Periconceptional Folic Acid Only Versus Multiple Micronutrients Containing Folic Acid and Association with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus - Beijing Municipality, China, 2017-2021.

Shuangbo Xia, Yushan Du, Ziyang Ren, Jinjuan Zhang, Suhong Gao, Jiamei Wang, Zhiwen Li, Xiaohong Liu, Jufen Liu
{"title":"Periconceptional Folic Acid Only Versus Multiple Micronutrients Containing Folic Acid and Association with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus - Beijing Municipality, China, 2017-2021.","authors":"Shuangbo Xia,&nbsp;Yushan Du,&nbsp;Ziyang Ren,&nbsp;Jinjuan Zhang,&nbsp;Suhong Gao,&nbsp;Jiamei Wang,&nbsp;Zhiwen Li,&nbsp;Xiaohong Liu,&nbsp;Jufen Liu","doi":"10.46234/ccdcw2023.095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>What is already known about this topic?: </strong>Inconsistent results have been reported on the association between periconceptional folic acid only (FAO) or multiple micronutrients containing folic acid (MMFA) supplementation and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in previous research.</p><p><strong>What is added by this report?: </strong>In a prospective cohort study conducted among pregnant women in Haidian District, Beijing Municipality, it was observed that those who took MMFA demonstrated a higher likelihood of developing GDM in comparison to those who consumed FAO periconceptionally. Interestingly, the increased risk for GDM in pregnant women supplemented with MMFA compared to FAO was primarily due to changes in fasting plasma glucose.</p><p><strong>What are the implications for public health practice?: </strong>It is highly recommended that women prioritize the use of FAO in order to yield potential benefits in the prevention of GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9867,"journal":{"name":"China CDC Weekly","volume":"5 23","pages":"505-510"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/07/79/ccdcw-5-23-505.PMC10316611.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China CDC Weekly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2023.095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

What is already known about this topic?: Inconsistent results have been reported on the association between periconceptional folic acid only (FAO) or multiple micronutrients containing folic acid (MMFA) supplementation and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in previous research.

What is added by this report?: In a prospective cohort study conducted among pregnant women in Haidian District, Beijing Municipality, it was observed that those who took MMFA demonstrated a higher likelihood of developing GDM in comparison to those who consumed FAO periconceptionally. Interestingly, the increased risk for GDM in pregnant women supplemented with MMFA compared to FAO was primarily due to changes in fasting plasma glucose.

What are the implications for public health practice?: It is highly recommended that women prioritize the use of FAO in order to yield potential benefits in the prevention of GDM.

Abstract Image

妊娠期仅叶酸与含叶酸的多种微量营养素与妊娠糖尿病的关系——北京市,中国,2017-2021。
关于这个话题我们已经知道了什么?在以往的研究中,关于妊娠期仅补充叶酸(FAO)或补充含有叶酸的多种微量营养素(MMFA)与妊娠糖尿病(GDM)风险之间的关系,报道的结果并不一致。这份报告增加了什么内容?在对北京市海淀区孕妇进行的一项前瞻性队列研究中,观察到服用MMFA的孕妇患GDM的可能性高于孕产期食用FAO的孕妇。有趣的是,与FAO相比,补充MMFA的孕妇患GDM的风险增加主要是由于空腹血糖的变化。这对公共卫生实践有什么影响?强烈建议妇女优先利用粮农组织,以便在预防GDM方面产生潜在效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信