Rivaroxaban versus Apixaban for Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism in Patients at Lower Risk of Bleeding.

Kimberly Snow Caroti, Cecilia Becattini, Marc Carrier, Alexander T Cohen, Anders Ekbom, Alok A Khorana, Agnes Y Y Lee, Christopher Brescia, Khaled Abdelgawwad, George Psaroudakis, Marcela Rivera, Bernhard Schaefer, Gunnar Brobert, Craig I Coleman
{"title":"Rivaroxaban versus Apixaban for Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism in Patients at Lower Risk of Bleeding.","authors":"Kimberly Snow Caroti,&nbsp;Cecilia Becattini,&nbsp;Marc Carrier,&nbsp;Alexander T Cohen,&nbsp;Anders Ekbom,&nbsp;Alok A Khorana,&nbsp;Agnes Y Y Lee,&nbsp;Christopher Brescia,&nbsp;Khaled Abdelgawwad,&nbsp;George Psaroudakis,&nbsp;Marcela Rivera,&nbsp;Bernhard Schaefer,&nbsp;Gunnar Brobert,&nbsp;Craig I Coleman","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1770783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study, utilizing U.S. electronic health record (EHR) data from January 2013 to December 2020, sought to assess whether rivaroxaban and apixaban had similar effectiveness and safety in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with a cancer type not associated with a high risk of bleeding. We included adults diagnosed with active cancer, excluding esophageal, gastric, unresected colorectal, bladder, noncerebral central nervous system cancers and leukemia, who experienced VTE and received a therapeutic VTE dose of rivaroxaban or apixaban on day 7 post-VTE, and were active in the EHR ≥12 months prior to the VTE. Primary outcome was the composite of recurrent VTE or any bleed resulting in hospitalization at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included recurrent VTE, any bleed resulting in hospitalization, any critical organ bleed, and composites of these outcomes at 3 and 6 months. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We included 1,344 apixaban and 1,093 rivaroxaban patients. At 3 months, rivaroxaban was found to have similar hazard to apixaban for developing recurrent VTE or any bleed resulting in hospitalization (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.60-1.27). No differences were observed between cohorts for this outcome at 6 months (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.71-1.40) or for any other outcome at 3 or 6 months. In conclusion, patients receiving rivaroxaban or apixaban showed similar risks of the composite of recurrent VTE or any bleed resulting in hospitalization in patients with cancer-associated VTE. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05461807. <b>Key Points</b> Rivaroxaban and apixaban have similar effectiveness and safety for treatment of cancer-associated VTE through 6 months.Clinicians should therefore consider patient preference and adherence when choosing the optimal anticoagulant.</p>","PeriodicalId":22238,"journal":{"name":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10332896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1770783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This retrospective study, utilizing U.S. electronic health record (EHR) data from January 2013 to December 2020, sought to assess whether rivaroxaban and apixaban had similar effectiveness and safety in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with a cancer type not associated with a high risk of bleeding. We included adults diagnosed with active cancer, excluding esophageal, gastric, unresected colorectal, bladder, noncerebral central nervous system cancers and leukemia, who experienced VTE and received a therapeutic VTE dose of rivaroxaban or apixaban on day 7 post-VTE, and were active in the EHR ≥12 months prior to the VTE. Primary outcome was the composite of recurrent VTE or any bleed resulting in hospitalization at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included recurrent VTE, any bleed resulting in hospitalization, any critical organ bleed, and composites of these outcomes at 3 and 6 months. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We included 1,344 apixaban and 1,093 rivaroxaban patients. At 3 months, rivaroxaban was found to have similar hazard to apixaban for developing recurrent VTE or any bleed resulting in hospitalization (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.60-1.27). No differences were observed between cohorts for this outcome at 6 months (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.71-1.40) or for any other outcome at 3 or 6 months. In conclusion, patients receiving rivaroxaban or apixaban showed similar risks of the composite of recurrent VTE or any bleed resulting in hospitalization in patients with cancer-associated VTE. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05461807. Key Points Rivaroxaban and apixaban have similar effectiveness and safety for treatment of cancer-associated VTE through 6 months.Clinicians should therefore consider patient preference and adherence when choosing the optimal anticoagulant.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利伐沙班与阿哌沙班在低出血风险患者中治疗癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞。
这项回顾性研究利用2013年1月至2020年12月的美国电子健康记录(EHR)数据,试图评估利伐沙班和阿哌沙班在治疗癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)方面是否具有相似的有效性和安全性,这些癌症类型与出血高风险无关。我们纳入了被诊断为活动性癌症的成年人,不包括食道癌、胃癌、未切除的结直肠癌、膀胱癌、非脑中枢神经系统癌和白血病,他们经历过静脉血栓栓塞,并在静脉血栓栓塞后第7天接受了利伐沙班或阿哌沙班的治疗性静脉血栓栓塞剂量,并且在静脉血栓栓塞前的EHR中活跃≥12个月。主要结局是静脉血栓栓塞复发或任何出血导致住院3个月。次要结局包括静脉血栓栓塞复发、任何导致住院的出血、任何关键器官出血,以及3个月和6个月时这些结局的综合。采用治疗加权Cox回归的逆概率计算95%置信区间的风险比(hr)。我们纳入了1,344名阿哌沙班患者和1,093名利伐沙班患者。在3个月时,发现利伐沙班与阿哌沙班在静脉血栓栓塞复发或任何出血导致住院方面具有相似的危险(HR: 0.87;95% ci: 0.60-1.27)。6个月时,该结果在队列间未观察到差异(HR: 1.00;95% CI: 0.71-1.40)或3或6个月时的任何其他结果。总之,接受利伐沙班或阿哌沙班治疗的患者出现复发性静脉血栓栓塞或任何出血导致癌症相关性静脉血栓栓塞患者住院的风险相似。本研究在www.clinicaltrials.gov注册,编号为#NCT05461807。利伐沙班和阿哌沙班治疗6个月的癌症相关性静脉血栓栓塞的有效性和安全性相似。因此,临床医生在选择最佳抗凝剂时应考虑患者的偏好和依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信