Impact of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage on the Cardiac Autonomic Function During Rehabilitation in Children After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurotrauma reports Pub Date : 2023-07-14 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/neur.2023.0032
Gilad Sorek, Sharon Shaklai, Isabelle Gagnon, Kathryn Schneider, Mathilde Chevignard, Nurit Stern, Yahaloma Fadida, Liran Kalderon, Michal Katz-Leurer
{"title":"Impact of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage on the Cardiac Autonomic Function During Rehabilitation in Children After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Gilad Sorek,&nbsp;Sharon Shaklai,&nbsp;Isabelle Gagnon,&nbsp;Kathryn Schneider,&nbsp;Mathilde Chevignard,&nbsp;Nurit Stern,&nbsp;Yahaloma Fadida,&nbsp;Liran Kalderon,&nbsp;Michal Katz-Leurer","doi":"10.1089/neur.2023.0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the impact of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) on cardiac autonomic control system (CACS) function in children after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) during the subacute rehabilitation period. Thirty-three participants, 8-18 years of age, 42 (14-149) days after severe TBI at the beginning of the subacute rehabilitation, were included in the study. Six participants were diagnosed with tSAH during acute medical care (tSAH group). Heart rate variability (HRV) was assessed by the standard deviation of the N-N interval (SDNN) and the square root of the mean square differences of successive R-R interval (RMSSD) using a Polar RS800CX device while sitting at rest for 5 min. A second assessment was performed 8 weeks later. No significant difference between the tSAH and non-tSAH groups were found in the demographic and functional characteristics or injury severity. However, in comparison to the non-tSAH group, the tSAH group had lower SDNN (23.9 [10.5-47.3] vs. 43.9 [21.8-118.8], respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.005) and RMSSD values (11.8 [5.9-24.5] vs. 29.6 [8.9-71.7], respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.004). Neither group demonstrated changes in HRV values at rest in the second assessment, whereas the significant difference in SDNN (<i>p</i> = 0.035) and RMSSD (<i>p</i> = 0.008) remained. Children diagnosed with SAH after severe TBI presented poorer CACS function during the subacute rehabilitation. Given that reduced HRV values may be a marker for potential heart disease, the medical team should be aware of the influence of existing tSAH. Future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are warranted to further investigate this topic. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03215082.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"458-462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotrauma reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2023.0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the impact of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) on cardiac autonomic control system (CACS) function in children after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) during the subacute rehabilitation period. Thirty-three participants, 8-18 years of age, 42 (14-149) days after severe TBI at the beginning of the subacute rehabilitation, were included in the study. Six participants were diagnosed with tSAH during acute medical care (tSAH group). Heart rate variability (HRV) was assessed by the standard deviation of the N-N interval (SDNN) and the square root of the mean square differences of successive R-R interval (RMSSD) using a Polar RS800CX device while sitting at rest for 5 min. A second assessment was performed 8 weeks later. No significant difference between the tSAH and non-tSAH groups were found in the demographic and functional characteristics or injury severity. However, in comparison to the non-tSAH group, the tSAH group had lower SDNN (23.9 [10.5-47.3] vs. 43.9 [21.8-118.8], respectively; p = 0.005) and RMSSD values (11.8 [5.9-24.5] vs. 29.6 [8.9-71.7], respectively; p = 0.004). Neither group demonstrated changes in HRV values at rest in the second assessment, whereas the significant difference in SDNN (p = 0.035) and RMSSD (p = 0.008) remained. Children diagnosed with SAH after severe TBI presented poorer CACS function during the subacute rehabilitation. Given that reduced HRV values may be a marker for potential heart disease, the medical team should be aware of the influence of existing tSAH. Future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are warranted to further investigate this topic. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03215082.

蛛网膜下腔出血对儿童重型颅脑损伤康复期心脏自主功能的影响。
本研究旨在探讨亚急性康复期严重颅脑损伤(TBI)后,创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血(tSAH)对儿童心脏自主控制系统(CACS)功能的影响。33名参与者,年龄8-18岁,亚急性康复开始时严重TBI后42(14-149)天,被纳入研究。6名参与者在急性医疗护理期间被诊断为tSAH(tSAH组)。心率变异性(HRV)通过N-N间期的标准差(SDNN)和连续R-R间期的均方根差(RMSSD)进行评估,使用Polar RS800CX设备,在休息5分钟时进行评估 min。8周后进行第二次评估。tSAH组和非tSAH组在人口统计学和功能特征或损伤严重程度方面没有发现显著差异。然而,与非tSAH组相比,tSAH组的SDNN较低(分别为23.9[10.5-47.3]和43.9[21.8-11.8];p = 0.005)和RMSSD值(分别为11.8[5.9-24.5]和29.6[8.9-71.7];p = 0.004)。在第二次评估中,两组都没有表现出静息时HRV值的变化,而SDNN的显著差异(p = 0.035)和RMSSD(p = 0.008)。严重TBI后诊断为SAH的儿童在亚急性康复过程中CACS功能较差。鉴于HRV值降低可能是潜在心脏病的标志,医疗团队应意识到现有tSAH的影响。未来的研究需要更大的样本量和更长的随访期来进一步研究这一主题。ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT03215082。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信