Early-onset inherited dystonias versus late-onset idiopathic dystonias: Same or different biological mechanisms?

Abstract

Dystonia syndromes encompass a heterogeneous group of movement disorders which might be differentiated by several clinical-historical features. Among the latter, age-at-onset is probably the most important in predicting the likelihood both for the symptoms to spread from focal to generalized and for a genetic cause to be found. Accordingly, dystonia syndromes are generally stratified into early-onset and late-onset forms, the former having a greater likelihood of being monogenic disorders and the latter to be possibly multifactorial diseases, despite being currently labeled as idiopathic. Nonetheless, there are several similarities between these two groups of dystonia, including shared pathophysiological and biological mechanisms. Moreover, there is also initial evidence of age-related modifiers of early-onset dystonia syndromes and of critical periods of vulnerability of the sensorimotor network, during which a combination of genetic and non-genetic insults is more likely to produce symptoms. Based on these lines of evidence, we reappraise the double-hit hypothesis of dystonia, which would accommodate both similarities and differences between early-onset and late-onset dystonia in a single framework.