Evaluating substance use outcomes of recreational cannabis legalization using a unique co-twin control design.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
J Megan Ross, Hollis C Karoly, Stephanie M Zellers, Jarrod M Ellingson, Robin P Corley, William G Iacono, John K Hewitt, Matt McGue, Scott Vrieze, Christian J Hopfer
{"title":"Evaluating substance use outcomes of recreational cannabis legalization using a unique co-twin control design.","authors":"J Megan Ross, Hollis C Karoly, Stephanie M Zellers, Jarrod M Ellingson, Robin P Corley, William G Iacono, John K Hewitt, Matt McGue, Scott Vrieze, Christian J Hopfer","doi":"10.1080/00952990.2022.2163177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> As more states pass recreational cannabis legalization (RCL), we must understand how RCL affects substance use.<i>Objectives:</i> The current study aims to examine the effect of RCL on lifetime and past-year use of cannabis, alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs, frequency of cannabis, alcohol, and tobacco use, co-use of cannabis with alcohol and tobacco, and consequences from cannabis and alcohol use.<i>Methods:</i> We used a unique, co-twin control design of twin pairs who were discordant for living in a state with RCL between 2018 and 2021. The sample consisted of 3,830 adult twins (41% male), including 232 twin pairs discordant for RCL. Problems from alcohol and cannabis use were assessed via the Brief Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire and the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire.<i>Results:</i> Results indicated that the twin living in an RCL state was more likely to endorse past-year cannabis use (OR = 1.56, <i>p</i> = .009), greater number of cannabis use days in the past 6 months (β = 0.47, <i>p</i> = .019), but not more negative consequences from cannabis use (β = 0.21, <i>p</i> = .456) compared to their co-twin in a non-RCL state. There were no differences within-twin pairs in frequency of alcohol use (β=-0.05, <i>p</i> = .601), but the RCL twin reported fewer negative consequences from alcohol use (β=-0.29, <i>p</i> = .016) compared to their co-twin in a non-RCL state. We did not observe any other differences within-twin pairs on other outcomes.<i>Conclusion:</i> These results suggest that living in an RCL state is associated with greater cannabis frequency but not more negative consequences from cannabis use than living in a non-RCL state.</p>","PeriodicalId":48957,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"630-639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2022.2163177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As more states pass recreational cannabis legalization (RCL), we must understand how RCL affects substance use.Objectives: The current study aims to examine the effect of RCL on lifetime and past-year use of cannabis, alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs, frequency of cannabis, alcohol, and tobacco use, co-use of cannabis with alcohol and tobacco, and consequences from cannabis and alcohol use.Methods: We used a unique, co-twin control design of twin pairs who were discordant for living in a state with RCL between 2018 and 2021. The sample consisted of 3,830 adult twins (41% male), including 232 twin pairs discordant for RCL. Problems from alcohol and cannabis use were assessed via the Brief Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire and the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire.Results: Results indicated that the twin living in an RCL state was more likely to endorse past-year cannabis use (OR = 1.56, p = .009), greater number of cannabis use days in the past 6 months (β = 0.47, p = .019), but not more negative consequences from cannabis use (β = 0.21, p = .456) compared to their co-twin in a non-RCL state. There were no differences within-twin pairs in frequency of alcohol use (β=-0.05, p = .601), but the RCL twin reported fewer negative consequences from alcohol use (β=-0.29, p = .016) compared to their co-twin in a non-RCL state. We did not observe any other differences within-twin pairs on other outcomes.Conclusion: These results suggest that living in an RCL state is associated with greater cannabis frequency but not more negative consequences from cannabis use than living in a non-RCL state.

使用独特的双孪生控制设计评估娱乐性大麻合法化的物质使用结果。
背景:随着越来越多的州通过娱乐性大麻合法化(RCL),我们必须了解RCL如何影响物质使用。目的:目前的研究旨在检查RCL对终生和过去一年使用大麻、酒精、烟草和其他药物的影响,大麻、酒精和烟草的使用频率,大麻与酒精和烟草的共同使用,以及大麻和酒精使用的后果。方法:我们采用独特的双胎对照设计,对2018年至2021年间生活在RCL州的双胞胎进行对照。样本包括3830对成年双胞胎(41%为男性),包括232对RCL不一致的双胞胎。酒精和大麻使用的问题通过大麻后果简短问卷和青少年酒精后果简短问卷进行评估。结果:结果表明,与非RCL状态的双胞胎相比,生活在RCL状态的双胞胎更有可能支持过去一年的大麻使用(OR = 1.56, p = 0.009),过去6个月的大麻使用日数更多(β = 0.47, p = 0.019),但大麻使用的负面后果(β = 0.21, p = .456)。在双胞胎中,酒精使用频率没有差异(β=-0.05, p = .601),但与非RCL状态的双胞胎相比,RCL双胞胎报告的酒精使用的负面后果较少(β=-0.29, p = .016)。我们没有观察到双胞胎在其他结果上的任何其他差异。结论:这些结果表明,与生活在非RCL状态相比,生活在RCL状态下的大麻使用频率更高,而不是更多的负面后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (AJDAA) is an international journal published six times per year and provides an important and stimulating venue for the exchange of ideas between the researchers working in diverse areas, including public policy, epidemiology, neurobiology, and the treatment of addictive disorders. AJDAA includes a wide range of translational research, covering preclinical and clinical aspects of the field. AJDAA covers these topics with focused data presentations and authoritative reviews of timely developments in our field. Manuscripts exploring addictions other than substance use disorders are encouraged. Reviews and Perspectives of emerging fields are given priority consideration. Areas of particular interest include: public health policy; novel research methodologies; human and animal pharmacology; human translational studies, including neuroimaging; pharmacological and behavioral treatments; new modalities of care; molecular and family genetic studies; medicinal use of substances traditionally considered substances of abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信