Ignacio Catalá-Vilaplana, Alberto Encarnación-Martínez, Andrés Camacho-García, Roberto Sanchis-Sanchis, Pedro Pérez-Soriano
{"title":"Influence of surface condition and prolonged running on impact accelerations.","authors":"Ignacio Catalá-Vilaplana, Alberto Encarnación-Martínez, Andrés Camacho-García, Roberto Sanchis-Sanchis, Pedro Pérez-Soriano","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2023.2214519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Running can be performed on different types of surfaces with distinct characteristics. These differences between the running surfaces may affect impact accelerations during prolonged running. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the type of running surface (motorised treadmill (MT), curved non-motorised treadmill (cNMT), and overground (OVG)) and prolonged running in impact accelerations, spatiotemporal parameters and perceptual variables. In the current study, twenty-one recreational runners completed three randomised crossover prolonged running test on these surfaces consisting of a 30-minute run at 80% of the individual maximal aerobic speed. A two-way repeated-measure analysis of variance, with the level of significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05, showed a reduction in impact accelerations, such as tibia peak acceleration, when running on cNMT vs MT (<i>p</i> = 0.001, ES = 4.2) or OVG (<i>p</i> = 0.004, ES = 2.9). Running on cNMT produced an increase in stride frequency (<i>p</i> = 0.023, ES = 0.9) and higher rating of perceived effort (<i>p</i> < 0.001, ES = 8.9) and heart rate (<i>p</i> = 0.001, ES = 2.9) compared to OVG, with no differences between treadmills. These findings suggest that impact accelerations, spatiotemporal parameters, rating of perceived exertion and heart rate are different between the surfaces analysed, what should be taken into consideration when running on these surfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":49482,"journal":{"name":"Sports Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"1064-1078"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2023.2214519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Running can be performed on different types of surfaces with distinct characteristics. These differences between the running surfaces may affect impact accelerations during prolonged running. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the type of running surface (motorised treadmill (MT), curved non-motorised treadmill (cNMT), and overground (OVG)) and prolonged running in impact accelerations, spatiotemporal parameters and perceptual variables. In the current study, twenty-one recreational runners completed three randomised crossover prolonged running test on these surfaces consisting of a 30-minute run at 80% of the individual maximal aerobic speed. A two-way repeated-measure analysis of variance, with the level of significance set at p < 0.05, showed a reduction in impact accelerations, such as tibia peak acceleration, when running on cNMT vs MT (p = 0.001, ES = 4.2) or OVG (p = 0.004, ES = 2.9). Running on cNMT produced an increase in stride frequency (p = 0.023, ES = 0.9) and higher rating of perceived effort (p < 0.001, ES = 8.9) and heart rate (p = 0.001, ES = 2.9) compared to OVG, with no differences between treadmills. These findings suggest that impact accelerations, spatiotemporal parameters, rating of perceived exertion and heart rate are different between the surfaces analysed, what should be taken into consideration when running on these surfaces.
跑步可以在不同类型的表面上进行,具有不同的特征。这些不同的表面可能会影响长时间跑步时的冲击加速度。本研究的目的是比较跑步表面类型(机动跑步机(MT)、弯曲的非机动跑步机(cNMT)和地上跑步机(OVG))和长时间跑步对冲击加速度、时空参数和感知变量的影响。在目前的研究中,21名休闲跑步者在这些表面上完成了三次随机交叉长时间跑步测试,包括以个人最大有氧速度的80%跑30分钟。双向重复测量方差分析,显著性水平设置为p = 0.001, ES = 4.2)或OVG (p = 0.004, ES = 2.9)。与OVG相比,在cNMT上跑步增加了跨步频率(p = 0.023, ES = 0.9)和更高的感知努力评分(p p = 0.001, ES = 2.9),不同跑步机之间没有差异。这些发现表明,撞击加速度、时空参数、感知运动强度和心率在不同的表面上是不同的,在这些表面上跑步时应该考虑什么。
期刊介绍:
Sports Biomechanics is the Thomson Reuters listed scientific journal of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS). The journal sets out to generate knowledge to improve human performance and reduce the incidence of injury, and to communicate this knowledge to scientists, coaches, clinicians, teachers, and participants. The target performance realms include not only the conventional areas of sports and exercise, but also fundamental motor skills and other highly specialized human movements such as dance (both sport and artistic).
Sports Biomechanics is unique in its emphasis on a broad biomechanical spectrum of human performance including, but not limited to, technique, skill acquisition, training, strength and conditioning, exercise, coaching, teaching, equipment, modeling and simulation, measurement, and injury prevention and rehabilitation. As well as maintaining scientific rigour, there is a strong editorial emphasis on ''reader friendliness''. By emphasising the practical implications and applications of research, the journal seeks to benefit practitioners directly.
Sports Biomechanics publishes papers in four sections: Original Research, Reviews, Teaching, and Methods and Theoretical Perspectives.