An Analysis of Pediatric Ophthalmology Content on TikTok.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Rucha K Borkhetaria, Nitya Devireddy, Nathan Cannon, Ajay Soni, Amanda L Ely
{"title":"An Analysis of Pediatric Ophthalmology Content on TikTok.","authors":"Rucha K Borkhetaria, Nitya Devireddy, Nathan Cannon, Ajay Soni, Amanda L Ely","doi":"10.3928/01913913-20230627-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess pediatric ophthalmology-related information on TikTok (ByteDance).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 12 most commonly searched terms from the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus website were queried as TikTok hashtags. The top 20 videos for each hashtag were analyzed for views, likes, comments, saves, shares, author status and gender, content, and engagement level ratio (ELR). Subanalysis of the educational videos for quality, understandability and actionability, and medical accuracy using the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and modified Medical Information and Content Index (mMICI) was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 222 videos revealed a cumulative 191,337,973 views. Patients/families created the most videos (60.4%), followed by optometrists (14.4%), other (laypeople/unknown) (9.0%), ophthalmologists (7.7%), non-ophthalmology physicians (4.5%), and nurses (4.1%). Content was predominantly patient experience (56.8%), followed by educational (25.2%), humor (11.7%), self-promotional (3.6%), procedures (0.9%), other (0.9%), advertisements (0.5%), and career (0.5%). Educational videos had a lower ELR than humorous (3.3 vs 8.2, <i>P</i> < .001) and patient experience (3.3 vs 5.3, <i>P</i> < .001) videos, but more saves than patient experience videos (74 vs 25, <i>P</i> = .009). The mDISCERN scores were greater for videos authored by ophthalmologists (3, <i>P</i> < .001) and optometrists (2.5, <i>P</i> < .001) compared to lay-people (1.5). Ophthalmologist PEMAT understandability scores were greater than non-ophthalmology providers' (95.5% vs 67.4%, <i>P</i> = .002). There was no difference in PEMAT actionability (<i>P</i> = .743) or mMICI scores among the author subgroups (<i>P</i> = .206).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric ophthalmology content on Tik-Tok ranges in quality and understandability. Additional research is needed to help promote posts created by eyecare providers to ensure evidence-based medical content reaches pediatric patients and their families. <b>[<i>J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus</i>. 2024;61(2):90-97.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"90-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20230627-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess pediatric ophthalmology-related information on TikTok (ByteDance).

Methods: The 12 most commonly searched terms from the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus website were queried as TikTok hashtags. The top 20 videos for each hashtag were analyzed for views, likes, comments, saves, shares, author status and gender, content, and engagement level ratio (ELR). Subanalysis of the educational videos for quality, understandability and actionability, and medical accuracy using the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and modified Medical Information and Content Index (mMICI) was performed.

Results: Analysis of 222 videos revealed a cumulative 191,337,973 views. Patients/families created the most videos (60.4%), followed by optometrists (14.4%), other (laypeople/unknown) (9.0%), ophthalmologists (7.7%), non-ophthalmology physicians (4.5%), and nurses (4.1%). Content was predominantly patient experience (56.8%), followed by educational (25.2%), humor (11.7%), self-promotional (3.6%), procedures (0.9%), other (0.9%), advertisements (0.5%), and career (0.5%). Educational videos had a lower ELR than humorous (3.3 vs 8.2, P < .001) and patient experience (3.3 vs 5.3, P < .001) videos, but more saves than patient experience videos (74 vs 25, P = .009). The mDISCERN scores were greater for videos authored by ophthalmologists (3, P < .001) and optometrists (2.5, P < .001) compared to lay-people (1.5). Ophthalmologist PEMAT understandability scores were greater than non-ophthalmology providers' (95.5% vs 67.4%, P = .002). There was no difference in PEMAT actionability (P = .743) or mMICI scores among the author subgroups (P = .206).

Conclusions: Pediatric ophthalmology content on Tik-Tok ranges in quality and understandability. Additional research is needed to help promote posts created by eyecare providers to ensure evidence-based medical content reaches pediatric patients and their families. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024;61(2):90-97.].

对 TikTok 上小儿眼科内容的分析。
目的:评估 TikTok (ByteDance) 上与小儿眼科相关的信息:从美国小儿眼科和斜视协会网站上查询了 12 个最常被搜索的词作为 TikTok 标签。对每个标签前 20 个视频的浏览量、点赞数、评论数、保存数、分享数、作者状态和性别、内容以及参与度比率(ELR)进行分析。使用修改后的 DISCERN(mDISCERN)、患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)和修改后的医学信息和内容指数(mMICI)对教育视频的质量、可理解性和可操作性以及医学准确性进行了子分析:对 222 个视频进行分析后发现,累计观看次数达 191,337,973 次。患者/家属制作的视频最多(60.4%),其次是验光师(14.4%)、其他(非专业人士/未知)(9.0%)、眼科医生(7.7%)、非眼科医生(4.5%)和护士(4.1%)。内容主要是患者体验(56.8%),其次是教育(25.2%)、幽默(11.7%)、自我宣传(3.6%)、程序(0.9%)、其他(0.9%)、广告(0.5%)和职业(0.5%)。教育视频的 ELR 低于幽默视频(3.3 vs 8.2,P < .001)和患者体验视频(3.3 vs 5.3,P < .001),但高于患者体验视频(74 vs 25,P = .009)。与普通人(1.5 分)相比,眼科医生(3 分,P < .001)和验光师(2.5 分,P < .001)撰写的视频的 mDISCERN 得分更高。眼科医生的 PEMAT 可理解性得分高于非眼科医生(95.5% vs 67.4%,P = .002)。作者分组之间的 PEMAT 可操作性(P = .743)或 mMICI 分数(P = .206)没有差异:结论:嘀嗒网上的小儿眼科内容在质量和可理解性方面参差不齐。需要开展更多的研究来帮助推广眼科医疗服务提供者创建的帖子,以确保儿科患者及其家人能看到以证据为基础的医疗内容。[2024;61(2):90-97.].
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus is a bimonthly peer-reviewed publication for pediatric ophthalmologists. The Journal has published original articles on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of eye disorders in the pediatric age group and the treatment of strabismus in all age groups for over 50 years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信