Neural correlates of learning accommodation and consolidation in generalised anxiety disorder.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Acta Neuropsychiatrica Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-27 DOI:10.1017/neu.2022.16
Marta Migó, Tina Chou, Alik S Widge, Amy T Peters, Kristen Ellard, Darin D Dougherty, Thilo Deckersbach
{"title":"Neural correlates of learning accommodation and consolidation in generalised anxiety disorder.","authors":"Marta Migó,&nbsp;Tina Chou,&nbsp;Alik S Widge,&nbsp;Amy T Peters,&nbsp;Kristen Ellard,&nbsp;Darin D Dougherty,&nbsp;Thilo Deckersbach","doi":"10.1017/neu.2022.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective.: </strong>Anxiety can interfere with attention and working memory, which are components that affect learning. Statistical models have been designed to study learning, such as the Bayesian Learning Model, which takes into account prior possibilities and behaviours to determine how much of a new behaviour is determined by learning instead of chance. However, the neurobiological basis underlying how anxiety interferes with learning is not yet known. Accordingly, we aimed to use neuroimaging techniques and apply a Bayesian Learning Model to study learning in individuals with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD).</p><p><strong>Methods.: </strong>Participants were 25 controls and 14 individuals with GAD and comorbid disorders. During fMRI, participants completed a shape-button association learning and reversal task. Using a flexible factorial analysis in SPM, activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, and hippocampus was compared between groups during first reversal. Beta values from the peak of these regions were extracted for all learning conditions and submitted to repeated measures analyses in SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results.: </strong>Individuals with GAD showed less activation in the basal ganglia and the hippocampus only in the first reversal compared with controls. This difference was not present in the initial learning and second reversal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion.: </strong>Given that the basal ganglia is associated with initial learning, and the hippocampus with transfer of knowledge from short- to long-term memory, our results suggest that GAD may engage these regions to a lesser extent during early accommodation or consolidation of learning, but have no longer term effects in brain activation patterns during subsequent learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":7066,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2022.16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.: Anxiety can interfere with attention and working memory, which are components that affect learning. Statistical models have been designed to study learning, such as the Bayesian Learning Model, which takes into account prior possibilities and behaviours to determine how much of a new behaviour is determined by learning instead of chance. However, the neurobiological basis underlying how anxiety interferes with learning is not yet known. Accordingly, we aimed to use neuroimaging techniques and apply a Bayesian Learning Model to study learning in individuals with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD).

Methods.: Participants were 25 controls and 14 individuals with GAD and comorbid disorders. During fMRI, participants completed a shape-button association learning and reversal task. Using a flexible factorial analysis in SPM, activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, and hippocampus was compared between groups during first reversal. Beta values from the peak of these regions were extracted for all learning conditions and submitted to repeated measures analyses in SPSS.

Results.: Individuals with GAD showed less activation in the basal ganglia and the hippocampus only in the first reversal compared with controls. This difference was not present in the initial learning and second reversal.

Conclusion.: Given that the basal ganglia is associated with initial learning, and the hippocampus with transfer of knowledge from short- to long-term memory, our results suggest that GAD may engage these regions to a lesser extent during early accommodation or consolidation of learning, but have no longer term effects in brain activation patterns during subsequent learning.

广泛性焦虑症中学习适应和巩固的神经相关性。
目标焦虑会干扰注意力和工作记忆,这是影响学习的组成部分。已经设计了统计模型来研究学习,例如贝叶斯学习模型,该模型考虑了先前的可能性和行为,以确定有多少新行为是由学习而非偶然决定的。然而,焦虑如何干扰学习的神经生物学基础尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在使用神经成像技术并应用贝叶斯学习模型来研究广泛性焦虑症(GAD)患者的学习。方法:参与者是25名对照和14名GAD和共病患者。在功能磁共振成像过程中,参与者完成了形状按钮关联学习和反转任务。使用SPM中的灵活因子分析,在第一次逆转过程中,比较各组背外侧前额叶皮层、基底神经节和海马的激活情况。从这些区域的峰值提取所有学习条件下的β值,并在SPSS中进行重复测量分析。结果:与对照组相比,GAD患者仅在第一次逆转时基底节和海马的激活较少。这种差异在最初的学习和第二次逆转中并不存在。结论:考虑到基底神经节与初始学习有关,海马体与从短期记忆到长期记忆的知识转移有关,我们的研究结果表明,在早期适应或巩固学习过程中,GAD可能在较小程度上参与这些区域,但在随后的学习过程中对大脑激活模式没有长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
Acta Neuropsychiatrica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neuropsychiatrica is an international journal focussing on translational neuropsychiatry. It publishes high-quality original research papers and reviews. The Journal''s scope specifically highlights the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health that can be viewed broadly as the spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信