Exploring the Irish general practice training community's perceptions on how an entrustable professional activities dashboard implementation could facilitate general practice training in Ireland.

IF 1.5 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Brian McEllistrem, Marije P Hennus, Tim Fawns, Karena Hanley
{"title":"Exploring the Irish general practice training community's perceptions on how an entrustable professional activities dashboard implementation could facilitate general practice training in Ireland.","authors":"Brian McEllistrem,&nbsp;Marije P Hennus,&nbsp;Tim Fawns,&nbsp;Karena Hanley","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2023.2191340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Irish General Practitioner Training (GP) Programme is currently moving to Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME), facilitated by Programmatic Assessment (PA) and Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs). These new assessment and feedback mechanisms may provide a rich and much sought-after dataset. However, given the possible number of feedback and assessment events, and the variety of modalities used, aggregating and interpreting these can be costly and difficult. Dashboard implementations (DI) have been purposed as a solution to bridge the gap between the large datasets and the training community at all levels.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the Irish GP training community's perceptions on how an EPAs DI could facilitate the delivery of GP training in Ireland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative approach was taken, using a focus group representative of different groups in the training community. Concurrently, an EPAs DI was developed. Focus group transcripts were analysed in an iterative fashion using Template Analysis to generate themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Numerous advantages were seen in relation to the implementation of an EPAs DI around entrustment decisions, constructive alignment and summative decision-making. These advantages, however, need to be tempered with the realisation that the EPAs DI is not and should not be misinterpreted as being the learning analytic panacea for GP training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This paper outlines the perceptions from a postgraduate medical education training community on an EPAs DI, which would be applicable to other training communities considering introducing similar mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2023.2191340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Irish General Practitioner Training (GP) Programme is currently moving to Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME), facilitated by Programmatic Assessment (PA) and Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs). These new assessment and feedback mechanisms may provide a rich and much sought-after dataset. However, given the possible number of feedback and assessment events, and the variety of modalities used, aggregating and interpreting these can be costly and difficult. Dashboard implementations (DI) have been purposed as a solution to bridge the gap between the large datasets and the training community at all levels.

Aims: To explore the Irish GP training community's perceptions on how an EPAs DI could facilitate the delivery of GP training in Ireland.

Methods: A qualitative approach was taken, using a focus group representative of different groups in the training community. Concurrently, an EPAs DI was developed. Focus group transcripts were analysed in an iterative fashion using Template Analysis to generate themes and subthemes.

Results: Numerous advantages were seen in relation to the implementation of an EPAs DI around entrustment decisions, constructive alignment and summative decision-making. These advantages, however, need to be tempered with the realisation that the EPAs DI is not and should not be misinterpreted as being the learning analytic panacea for GP training.

Conclusion: This paper outlines the perceptions from a postgraduate medical education training community on an EPAs DI, which would be applicable to other training communities considering introducing similar mechanisms.

探索爱尔兰全科实践培训社区对可信赖的专业活动仪表板实施如何促进爱尔兰全科实践培训的看法。
背景:在计划性评估(PA)和可信赖的专业活动(EPAs)的推动下,爱尔兰全科医生培训(GP)计划目前正在向基于能力的医学教育(CBME)转变。这些新的评估和反馈机制可能会提供丰富且广受欢迎的数据集。然而,考虑到反馈和评估事件的可能数量,以及所使用的各种模式,汇总和解释这些事件可能是昂贵和困难的。仪表板实现(DI)的目的是作为弥合大型数据集和各级培训社区之间差距的解决方案。目的:探讨爱尔兰全科医生培训社区对EPAs DI如何促进爱尔兰全科医生培训交付的看法。方法:采用定性方法,在培训社区中使用具有代表性的焦点小组。同时,开发了EPAs DI。使用模板分析以迭代的方式分析焦点小组记录,以生成主题和副主题。结果:在围绕委托决策、建设性对齐和总结性决策实施EPAs DI方面,可以看到许多优势。然而,这些优势需要与EPAs DI不是也不应该被误解为全科医生培训的学习分析灵丹妙药的认识相调和。结论:本文概述了研究生医学教育培训社区对EPAs DI的看法,这将适用于其他考虑引入类似机制的培训社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信