谈。三位研究人员对关键信息访谈进行了主题内容分析:五个领域和 18 个子领域构成了本研究的分析框架。确定了 16 个重复出现的主题,并将其分为四类,分别表示这些主题是否有利于参与、促成成功、有可能造成危害或成为成功参与的障碍。确定了活动的三个不同阶段:支持肯尼亚疫苗接种、直接临床护理、培训和教育:这是首次定性分析英国国防参与(卫生)对伙伴国的影响以及英国通过参与获得的影响力。它确定了可改善结果的因素,即确保迭代之间的可持续性和连续性;保持持久的利益相关者关系;响应能力差距请求;以情报为主导的规划,并纳入评估、监测和评价;适应需求或背景环境的变化;同时确保目标设定的互利性。这些可作为概念框架的基础,支持今后规划和执行高质量、互利的防务参与(卫生)活动。这一框架和未来的研究还将受益于伙伴国的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信