Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of incidental durotomy during decompression in degenerative lumbar spine conditions.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Fabian Winter, Stefan Hasslinger, Anton Frueh, Wolfgang Marik, Marcus Raudner, Dorian Hirschmann, Magnus Kuess, Stephan N Salzmann, Anna Rienmueller, Karl Roessler, Christian Dorfer, Johannes Herta
{"title":"Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of incidental durotomy during decompression in degenerative lumbar spine conditions.","authors":"Fabian Winter,&nbsp;Stefan Hasslinger,&nbsp;Anton Frueh,&nbsp;Wolfgang Marik,&nbsp;Marcus Raudner,&nbsp;Dorian Hirschmann,&nbsp;Magnus Kuess,&nbsp;Stephan N Salzmann,&nbsp;Anna Rienmueller,&nbsp;Karl Roessler,&nbsp;Christian Dorfer,&nbsp;Johannes Herta","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05404-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to identify independent risk factors for incidental durotomy (ID) during decompressive lumbar spine surgery, and to describe its treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective review includes 650 patients who underwent lumbar decompression at a tertiary institution between January 2015 and October 2019. Data collection was obtained through one independent researcher. The incidence rate and treatment of ID was evaluated by a chart review of operative notes, patient charts, physiotherapy reports, and nursing reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence rate of ID was 12.6%. The most common reason for admission was disc herniation (63.2%), followed by vertebral stenosis (22.1%). ID resulted in significantly longer operation time (P=0.0001) and length of hospitalization (P=0.0001). A correlation between ID and patient's diagnosis (P=0.0078) as well as the chosen type of surgery (P=0.0404) with an Odds Ratio to cause ID of 1.9 for laminectomy and 1.6 for undercutting compared to microdiscectomy were found. However, age, sex, surgeon experience, lumbar level, revision surgery, as well as multilevel surgery were not significantly correlated with the incidence of ID. Dural tears were closed with dural sealant (47.2%), polyester 4-0 sutures (11.1%) or a combination of both (37.5%) and the majority of patients had bed rest of at least two days. By usage of these treatment methods no patient needed reoperation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diagnosis of vertebrostenosis as well as laminectomy were significantly correlated with the incidence of ID. Treatment with intraoperative closure and postoperative bed rest even though not standardized led to complication free outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":"67 4","pages":"507-511"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05404-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to identify independent risk factors for incidental durotomy (ID) during decompressive lumbar spine surgery, and to describe its treatment.

Methods: This retrospective review includes 650 patients who underwent lumbar decompression at a tertiary institution between January 2015 and October 2019. Data collection was obtained through one independent researcher. The incidence rate and treatment of ID was evaluated by a chart review of operative notes, patient charts, physiotherapy reports, and nursing reports.

Results: The incidence rate of ID was 12.6%. The most common reason for admission was disc herniation (63.2%), followed by vertebral stenosis (22.1%). ID resulted in significantly longer operation time (P=0.0001) and length of hospitalization (P=0.0001). A correlation between ID and patient's diagnosis (P=0.0078) as well as the chosen type of surgery (P=0.0404) with an Odds Ratio to cause ID of 1.9 for laminectomy and 1.6 for undercutting compared to microdiscectomy were found. However, age, sex, surgeon experience, lumbar level, revision surgery, as well as multilevel surgery were not significantly correlated with the incidence of ID. Dural tears were closed with dural sealant (47.2%), polyester 4-0 sutures (11.1%) or a combination of both (37.5%) and the majority of patients had bed rest of at least two days. By usage of these treatment methods no patient needed reoperation.

Conclusions: Diagnosis of vertebrostenosis as well as laminectomy were significantly correlated with the incidence of ID. Treatment with intraoperative closure and postoperative bed rest even though not standardized led to complication free outcomes.

腰椎退行性减压时意外硬膜切开的发生率、危险因素和治疗。
背景:本研究的目的是确定腰椎减压手术中偶发性硬膜切开(ID)的独立危险因素,并描述其治疗方法。方法:本回顾性研究包括650例2015年1月至2019年10月在某高等教育机构接受腰椎减压术的患者。数据收集是通过一名独立研究员获得的。通过回顾手术记录、患者病历、物理治疗报告和护理报告来评估ID的发生率和治疗情况。结果:ID的发生率为12.6%。最常见的入院原因是椎间盘突出(63.2%),其次是椎体狭窄(22.1%)。ID导致手术时间(P=0.0001)和住院时间(P=0.0001)明显延长。ID与患者的诊断(P=0.0078)以及选择的手术类型(P=0.0404)存在相关性,与微椎间盘切除术相比,椎板切除术的ID为1.9,下切手术的ID为1.6。然而,年龄、性别、外科医生经验、腰椎水平、翻修手术以及多节段手术与ID的发生率无显著相关。硬脑膜撕裂用硬脑膜密封剂(47.2%)、聚酯4-0缝合线(11.1%)或两者联合(37.5%)缝合,大多数患者至少卧床休息2天。使用这些治疗方法,患者无需再手术。结论:椎体狭窄的诊断及椎板切除术与内窥镜发生率显著相关。术中闭合和术后卧床治疗即使没有标准化,也会导致无并发症的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信