The PCQ-Infertility Revised: A New Digital Instrument to Measure Treatment Satisfaction of Fertility Patients.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lotte van der Kolk, Ellen Smit, Josée Bloemer, Lise Marit van Wijk
{"title":"The PCQ-Infertility Revised: A New Digital Instrument to Measure Treatment Satisfaction of Fertility Patients.","authors":"Lotte van der Kolk,&nbsp;Ellen Smit,&nbsp;Josée Bloemer,&nbsp;Lise Marit van Wijk","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S416182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the key dimensions of healthcare quality is patient-centeredness, which represents how well healthcare is geared towards patients' needs and wishes. Many questionnaires that measure the patient-centeredness are long and complicated, eliciting non-response or careless responding. Moreover, responses to some commonly used questionnaires are difficult to interpret. The Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire-Infertility (PCQ-Infertility) is used to measure the patient's experience of fertility healthcare quality. The aim of this study was to improve the PCQ-Infertility to allow large-scale clinical implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was performed in three parts. First, shortcomings of the original PCQ-Infertility were identified by evaluation of expert opinions. Second, the number of items were reduced, and items were rescaled and rephrased. Third, 844 patients filled in the original PCQ-Infertility and 260 patients filled in the revised PCQ-Infertility and reliability analyses were performed. In addition, a confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the revised PCQ-Infertility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of items in the revised questionnaire was reduced by 24% (from 51 to 39 items), which increased the internal consistency and reliability. The reliability analyses and confirmatory factor analysis indicated high consistency and convergent validity in all seven dimensions (accessibility, information, communication, patient involvement, respect for patient's values, continuity and transition, and competence) of the revised PCQ-Infertility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The revised PCQ-Infertility is a more valid and reliable instrument than the original PCQ-Infertility, easier to interpret and shorter. Therefore, large-scale clinical implementation and data analysis are now possible, giving the opportunity for fertility care professionals to evaluate and improve their healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":"14 ","pages":"223-234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7e/42/prom-14-223.PMC10362858.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S416182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the key dimensions of healthcare quality is patient-centeredness, which represents how well healthcare is geared towards patients' needs and wishes. Many questionnaires that measure the patient-centeredness are long and complicated, eliciting non-response or careless responding. Moreover, responses to some commonly used questionnaires are difficult to interpret. The Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire-Infertility (PCQ-Infertility) is used to measure the patient's experience of fertility healthcare quality. The aim of this study was to improve the PCQ-Infertility to allow large-scale clinical implementation.

Methods: The study was performed in three parts. First, shortcomings of the original PCQ-Infertility were identified by evaluation of expert opinions. Second, the number of items were reduced, and items were rescaled and rephrased. Third, 844 patients filled in the original PCQ-Infertility and 260 patients filled in the revised PCQ-Infertility and reliability analyses were performed. In addition, a confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the revised PCQ-Infertility.

Results: The number of items in the revised questionnaire was reduced by 24% (from 51 to 39 items), which increased the internal consistency and reliability. The reliability analyses and confirmatory factor analysis indicated high consistency and convergent validity in all seven dimensions (accessibility, information, communication, patient involvement, respect for patient's values, continuity and transition, and competence) of the revised PCQ-Infertility.

Conclusion: The revised PCQ-Infertility is a more valid and reliable instrument than the original PCQ-Infertility, easier to interpret and shorter. Therefore, large-scale clinical implementation and data analysis are now possible, giving the opportunity for fertility care professionals to evaluate and improve their healthcare.

pcq -不孕症修正:一种衡量不孕症患者治疗满意度的新型数字仪器。
背景:医疗保健质量的一个关键维度是以患者为中心,这代表了医疗保健如何很好地满足患者的需求和愿望。许多测量以病人为中心的问卷都很长很复杂,容易引起无反应或漫不经心的回答。此外,一些常用问卷的回答很难解释。采用以患者为中心的不孕症问卷(pcq -不孕症)来衡量患者对生育保健质量的体验。本研究的目的是改进pcq -不孕症,以便大规模临床应用。方法:研究分为三部分。首先,通过对专家意见的评估,找出了原pcq -不孕症的不足之处。其次,减少了项目的数量,并重新调整了项目的规模和措辞。第三,填写原pcq -不孕症量表844例,修改后pcq -不孕症量表260例,进行信度分析。此外,对修订后的pcq -不孕症进行验证性因素分析。结果:修订后问卷的题目数减少了24%(由51项减至39项),提高了问卷的内部一致性和信度。信度分析和验证性因子分析表明,修订后的《不孕不育诊断手册》在可及性、信息、沟通、患者参与、尊重患者价值观、连续性和过渡性、能力等7个维度均具有较高的一致性和收敛效度。结论:修订后的pcq -不孕症量表比原来的pcq -不孕症量表更有效、更可靠、更易于解释、更简短。因此,大规模的临床实施和数据分析现在是可能的,为生育护理专业人员提供了评估和改善其医疗保健的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient Related Outcome Measures
Patient Related Outcome Measures HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信