Comparison of microbial profiles and viral status along the vagina-cervix-endometrium continuum of infertile patients.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANDROLOGY
Mark Jain, Elena Mladova, Anna Dobychina, Karina Kirillova, Anna Shichanina, Daniil Anokhin, Liya Scherbakova, Larisa Samokhodskaya, Olga Panina
{"title":"Comparison of microbial profiles and viral status along the vagina-cervix-endometrium continuum of infertile patients.","authors":"Mark Jain,&nbsp;Elena Mladova,&nbsp;Anna Dobychina,&nbsp;Karina Kirillova,&nbsp;Anna Shichanina,&nbsp;Daniil Anokhin,&nbsp;Liya Scherbakova,&nbsp;Larisa Samokhodskaya,&nbsp;Olga Panina","doi":"10.1080/19396368.2023.2195040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For decades, the endometrium was considered to be a sterile environment. However, now this concept is disputed, and there is growing evidence that microbiota composition might affect endometrial receptivity. Routine clinical management of infertility is still limited to a microbiological assessment of the lower reproductive tract. The purpose of this study was to compare the abundance of various bacterial, fungal, and viral species, qualitatively and quantitatively, in vaginal, cervical, and endometrial biomaterial of infertile patients. A total of 300 samples from 100 infertile patients of a private assisted reproduction clinic were analyzed. A broad real-time polymerase chain reaction panel was used to identify 28 relevant microbial taxa as well as three members of the Herpesviridae family. All patients underwent endometrial biopsy for further histopathological evaluation. Analysis of the microbial diversity (within the boundaries of the detection panel) revealed that Shannon indexes in the cervix and vagina were similar (1.4 × 10<sup>-2</sup> (1.6 × 10<sup>-3</sup> - 6.5 × 10<sup>-1</sup>) vs 1.9 × 10<sup>-2</sup> (2.3 × 10<sup>-3</sup> - 5.3 × 10<sup>-1</sup>), respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.502), whereas endometrial indexes differed significantly from both regions (0 (0 - 1.4 × 10<sup>-1</sup>), <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Surprisingly, 17 microbial and viral taxa were detected in at least one sample. Endometrium exhibited a quite distinct microbiological profile, being different at the detection rates of 14 taxa (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Remarkably, 4% and 2% of endometrial samples were positive for Cytomegalovirus and <i>Candida spp.</i>, respectively, while these were undetectable in corresponding cervical and vaginal samples. Prevalence of the <i>Gardnerella vaginalis</i> + <i>Prevotella bivia</i> + <i>Porphyromonas spp.</i> group in endometrium was associated with a low abundance of <i>Lactobacillus spp</i>. (<i>p</i> = 0.039). No noteworthy associations were identified between various microbiota characteristics and clinical parameters, such as chronic endometritis, uterine polyps and adhesions, endometriosis, and a history of sexually transmitted infections. These findings indicate that the microbiological profile of the endometrium is unique, and the analysis of the lower reproductive tract should supplement, rather than be a substitute for it.</p>","PeriodicalId":22184,"journal":{"name":"Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2023.2195040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For decades, the endometrium was considered to be a sterile environment. However, now this concept is disputed, and there is growing evidence that microbiota composition might affect endometrial receptivity. Routine clinical management of infertility is still limited to a microbiological assessment of the lower reproductive tract. The purpose of this study was to compare the abundance of various bacterial, fungal, and viral species, qualitatively and quantitatively, in vaginal, cervical, and endometrial biomaterial of infertile patients. A total of 300 samples from 100 infertile patients of a private assisted reproduction clinic were analyzed. A broad real-time polymerase chain reaction panel was used to identify 28 relevant microbial taxa as well as three members of the Herpesviridae family. All patients underwent endometrial biopsy for further histopathological evaluation. Analysis of the microbial diversity (within the boundaries of the detection panel) revealed that Shannon indexes in the cervix and vagina were similar (1.4 × 10-2 (1.6 × 10-3 - 6.5 × 10-1) vs 1.9 × 10-2 (2.3 × 10-3 - 5.3 × 10-1), respectively, p = 0.502), whereas endometrial indexes differed significantly from both regions (0 (0 - 1.4 × 10-1), p < 0.0001). Surprisingly, 17 microbial and viral taxa were detected in at least one sample. Endometrium exhibited a quite distinct microbiological profile, being different at the detection rates of 14 taxa (p < 0.05). Remarkably, 4% and 2% of endometrial samples were positive for Cytomegalovirus and Candida spp., respectively, while these were undetectable in corresponding cervical and vaginal samples. Prevalence of the Gardnerella vaginalis + Prevotella bivia + Porphyromonas spp. group in endometrium was associated with a low abundance of Lactobacillus spp. (p = 0.039). No noteworthy associations were identified between various microbiota characteristics and clinical parameters, such as chronic endometritis, uterine polyps and adhesions, endometriosis, and a history of sexually transmitted infections. These findings indicate that the microbiological profile of the endometrium is unique, and the analysis of the lower reproductive tract should supplement, rather than be a substitute for it.

不孕症患者阴道-子宫颈-子宫内膜连续体微生物谱和病毒状态的比较。
几十年来,子宫内膜被认为是一个无菌的环境。然而,现在这一概念存在争议,越来越多的证据表明微生物群组成可能影响子宫内膜容受性。不孕不育的常规临床管理仍然局限于对下生殖道的微生物学评估。本研究的目的是定性和定量地比较不孕患者阴道、宫颈和子宫内膜生物材料中各种细菌、真菌和病毒种类的丰度。对某私立辅助生殖诊所100例不孕症患者的300份样本进行了分析。广泛的实时聚合酶链反应面板用于鉴定28个相关微生物分类群以及疱疹病毒科的3个成员。所有患者均行子宫内膜活检以进一步进行组织病理学评估。微生物多样性分析(检测面板范围内)显示,子宫颈和阴道的Shannon指数相似(1.4 × 10-2 (1.6 × 10-3 - 6.5 × 10-1) vs 1.9 × 10-2 (2.3 × 10-3 - 5.3 × 10-1), p = 0.502),而子宫内膜指数差异显著(0 (0 - 1.4 × 10-1), p = 0.502),而在相应的子宫颈和阴道样本中均未检出。子宫内膜中阴道加德纳菌+ bivia普氏菌+卟啉单胞菌组的患病率与乳酸菌的低丰度相关(p = 0.039)。各种微生物群特征与临床参数(如慢性子宫内膜炎、子宫息肉和粘连、子宫内膜异位症和性传播感染史)之间没有明显的关联。这些发现表明,子宫内膜的微生物特征是独特的,对下生殖道的分析应该是补充,而不是替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, SBiRM, publishes Research Articles, Communications, Applications Notes that include protocols a Clinical Corner that includes case reports, Review Articles and Hypotheses and Letters to the Editor on human and animal reproduction. The journal will highlight the use of systems approaches including genomic, cellular, proteomic, metabolomic, bioinformatic, molecular, and biochemical, to address fundamental questions in reproductive biology, reproductive medicine, and translational research. The journal publishes research involving human and animal gametes, stem cells, developmental biology and toxicology, and clinical care in reproductive medicine. Specific areas of interest to the journal include: male factor infertility and germ cell biology, reproductive technologies (gamete micro-manipulation and cryopreservation, in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF/ET) and contraception. Research that is directed towards developing new or enhanced technologies for clinical medicine or scientific research in reproduction is of significant interest to the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信